Lee Jane, Kim Hyeon-Cheol, Kirkpatrick Timothy, Jaramillo David E, Kwak Sang Won, Jeong Ji Wook
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;18(6):1265. doi: 10.3390/ma18061265.
Recently, the single-cone hydraulic canal filling technique using bioceramic sealers was found to hinder retreatment due to the mechanical properties of the bioceramic sealers. This study assessed the effectiveness of four nickel-titanium rotary files in removing gutta-percha and bioceramic sealer from molar root canals in vitro. Eighty-eight root canals from extracted molars were instrumented with Vortex Blue rotary files and filled with gutta-percha and bioceramic sealer using a single-cone technique. After 30 days, the filled canals were randomly divided into four groups according to the file used for re-instrumentation: ProTaper Gold (PTG), Endo ReStart (ERS), XP-3D Shaper (XPD), and HyFlex Remover (HFR). This study assessed whether root canal filling material removal and patency were achieved within a 10-min time frame, recording the time required in seconds. The rate of regaining patency and the time required to achieve patency were compared among groups using a generalized linear model. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate the mechanical changes to the files after use. The patency rate of XPD and HFR was significantly higher than PTG. ERS and XPD demonstrated shorter patency times than HFR and significantly shorter patency times than PTG. SEM images revealed a varied range of reverse windings across file groups. PTG and ERS exhibited microcracks and fractured tips, while XPD and HFR did not display these mechanical alterations. The four file systems in this study displayed varying levels of effectiveness in the retreatment of root canals filled with bioceramic sealers.
最近,人们发现使用生物陶瓷封闭剂的单锥液压根管充填技术会因生物陶瓷封闭剂的机械性能而阻碍再治疗。本研究评估了四种镍钛旋转锉在体外从磨牙根管中去除牙胶和生物陶瓷封闭剂的有效性。从拔除的磨牙中选取88个根管,用Vortex Blue旋转锉进行预备,然后采用单锥技术用牙胶和生物陶瓷封闭剂充填。30天后,根据用于再次预备的锉将充填后的根管随机分为四组:ProTaper Gold(PTG)、Endo ReStart(ERS)、XP-3D Shaper(XPD)和HyFlex Remover(HFR)。本研究评估了在10分钟内是否能实现根管充填材料的去除和通畅,并记录所需时间(以秒为单位)。使用广义线性模型比较各组恢复通畅的速率和实现通畅所需的时间。使用扫描电子显微镜评估使用后锉的机械变化。XPD和HFR的通畅率显著高于PTG。ERS和XPD的通畅时间比HFR短,且比PTG显著短。扫描电子显微镜图像显示各锉组的反向缠绕范围各不相同。PTG和ERS出现微裂纹和尖端断裂,而XPD和HFR未显示这些机械改变。本研究中的四种锉系统在对用生物陶瓷封闭剂充填的根管进行再治疗时显示出不同程度的有效性。