Suppr超能文献

基于人群的巨细胞动脉炎炎症标志物表现

Population-Based Performance of Inflammatory Markers in Giant Cell Arteritis.

作者信息

Castillejo Becerra Clara M, Crowson Cynthia S, Langenfeld Hannah E, Tajfirouz Deena, Chodnicki Kevin D, Koster Matthew J, Warrington Kenneth J, Chen John J

机构信息

From the Department of Ophthalmology (C.C.B, D.T, K.C, J.C.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (C.C, M.K, K.W.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (C.C, H.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul;275:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.022. Epub 2025 Mar 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the population-based sensitivities and specificities of various inflammatory markers for the diagnosis of GCA.

DESIGN

Retrospective population-based cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy (TAB) from 01/01/1995 through 12/31/2019 in Olmsted County, Minnesota were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). Subjects were categorized as GCA or non-GCA using the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for GCA.

TESTING

Sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and platelets for a positive GCA diagnosis were calculated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

GCA diagnosis.

RESULTS

There were 553 patients who underwent TAB, 143 with GCA and 410 without GCA. Median age at time of TAB was 75 years (IQR 69-81) and 372 (67%) were female. Patients with GCA had higher CRP (91.1 vs 49.1 mg/L, P < .001), ESR (66.4 vs 52.0 mm/hr, P < .001), and platelets (370.5 vs 283.1 × 10/L, P < .001) than patients in the non-GCA cohort. Sensitivity was 96% for CRP, 80% for ESR, and 49% for platelets. Specificity was 21% for CRP, 43% for ESR, and 79% for platelets. Combined ESR and CRP had a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 54% while combined ESR, CRP, and platelets had a sensitivity of 41% and specificity of 84%. Normal inflammatory markers, including ESR, CRP, and platelets, were observed in 2 (3%) GCA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study evaluated the performance of various inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of GCA. Inflammatory markers are helpful in the diagnosis of GCA, but normal values do not exclude the diagnosis.

摘要

目的

确定各种炎症标志物用于诊断巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)的基于人群的敏感性和特异性。

设计

基于人群的回顾性横断面研究。

参与者

利用罗切斯特流行病学项目(REP)确定1995年1月1日至2019年12月31日在明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县接受颞动脉活检(TAB)的患者。根据1990年美国风湿病学会GCA分类标准将受试者分为GCA组或非GCA组。

检测

计算C反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和血小板对GCA阳性诊断的敏感性和特异性。

主要观察指标

GCA诊断。

结果

553例患者接受了TAB,143例为GCA患者,410例为非GCA患者。TAB时的中位年龄为75岁(四分位间距69 - 81岁),372例(67%)为女性。GCA患者的CRP(91.1对49.1mg/L,P <.001)、ESR(66.4对52.0mm/hr,P <.001)和血小板(370.5对283.1×10/L,P <.001)均高于非GCA队列中的患者。CRP的敏感性为96%,ESR为80%,血小板为49%。CRP的特异性为21%,ESR为43%,血小板为79%。ESR和CRP联合的敏感性为77%,特异性为54%;而ESR、CRP和血小板联合的敏感性为41%,特异性为84%。在2例(3%)GCA患者中观察到正常的炎症标志物,包括ESR、CRP和血小板。

结论

这项基于人群的研究评估了各种炎症标志物在GCA诊断中的表现。炎症标志物有助于GCA的诊断,但正常数值并不能排除诊断。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验