Suppr超能文献

计算机辅助电话访谈与纸质电话访谈的比较。

A comparison of computer-assisted and hard copy telephone interviewing.

作者信息

Harlow B L, Rosenthal J F, Ziegler R G

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Aug;122(2):335-40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114105.

Abstract

In computer-assisted telephone interviewing, questions are displayed on a computer screen, and responses are entered directly into a computerized data file. In 1981-1982, a randomized trial of computer-assisted telephone interviewing, compared with telephone interviewing with responses directly recorded on printed questionnaires, was carried out. The respondents were surrogates for 400 white Florida residents who died in 1979 and were randomly selected from a death certificate-based case-control study of colorectal cancer. Outcomes examined included participation rate after initial phone contact, length of interview, recorded number of comments, recorded number of probes, unresolved "don't know" responses, and the interviewer's evaluation of the quality of the interview. The computer-assisted telephone interviewing system resulted in the 25-30-minute interviews lasting, on the average, 3.4 minutes (14%) longer. The average number of comments decreased from 5.5 to 4.1 (a 25% difference) and probes from 10.2 to 8.3 (a 19% difference) in the computer-assisted interviews. These differences were markedly smaller than the differences noted between individual interviewers.

摘要

在计算机辅助电话访谈中,问题显示在电脑屏幕上,回答则直接录入计算机化的数据文件。1981年至1982年,进行了一项计算机辅助电话访谈的随机试验,将其与直接在印刷问卷上记录回答的电话访谈进行比较。受访者是400名1979年去世的佛罗里达州白人居民的代理人,他们是从一项基于死亡证明的结直肠癌病例对照研究中随机选取的。所考察的结果包括首次电话联系后的参与率、访谈时长、记录的评论数量、记录的追问数量、未解决的“不知道”回答,以及访谈者对访谈质量的评估。计算机辅助电话访谈系统使得原本25至30分钟的访谈平均延长了3.4分钟(14%)。在计算机辅助访谈中,评论的平均数量从5.5条降至4.1条(相差25%),追问数量从10.2次降至8.3次(相差19%)。这些差异明显小于不同访谈者之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验