• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一体式亲水性丙烯酸人工晶状体在睫状沟植入的安全性

Safety of One-Piece Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses in the Ciliary Sulcus.

作者信息

Sharon Tal, Lippin Naama, Yehezkeli Veronika, Dar Nimrod, Belkin Avner, Assia Ehud I

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba 4428164, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):1972. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061972.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14061972
PMID:40142780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11943431/
Abstract

: this study aims to assess the safety of ciliary sulcus-placed hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs). In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients who underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of IOLs into the ciliary sulcus without suture fixation between 2014 and 2016 at the Meir Medical Center were included. Clinical outcomes were compared between one-piece (1P) hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (Seelens AF, Hanita Lenses, Kibbutz Hanita, Israel) and three-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs with PMMA haptics (3P) (MA60AC, Alcon Laboratories, USA). Thirty-eight eyes met the inclusion criteria and had ciliary sulcus IOLs implanted, twenty-three eyes with 1P hydrophilic (60.52%) and fifteen (39.47%) with 3P hydrophobic IOLs. Mean follow-up was 47.36 ± 7.25 months for the 1P group and 46.54 ± 9.82 months for the 3P group ( = 0.87). The mean peak IOP was higher in the 3P group ( = 0.038). No differences in the incidence of anterior uveitis or cystoid macula edema (CME) were detected between the groups ( > 0.05). None of the patients in our study developed uveitis, bleeding episodes, or required treatment for increased intraocular pressure, and no patient was diagnosed with uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome. Post-operative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was similar between the groups ( = 0.66). Hydrophilic IOLs can be safely placed in the ciliary sulcus and are non-inferior to the implantation of three-piece hydrophobic IOLs in the sulcus. In our cohort, with an average follow-up of approximately four years, no UGH was diagnosed, and none of the lenses were explanted.

