Suppr超能文献

肺段切除术中节段间平面识别的切缘质量比较

Comparison of Margin Quality for Intersegmental Plan Identification in Pulmonary Segmentectomy.

作者信息

Gurz Selcuk, Sullu Yurdanur, Tomak Leman, Temel Necmiye Gul, Sengul Aysen

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun 55270, Turkey.

Department of Pathology, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun 55270, Turkey.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 19;61(3):535. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030535.

Abstract

Insufficient margin in lung cancer is associated with an increased locoregional recurrence rate. In pulmonary segmentectomy, two commonly used methods for identifying the intersegmental plane are inflation-deflation and indocyanine green dyeing. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods in terms of quality margins and to evaluate their superiority. A total of 63 patients who underwent segmentectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary nodules and underwent preoperative planning with 3D modeling between October 2020 and February 2024 were included in this study. The location of the nodule and the distance to the intersegmental margins were virtually measured preoperatively using an open-source 3D modeling system. Patients were grouped according to the method of identifying the intersegmental margins. Group 1 included segmentectomies performed by the inflation-deflation method (n = 42), and Group 2 included segmentectomies performed by systemic indocyanine green (ICG) injection (n = 21). The area where the histopathological nodule was measured closest to the intersegmental margin was recorded. Values within (+/-10 mm) compared to the value measured in the three-dimensional model were considered successful. The obtained data were statistically compared between the groups. There was no difference between the groups in terms of virtual and pathological margins. However, in terms of margin quality, the rate of deviation detected in the pathological margin compared to the measured virtual margin was significantly different between the groups ( = 0.04). Accordingly, the success rate was 64.3% in Group 1 and 90.5% in Group 2 ( = 0.05). In Group 1, the failure rate was highly against the adjacent parenchyma. There was no significant difference between the groups in the analysis of simple and complex segmentectomies. Intersegmental plane identification with indocyanine green increases the margin quality by defining resection margins closer to the virtual margins. In the inflation-deflation method, unnecessary parenchymal loss occurs due to disadvantages in identifying intersegmental margins.

摘要

肺癌手术切缘不足与局部区域复发率增加相关。在肺段切除术中,两种常用的识别段间平面的方法是膨胀-萎陷法和吲哚菁绿染色法。本研究的目的是比较这两种方法在切缘质量方面的差异,并评估它们的优越性。本研究纳入了2020年10月至2024年2月期间因肺结节接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺段切除术并通过三维建模进行术前规划的63例患者。术前使用开源三维建模系统虚拟测量结节的位置和到段间切缘的距离。根据识别段间切缘的方法对患者进行分组。第1组包括采用膨胀-萎陷法进行的肺段切除术(n = 42),第2组包括通过全身注射吲哚菁绿(ICG)进行的肺段切除术(n = 21)。记录组织病理学结节最接近段间切缘处的测量区域。与三维模型中测量值相比,(±10 mm)范围内的值被视为成功。对两组间获得的数据进行统计学比较。两组在虚拟切缘和病理切缘方面无差异。然而,在切缘质量方面,两组间病理切缘与测量的虚拟切缘相比检测到的偏差率有显著差异(= 0.04)。因此,第1组的成功率为64.3%,第2组为90.5%(= 0.05)。在第1组中,失败率主要针对相邻实质。在简单和复杂肺段切除术的分析中,两组间无显著差异。用吲哚菁绿识别段间平面通过定义更接近虚拟切缘的切除切缘来提高切缘质量。在膨胀-萎陷法中,由于识别段间切缘存在缺陷,会出现不必要的实质损失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca6/11943681/eec5055f531c/medicina-61-00535-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验