Comparison of methods for detecting mandibular lingula and can antilingula be used in lingula mandibula detection?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between anatomical reference points used during orthognathic surgery and to minimize the risks of iatrogenic neurovascular damage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images involving the mandible from patients who visited Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Faculty of Dentistry between January 2018 and September 2023. The age range of the included individuals was set between 18 and 80 years. Horizontal and vertical distances between mandibular anatomical structures, such as the lingula mandibula (LM), mandibular foramen (MF), antilingula (AL), and surrounding structures were measured using CBCT software. Individuals with intraosseous pathology, insufficient image quality, or a history of surgical/orthodontic treatment were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A total of 240 hemimandibles from 120 patients were analyzed (55.83% female, 44.17% male; mean age: 46.78 ± 15.30 years). Significant differences were identified in LM positions according to different AL types. The LM was found to be more inferior and posterior relative to hill and ridge type ALs, while it was more anterior relative to plateau type ALs. In 26.25% of mandibular rami, AL was not detected.

CONCLUSION

The position of the AL can serve as a guide in determining the osteotomy line during inferior vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). However, relying solely on AL as a reference point may increase the risk of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. Preoperative tomographic evaluations to determine the relationships among LM, MF, and AL can provide a safer approach in surgical planning, reduce complications, and help protect neurovascular structures.