• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化算法和计算复杂度对混凝土配合比设计中混凝土抗压强度预测机器学习模型的影响

Influence of Optimization Algorithms and Computational Complexity on Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction Machine Learning Models for Concrete Mix Design.

作者信息

Ziolkowski Patryk

机构信息

Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;18(6):1386. doi: 10.3390/ma18061386.

DOI:10.3390/ma18061386
PMID:40141669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11944114/
Abstract

The proper design of concrete mixtures is a critical task in concrete technology, where optimal strength, eco-friendliness, and production efficiency are increasingly demanded. While traditional analytical methods, such as the Three Equations Method, offer foundational approaches to mix design, they often fall short in handling the complexity of modern concrete technology. Machine learning-based models have demonstrated notable efficacy in predicting concrete compressive strength, addressing the limitations of conventional methods. This study builds on previous research by investigating not only the impact of computational complexity on the predictive performance of machine learning models but also the influence of different optimization algorithms. The study evaluates the effectiveness of three optimization techniques: the Quasi-Newton Method (QNM), the Adaptive Moment Estimation (ADAM) algorithm, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). A total of forty-five deep neural network models of varying computational complexity were trained and tested using a comprehensive database of concrete mix designs and their corresponding compressive strength test results. The findings reveal a significant interaction between optimization algorithms and model complexity in enhancing prediction accuracy. Models utilizing the QNM algorithm outperformed those using the ADAM and SGD in terms of error reduction (SSE, MSE, RMSE, NSE, and ME) and increased coefficient of determination (R). These insights contribute to the development of more accurate and efficient AI-driven methods in concrete mix design, promoting the advancement of concrete technology and the potential for future research in this domain.

