Wen Chong Jie, Ahmad Mohd Faizal, Abu Muhammad Azrai, Johari Nalisa Shamyra, Badaruddin Izzatul Aliaa, Azhar Shah Shamsul, Abdul Karim Abdul Kadir
Advanced Reproductive Centre (ARC), Hospital Canselor Tuanku Mukhriz (HCTM), Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;15(3):383. doi: 10.3390/life15030383.
Evaluating the AMH level and AFC are crucial in infertility practice. Thus, accurate measurement is paramount. Various methods are available and selecting the right process is essential to ensure good reproducibility and precise results. Thus, our study aims to determine the analytical performance of AMH Plus and AFIAS-AMH and the correlation between the two AMH assays and AFC values.
A prospective study was conducted at the Advanced Reproductive Center, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Mukhriz (HCTM), Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, to compare the correlation between the AMH assay methods and AFCs. It included 100 patients from Feb 2024 until June 2024.
A total of 100 women with infertility, with a mean age of 35.87 ± 3.92, were included in our study. Our results revealed a strong positive correlation between the two AMH assays, with the comparable performance of AMH Plus and AFIAS-AMH. We also found that the serum AMH evaluation was comparable with the routine AFC assessment.
Our findings indicated that serum AMH levels determine the association between AMH levels and follicle counts and the correlation between AMH concentrations and assays. Our study demonstrated the competent repeatability, acceptable linearity, and laboratory precision of the AFIAS-AMH test and comparative assessment of the AFC and serum AMH evaluation.
在不孕症诊疗中,评估抗缪勒管激素(AMH)水平和窦卵泡计数(AFC)至关重要。因此,准确测量至关重要。有多种方法可供选择,选择正确的流程对于确保良好的可重复性和精确结果至关重要。因此,我们的研究旨在确定AMH Plus和AFIAS - AMH的分析性能以及两种AMH检测方法与AFC值之间的相关性。
在马来西亚国立大学医学院敦库·穆赫里兹医院(HCTM)高级生殖中心进行了一项前瞻性研究,以比较AMH检测方法与AFC之间的相关性。研究纳入了2024年2月至2024年6月期间的100名患者。
我们的研究共纳入了100名不孕症女性,平均年龄为35.87±3.92岁。我们的结果显示,两种AMH检测方法之间存在强正相关,AMH Plus和AFIAS - AMH表现相当。我们还发现血清AMH评估与常规AFC评估相当。
我们的研究结果表明,血清AMH水平决定了AMH水平与卵泡计数之间的关联以及AMH浓度与检测方法之间的相关性。我们的研究证明了AFIAS - AMH检测具有良好的重复性、可接受的线性以及实验室精密度,并对AFC和血清AMH评估进行了比较。