Miltz Ada R, Sewell Janey, Nakagawa Fumiyo, Rein Sophia M, Sherr Lorraine, Rodger Alison, Phillips Andrew N, vanLuenen Sanne, Garnefski Nadia, Kraaij Vivian, Smith Colette J, Cambiano Valentina, Lampe Fiona C
Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2025 Apr;28(4):e26424. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26424.
There is a need to synthesize recent evidence on the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions to improve mental health, quality of life and wellbeing in adults living with HIV in high-income countries. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to address this research gap.
Medline, Embase, Psychinfo and Web of science were searched (from 2008 to December 2023). In total, 67 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychosocial intervention among adults living with HIV in high-income countries were eligible.
In the meta-analysis, there was an overall positive effect of interventions on reducing depression (N = 40; standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.19 [95% CI: -0.29, -0.10]), anxiety (N = 15; SMD -0.12 [-0.23, -0.02]), stress (N = 13; SMD -0.22 [-0.41, -0.04]), and other measures of poor wellbeing (N = 19; SMD -0.18 [-0.35, -0.02]) and increasing levels of coping/self-efficacy (N = 8; SMD 0.17 [0.04, 0.31]). For depression, interventions that used symptom screening above a threshold score to identify eligible individuals were more effective than those without such an eligibility criterion (SMD -0.29 vs. -0.10, p = 0.023). Interventions compared to standard care controls had a greater effect on depression versus interventions compared to not standard care controls, when the latter category included standard care controls that received intentional support (SMD -0.28 vs. -0.11, p = 0.035). There was also weak evidence of an overall positive effect on: reducing stigma (N = 7; SMD -0.17 [-0.35, 0.02]), and improving social support/participation (N = 6; SMD 0.17 [-0.02, 0.35]), mental health quality of life (N = 12; SMD 0.09 [-0.01, 0.19]), physical health quality of life (N = 11; SMD 0.07 [-0.02, 0.16]) and quality of social life (N = 6; SMD 0.10 [-0.04, 0.24]). There was no evidence found for an effect on loneliness, although data were limited.
Pooled effect estimates were small or small tomoderate. In line with previous literature, there was no evidence of differential effects on depression according to the intervention type (psychotherapeutic vs. other).
Evidence from RCTs suggest that psychosocial interventions are effective in improving mental health for adults living with HIV in high-income settings. Interventions were more effective at reducing depression when targeted at those screening positive for mental health symptoms and when compared to a standard care only control group. There was some evidence that longer, more intensive interventions were more effective.
有必要综合近期关于心理社会干预措施有效性的证据,这些措施旨在改善高收入国家感染艾滋病毒成年人的心理健康、生活质量和幸福感。为此进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以填补这一研究空白。
检索了Medline、Embase、Psychinfo和科学网(检索时间为2008年至2023年12月)。共有67项针对高收入国家感染艾滋病毒成年人的心理社会干预随机对照试验(RCT)符合条件。
在荟萃分析中,干预措施在减轻抑郁(N = 40;标准化均数差[SMD] -0.19 [95%置信区间:-0.29,-0.10])、焦虑(N = 15;SMD -0.12 [-0.23,-0.02])、压力(N = 13;SMD -0.22 [-0.41,-0.04])以及其他幸福感较差指标(N = 19;SMD -0.18 [-0.35,-0.02])方面总体具有积极效果,并能提高应对能力/自我效能水平(N = 8;SMD 0.17 [0.04,0.31])。对于抑郁,使用高于阈值分数的症状筛查来确定合格个体的干预措施比没有此类合格标准的干预措施更有效(SMD -0.29对-0.10,p = 0.023)。与标准护理对照相比的干预措施对抑郁的影响大于与非标准护理对照相比的干预措施,当后者类别包括接受有意支持的标准护理对照时(SMD -0.28对-0.11,p = 0.035)。也有微弱证据表明在以下方面总体具有积极效果:减少耻辱感(N = 7;SMD -0.17 [-0.35,0.02])、改善社会支持/参与(N = 6;SMD 0.17 [-0.02,0.35])、心理健康生活质量(N = 12;SMD 0.09 [-0.01,0.19])、身体健康生活质量(N = 11;SMD 0.07 [-0.02,0.16])和社会生活质量(N = 6;SMD 0.10 [-0.04,0.24])。尽管数据有限,但未发现对孤独感有影响的证据。
合并效应估计值较小或小到中等。与先前文献一致,没有证据表明根据干预类型(心理治疗与其他)对抑郁有不同影响。
随机对照试验的证据表明,心理社会干预措施对改善高收入环境中感染艾滋病毒成年人的心理健康有效。当针对心理健康症状筛查呈阳性的人群以及与仅标准护理对照组相比时,干预措施在减轻抑郁方面更有效。有一些证据表明,更长时间、更密集的干预措施更有效。