Suppr超能文献

ProTaper Ultimate与五种多锉系统的比较分析:设计、冶金学与机械性能

A Comparative Analysis of ProTaper Ultimate and Five Multifile Systems: Design, Metallurgy, and Mechanical Performance.

作者信息

Martins Jorge N R, Silva Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal, Vieira Victor Talarico Leal, Pereira da Costa Rui, Baruwa Abayomi O, Fernandes Francisco Manuel Braz, Versiani Marco Aurélio

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, 1600-277 Lisboa, Portugal.

LIBPhys-FCT UID/FIS/04559/2013, 1600-277 Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;18(6):1260. doi: 10.3390/ma18061260.

Abstract

The present research compared the design, metallurgical properties, and mechanical characteristics of the ProTaper Ultimate instruments with five multifile systems. A total of 469 new nickel-titanium rotary finishing instruments, all 25 mm in length but varying in size, taper, and metal alloy composition, from six different multifile systems (ProTaper Ultimate, ProTaper Next, ProFile, Mtwo, EndoSequence, and GT Series X), were inspected for irregularities and analyzed for their spiral density (spirals per millimetre), blade design, surface finishing, alloy composition, phase transformation temperatures, and mechanical performance (microhardness, torsional, and bending resistance tests). Group comparisons were performed using Kruskal-Wallis and one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's tests (α = 5%). ProFile instruments exhibited a greater number of spirals and a higher density of spirals per millimetre compared to the other systems. Microscopic analysis revealed distinct tip geometries and blade designs among tested instruments. All of them displayed parallel marks from the machining process, but the EndoSequence system had the smoothest surface finish. The alloys of all instruments consisted of an almost equiatomic ratio of nickel to titanium. At the testing temperature, the ProTaper Ultimate system exhibited a complete R-phase crystallographic arrangement, while the ProFile and Mtwo systems were fully austenitic. The ProTaper Ultimate F2, F3, and FX instruments demonstrated the highest maximum torque values (1.40, 1.45, and 3.55 N.cm, respectively) and the lowest maximum bending loads (202.7, 254.9, and 408.4 gf, respectively). EndoSequence instruments showed the highest angles of rotation, while the highest microhardness values were recorded for GT Series X (407.1 HVN) and ProTaper Next (425.0 HVN) instruments. The ProTaper Ultimate system showed a high spiral density per millimetre and a complete R-phase crystallographic arrangement at room temperature, which significantly contributed to its superior flexibility and torsional strength when compared to the other tested systems.

摘要

本研究比较了ProTaper Ultimate器械与五种多锉系统的设计、冶金性能和机械特性。共有来自六种不同多锉系统(ProTaper Ultimate、ProTaper Next、ProFile、Mtwo、EndoSequence和GT Series X)的469支新型镍钛旋转精修器械接受检查,所有器械长度均为25 mm,但尺寸、锥度和金属合金成分各不相同,检查其有无不规则之处,并分析其螺旋密度(每毫米螺旋数)、刃部设计、表面光洁度、合金成分、相变温度和机械性能(显微硬度、扭转和抗弯强度测试)。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和单因素方差分析以及事后Tukey检验进行组间比较(α = 5%)。与其他系统相比,ProFile器械每毫米的螺旋数量更多且螺旋密度更高。显微镜分析显示,受试器械之间的尖端几何形状和刃部设计各不相同。所有器械都有加工过程留下的平行痕迹,但EndoSequence系统的表面光洁度最光滑。所有器械的合金中镍与钛的比例几乎为等原子比。在测试温度下,ProTaper Ultimate系统呈现出完整的R相晶体结构排列,而ProFile和Mtwo系统则完全为奥氏体结构。ProTaper Ultimate F2、F3和FX器械分别显示出最高的最大扭矩值(分别为1.40、1.45和3.55 N.cm)和最低的最大弯曲载荷(分别为202.7、254.9和408.4 gf)。EndoSequence器械的旋转角度最高,而GT Series X器械(407.1 HVN)和ProTaper Next器械(425.0 HVN)的显微硬度值最高。ProTaper Ultimate系统在室温下每毫米的螺旋密度高且呈现完整的R相晶体结构排列,与其他受试系统相比,这显著有助于其卓越的柔韧性和扭转强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ec0/11943969/df8c4d03c568/materials-18-01260-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验