Unverferth D V, Leier C V, Balcerzak S P, Hamlin R L
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Jul 1;56(1):157-61. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90585-5.
This study was designed to investigate whether either of 2 dosage schedules of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was effective in preventing chronic doxorubicin-induced heart failure in dogs. Thirty-eight dogs were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: controls, 10 dogs; doxorubicin only, 12 dogs; doxorubicin + low dose NAC, 8 dogs; and doxorubicin + high dose NAC, 8 dogs. All dogs except the controls received 1 mg/kg of doxorubicin weekly for 8 weeks and then every other week for 8 weeks. The doxorubicin + low-dose NAC group received 140 mg/kg of NAC 30 minutes before each dose of doxorubicin. The doxorubicin + high-dose NAC group received NAC before and then twice a day for 5 days. Systolic time intervals and echocardiograms were obtained weekly; cardiac catheterization was performed at the conclusion of the study. Of the 38 dogs in the study, 9 died; all deaths were in the doxorubicin treatment groups. The incidence of death was not different between the doxorubicin-only, the doxorubicin + low-dose and the doxorubicin + high-dose NAC groups. The noninvasive and the invasive and the catheterization data generally revealed poorer cardiac function of the doxorubicin treatment groups than in controls. However, no significant differences existed between the doxorubicin-only and doxorubicin + low-dose and doxorubicin + high-dose NAC groups. In conclusion, NAC in a low- or high-dose regimen did not significantly ameliorate doxorubicin cardiac toxicity. Because NAC is a free radical scavenger, perhaps doxorubicin cardiac toxicity is not a result of free radical generation.
本研究旨在调查两种剂量方案的N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)是否能有效预防犬慢性阿霉素诱导的心力衰竭。38只犬被随机分为4组中的1组:对照组,10只犬;仅阿霉素组,12只犬;阿霉素+低剂量NAC组,8只犬;阿霉素+高剂量NAC组,8只犬。除对照组外,所有犬每周接受1mg/kg阿霉素,共8周,然后每两周接受一次,共8周。阿霉素+低剂量NAC组在每次阿霉素给药前30分钟接受140mg/kg NAC。阿霉素+高剂量NAC组在阿霉素给药前接受NAC,然后每天两次,共5天。每周获取收缩期时间间隔和超声心动图;在研究结束时进行心脏导管插入术。研究中的38只犬中有9只死亡;所有死亡均发生在阿霉素治疗组。仅阿霉素组、阿霉素+低剂量组和阿霉素+高剂量NAC组之间的死亡率没有差异。非侵入性、侵入性和导管插入术数据总体显示,阿霉素治疗组的心脏功能比对照组差。然而,仅阿霉素组与阿霉素+低剂量组和阿霉素+高剂量NAC组之间没有显著差异。总之,低剂量或高剂量方案的NAC并不能显著改善阿霉素的心脏毒性。由于NAC是一种自由基清除剂,或许阿霉素的心脏毒性不是自由基生成的结果。