摘要

混凝土配合比的合理设计是混凝土技术中的一项关键任务,在这一领域,人们对最佳强度、生态友好性和生产效率的要求日益提高。虽然传统的分析方法,如三方程法,为配合比设计提供了基础方法,但它们在处理现代混凝土技术的复杂性方面往往存在不足。基于机器学习的模型在预测混凝土抗压强度方面已显示出显著效果,克服了传统方法的局限性。本研究在先前研究的基础上,不仅研究了计算复杂性对机器学习模型预测性能的影响,还研究了不同优化算法的影响。该研究评估了三种优化技术的有效性:拟牛顿法(QNM)、自适应矩估计(ADAM)算法和随机梯度下降(SGD)。使用混凝土配合比设计及其相应抗压强度试验结果的综合数据库,对总共45个计算复杂性不同的深度神经网络模型进行了训练和测试。研究结果表明,优化算法与模型复杂性之间在提高预测准确性方面存在显著的相互作用。在减少误差(SSE、MSE、RMSE、NSE和ME)和提高决定系数(R)方面,采用QNM算法的模型优于采用ADAM和SGD算法的模型。这些见解有助于在混凝土配合比设计中开发更准确、高效的人工智能驱动方法,推动混凝土技术的进步以及该领域未来研究的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/569f3d81ef99/materials-18-01386-g013a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/c172e0df006d/materials-18-01386-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/9aa98e2ad983/materials-18-01386-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/2b0b6a284836/materials-18-01386-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/63029298e1d7/materials-18-01386-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/def09856beae/materials-18-01386-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/9447d1f1ec2b/materials-18-01386-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/a3f7e0b536cf/materials-18-01386-g007a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/be2f04cdb132/materials-18-01386-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/06c9c30a089c/materials-18-01386-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/0cd0bc40af7b/materials-18-01386-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/4b3f0948bac8/materials-18-01386-g011a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/b8e89350d0d4/materials-18-01386-g012a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/569f3d81ef99/materials-18-01386-g013a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/c172e0df006d/materials-18-01386-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/9aa98e2ad983/materials-18-01386-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/2b0b6a284836/materials-18-01386-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/63029298e1d7/materials-18-01386-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/def09856beae/materials-18-01386-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/9447d1f1ec2b/materials-18-01386-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/a3f7e0b536cf/materials-18-01386-g007a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/be2f04cdb132/materials-18-01386-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/06c9c30a089c/materials-18-01386-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/0cd0bc40af7b/materials-18-01386-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/4b3f0948bac8/materials-18-01386-g011a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/b8e89350d0d4/materials-18-01386-g012a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/959f/11944114/569f3d81ef99/materials-18-01386-g013a.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of Optimization Algorithms and Computational Complexity on Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction Machine Learning Models for Concrete Mix Design.优化算法和计算复杂度对混凝土配合比设计中混凝土抗压强度预测机器学习模型的影响
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;18(6):1386. doi: 10.3390/ma18061386.
2
Computational Complexity and Its Influence on Predictive Capabilities of Machine Learning Models for Concrete Mix Design.计算复杂性及其对混凝土配合比设计机器学习模型预测能力的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;16(17):5956. doi: 10.3390/ma16175956.
3
Evaluating the impact of waste marble on the compressive strength of traditional concrete using machine learning.利用机器学习评估废弃大理石对传统混凝土抗压强度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98431-z.
4
Improved prediction accuracy for compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete using optimization-based algorithms and cascade forward neural network.基于优化算法和级联前馈神经网络的再生骨料混凝土抗压强度预测精度的改进。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;371:123068. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123068. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
5
Advanced Predictive Modeling of Concrete Compressive Strength and Slump Characteristics: A Comparative Evaluation of BPNN, SVM, and RF Models Optimized via PSO.混凝土抗压强度和坍落度特性的高级预测建模:通过粒子群优化算法优化的反向传播神经网络、支持向量机和随机森林模型的比较评估
Materials (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;17(19):4791. doi: 10.3390/ma17194791.
6
Model-Based Adaptive Machine Learning Approach in Concrete Mix Design.混凝土配合比设计中基于模型的自适应机器学习方法。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 28;14(7):1661. doi: 10.3390/ma14071661.
7
Concrete compressive strength prediction modeling utilizing deep learning long short-term memory algorithm for a sustainable environment.利用深度学习长短期记忆算法进行可持续环境下的混凝土抗压强度预测建模。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):30294-30302. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12877-y. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Estimation of concrete materials uniaxial compressive strength using soft computing techniques.使用软计算技术估算混凝土材料的单轴抗压强度。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 19;9(11):e22502. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22502. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Modeling the compressive strength behavior of concrete reinforced with basalt fiber.玄武岩纤维增强混凝土抗压强度性能建模
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96343-6.
10
Evaluating the strength of industrial wastesbased concrete reinforced with steel fiber using advanced machine learning.使用先进机器学习评估钢纤维增强工业废料基混凝土的强度
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 8;15(1):8082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92194-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation metrics and statistical tests for machine learning.机器学习的评估指标和统计检验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 13;14(1):6086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56706-x.
2
On the different regimes of stochastic gradient descent.论随机梯度下降的不同机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Feb 27;121(9):e2316301121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2316301121. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
3
Decision tree models for the estimation of geo-polymer concrete compressive strength.用于估算地质聚合物混凝土抗压强度的决策树模型。
Math Biosci Eng. 2024 Jan;21(1):1413-1444. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024061. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Effects of aggregate sizes on the performance of laterized concrete.集料尺寸对红土化混凝土性能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):448. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50998-1.
5
Evaluation of Durability Performance for Chloride Ingress Considering Long-Term Aged GGBFS and FA Concrete and Analysis of the Relationship between Concrete Mixture Characteristic and Passed Charge Using Machine Learning Algorithm.考虑长期老化矿渣粉和粉煤灰混凝土的氯离子侵入耐久性性能评估以及使用机器学习算法分析混凝土混合料特性与通过电量之间的关系。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;16(23):7459. doi: 10.3390/ma16237459.
6
Computational Complexity and Its Influence on Predictive Capabilities of Machine Learning Models for Concrete Mix Design.计算复杂性及其对混凝土配合比设计机器学习模型预测能力的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;16(17):5956. doi: 10.3390/ma16175956.
7
Hybrid Cements: Mechanical Properties, Microstructure and Radiological Behavior.混合水泥:力学性能、微观结构和放射行为。
Molecules. 2022 Jan 13;27(2):498. doi: 10.3390/molecules27020498.
8
Concrete Strengthening by Introducing Polymer-Based Additives into the Cement Matrix-A Mini Review.通过在水泥基体中引入聚合物基添加剂增强混凝土——一篇综述短文
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;14(20):6071. doi: 10.3390/ma14206071.
9
Activated Gradients for Deep Neural Networks.激活梯度在深度神经网络中的应用。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2023 Apr;34(4):2156-2168. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3106044. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
10
Model-Based Adaptive Machine Learning Approach in Concrete Mix Design.混凝土配合比设计中基于模型的自适应机器学习方法。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 28;14(7):1661. doi: 10.3390/ma14071661.