Slade G D, Brennan D, Spencer A J
AIHW Dental Statistics and Research Unit, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
Aust Dent J. 1995 Oct;40(5):306-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb04818.x.
Despite the reported benefits of computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) methods, experiences from their use in Australian oral health surveys have not been described. This report aimed to present methodological aspects of a CATI survey conducted in the five mainland states. A response rate of 66 per cent was obtained, yielding 4050 completed interviews. Analysis revealed generally small levels of non-response bias: persons who avoided or delayed dental treatment because of cost and non-health card holders were harder to contact, while non-English speakers and persons aged 20-29 years were less likely to participate. A total of 1770 person hours of interview time was spent on the survey: 64.5 per cent of that time was spent on the telephone with an average of 10 minutes 17 seconds per call (13 minutes 37 seconds per completed call). Only seven questions had missing data for more than 1 per cent of respondents. Comprehension of questions and cooperation with the interview was rated by interviewers as 'good' or 'very good' for more than 90 per cent of respondents. The CATI method was highly efficient and yielded good quality data for the survey.
尽管有报道称计算机辅助电话访谈(CATI)方法有诸多益处,但在澳大利亚口腔健康调查中使用该方法的经验尚未得到描述。本报告旨在介绍在澳大利亚大陆五个州进行的一项CATI调查的方法学方面。获得了66%的回复率,共完成4050次访谈。分析显示,总体而言,无回应偏差水平较低:因费用问题而避免或推迟牙科治疗的人以及没有健康卡的人更难联系上,而不讲英语的人和20至29岁的人参与度较低。该调查总共花费了1770人时的访谈时间:其中64.5%的时间用于电话访谈,平均每次通话时长为10分17秒(每次完成访谈的通话时长为13分37秒)。只有7个问题的缺失数据超过了1%的受访者。对于超过90%的受访者,访谈员对问题理解和访谈配合情况的评价为“良好”或“非常好”。CATI方法效率很高,为该调查提供了高质量的数据。