Onyelowe Kennedy C, Kamchoom Viroon, Ebid Ahmed M, Hanandeh Shadi, Zurita Polo Susana Monserrat, Zabala Vizuete Rolando Fabián, Santillán Murillo Rodney Orlando, Torres Castillo Rolando Marcel, Avudaiappan Siva
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Eng & Eng Technology, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Nigeria.
Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98431-z.
Waste marble, an industrial byproduct generated from marble cutting and polishing processes, can be effectively utilized as a partial replacement in concrete mixtures. Incorporating waste marble in concrete not only addresses environmental concerns related to marble waste disposal but also contributes to the sustainability of construction materials. Using machine learning (ML) to predict the impact of waste marble on the compressive strength of traditional concrete offers several advantages over repeated laboratory experiments. ML offers a powerful alternative to costly and time-consuming laboratory experiments, enabling faster and more sustainable exploration of the potential of waste marble in improving concrete's compressive strength. This research has focused on evaluating the impact of waste marble on the compressive strength of traditional concrete using machine learning (ML). Advanced ML techniques such as the Group Methods Data Handling Neural Network (GMDH-NN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), K-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) have been applied in this research work. The GMDH-NN model was created using GMDH Shell 3.0 software, while AdaBoost, SVR and kNN models were created using "Orange Data Mining" software version 3.36. Error indices such as the sum of squared error (SSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and Error (%), and performance metrics such as Accuracy % and the R between predicted and calculated compressive strength parameters were used to evaluate the overall behavior of the models. Finally, the Hoffman sensitivity analysis procedure was applied to determine the individual relative impact of the input variables on the output. At the end of the processes, a total of 1135 waste marble concrete entries were collected containing constituents such as the cement density (C), waste marble (WM), fine aggregate (FAg), coarse aggregate (CAg), water (W), superplasticizer (PL) and curing age (Age) used as input variables of the waste marble concrete model. The records were divided into training set (900 records = 80%) and validation set (235 records = 20%) following standard partitioning pattern reported in the literature. The kNN and AdaBoost, with SSE of 1408.5 MPa and 1397 MPa respectively and a tie Accuracy of 95.5% and R of 0.985 showed the best models suggesting excellent model performance while GMDH-NN showed the worst. Conversely, RF balances accuracy and model complexity, making it a practical alternative to kNN and AdaBoost. And lastly, Age, Coarse Aggregates, Water, and Plasticizer play the most significant roles in determining the compressive strength, while Cement, Waste Marble, and Fine Aggregates have comparatively smaller impacts. However, considering the standard proportion required for waste marble powder to replace cement, it showed a remarkable influence on the behavior of the concrete thus a recommended potential for its used as replacement for cement.
废弃大理石是大理石切割和抛光过程中产生的工业副产品,可有效用作混凝土混合物的部分替代品。在混凝土中掺入废弃大理石不仅解决了与大理石废料处理相关的环境问题,还有助于建筑材料的可持续性。与反复进行实验室实验相比,使用机器学习(ML)预测废弃大理石对传统混凝土抗压强度的影响具有多个优势。机器学习为成本高昂且耗时的实验室实验提供了强大的替代方案,能够更快、更可持续地探索废弃大理石在提高混凝土抗压强度方面的潜力。本研究专注于使用机器学习(ML)评估废弃大理石对传统混凝土抗压强度的影响。先进的机器学习技术,如数据处理分组神经网络(GMDH-NN)、支持向量回归(SVR)、K近邻(kNN)和自适应提升(AdaBoost)已应用于本研究工作。GMDH-NN模型使用GMDH Shell 3.0软件创建,而AdaBoost、SVR和kNN模型使用“Orange数据挖掘”软件版本3.36创建。误差指标,如平方误差总和(SSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方误差(MSE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和误差(%),以及性能指标,如准确率%和预测与计算的抗压强度参数之间的R值,用于评估模型的整体性能。最后,应用霍夫曼敏感性分析程序来确定输入变量对输出的个体相对影响。在这些过程结束时,总共收集了1135个废弃大理石混凝土样本,其中包含水泥密度(C)、废弃大理石(WM)、细骨料(FAg)、粗骨料(CAg)、水(W)、高效减水剂(PL)和养护龄期(Age)等成分,用作废弃大理石混凝土模型的输入变量。按照文献中报道的标准划分模式,将记录分为训练集(900条记录 = 80%)和验证集(235条记录 = 20%)。kNN和AdaBoost的SSE分别为1408.5 MPa和1397 MPa,平局准确率为95.5%,R值为0.985,显示出最佳模型性能,表明模型表现出色,而GMDH-NN表现最差。相反,随机森林(RF)平衡了准确率和模型复杂度,使其成为kNN和AdaBoost的实用替代方案。最后,养护龄期、粗骨料、水和减水剂在确定抗压强度方面起最重要作用,而水泥、废弃大理石和细骨料的影响相对较小。然而,考虑到废弃大理石粉替代水泥所需的标准比例,它对混凝土性能有显著影响,因此具有用作水泥替代品的推荐潜力。