摘要

本研究旨在评估睫状沟植入亲水性丙烯酸人工晶状体(IOL)的安全性。在这项回顾性队列研究中,纳入了2014年至2016年期间在梅尔医学中心连续接受超声乳化白内障吸除术并将IOL植入睫状沟且未进行缝线固定的患者。比较了一体式(1P)亲水性丙烯酸IOL(Seelens AF,哈尼塔镜片公司,以色列哈尼塔基布兹)和带有PMMA襻的三件式疏水性丙烯酸IOL(3P)(MA60AC,爱尔康实验室,美国)的临床结果。38只眼符合纳入标准并植入了睫状沟IOL,其中23只眼植入1P亲水性IOL(60.52%),15只眼(39.47%)植入3P疏水性IOL。1P组的平均随访时间为47.36±7.25个月,3P组为46.54±9.82个月(P = 0.87)。3P组的平均眼压峰值较高(P = 0.038)。两组之间前葡萄膜炎或黄斑囊样水肿(CME)的发生率无差异(P>0.05)。本研究中没有患者发生葡萄膜炎、出血事件或需要治疗眼压升高,也没有患者被诊断为葡萄膜炎-青光眼-前房积血(UGH)综合征。两组术后矫正远视力(CDVA)相似(P = 0.66)。亲水性IOL可安全地植入睫状沟,在睫状沟植入时不劣于三件式疏水性IOL。在我们的队列中,平均随访约四年,未诊断出UGH,且没有晶状体被取出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71a4/11943431/b3aafd5bbbe7/jcm-14-01972-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71a4/11943431/b3aafd5bbbe7/jcm-14-01972-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71a4/11943431/b3aafd5bbbe7/jcm-14-01972-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety of One-Piece Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses in the Ciliary Sulcus.一体式亲水性丙烯酸人工晶状体在睫状沟植入的安全性
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):1972. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061972.
2
Intermediate term follow-up after a single-piece-acrylic intraocular lens implantation in the ciliary sulcus- a cross-sectional study.睫状沟一体式丙烯酸酯人工晶状体植入术后的中期随访-一项横断面研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec 9;13:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-13-76.
3
Types of intraocular lenses for cataract surgery in eyes with uveitis.葡萄膜炎患者白内障手术中人工晶状体的类型
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 4;3(3):CD007284. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007284.pub2.
4
Pathologic assessment of complications with asymmetric or sulcus fixation of square-edged hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.方形边缘疏水性丙烯酸眼科人工晶状体非对称或嵴固定并发症的病理评估。
Ophthalmology. 2012 May;119(5):907-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.022. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
5
Complications of sulcus placement of single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses: recommendations for backup IOL implantation following posterior capsule rupture.单片丙烯酸酯人工晶状体沟内植入的并发症:后囊破裂后备用人工晶状体植入的建议。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Aug;35(8):1445-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.04.027.
6
[Comparison of postoperative results after implantation of hydrophilic acrylic or hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: data of one-year prospective clinical study].[亲水丙烯酸酯或疏水丙烯酸酯人工晶状体植入术后结果比较:一年前瞻性临床研究数据]
Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44(12):936-43.
7
Pigment dispersion glaucoma induced by the chafing effect of intraocular lens haptics in Asian eyes.亚洲人眼球中眼内镜片襻的摩擦效应对色素播散性青光眼的诱导作用。
Curr Eye Res. 2013 Mar;38(3):358-62. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.749502. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
8
Results of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group.亲水性丙烯酸酯、疏水性丙烯酸酯和硅酮人工晶状体在葡萄膜炎性白内障眼中的结果:与对照组比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Jul;28(7):1141-52. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01425-6.
9
Comparison of sulcus implantation of single-piece hydrophilic foldable acrylic and polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses in eyes with posterior capsule tear during phacoemulsification surgery.白内障超声乳化手术中后囊膜破裂眼内单片式亲水性折叠丙烯酸酯和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯人工晶状体沟内植入的比较
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul-Aug;17(4):595-600. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700418.
10
Intraocular lenses for the treatment of age-related cataracts: an evidence-based analysis.用于治疗年龄相关性白内障的人工晶状体:一项循证分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(15):1-62. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on pediatric cataract surgery.小儿白内障手术的最新进展。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2025 Jul-Aug;14(4):100229. doi: 10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100229. Epub 2025 Aug 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-piece Foldable Intraocular Lenses versus Three-piece Intraocular Lenses in the Sulcus following Posterior Capsular Rupture in a Philippine Tertiary Hospital.菲律宾一家三级医院后囊破裂后沟内单片可折叠人工晶状体与三片式人工晶状体的比较
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Aug 30;58(15):67-73. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.7960. eCollection 2024.
2
Current Concepts of the Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphema (UGH) Syndrome.当前对葡萄膜炎-青光眼-前房积血(UGH)综合征的认识。
Curr Eye Res. 2023 Jun;48(6):529-535. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2156547. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
Outcomes of cataract surgery complicated by posterior capsule rupture in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery.
在欧洲白内障和屈光手术质量结果登记处,白内障手术后后囊破裂的结果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Aug 1;48(8):942-946. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000901.
4
Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery.白内障手术后预防后囊膜混浊的人工晶状体光学边缘设计。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD012516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012516.pub2.
5
[Fixation of an intraocular lens using reverse optic capture with haptic tuck for intraoperative posterior capsule rupture].术中后囊破裂时采用触觉折叠反向光学捕获法固定人工晶状体
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Sep;118(9):960-964. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01432-2. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
Cataract surgery practice patterns worldwide: a survey.全球白内障手术的实践模式:一项调查
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 13;6(1):e000464. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000464. eCollection 2021.
7
Posterior capsule opacification: What's in the bag?后囊膜混浊:袋里有什么?
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021 May;82:100905. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100905. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Intraocular Lens Complications: Decentration, Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphema Syndrome, Opacification, and Refractive Surprises.眼内晶状体并发症:偏位、葡萄膜炎-青光眼-前房积血综合征、混浊和屈光意外。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Nov;128(11):e186-e194. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
9
Intraocular Lenses: Overview of Designs, Materials, and Pathophysiologic Features.人工晶状体:设计、材料及病理生理特征概述
Ophthalmology. 2021 Nov;128(11):e74-e93. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.06.055. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
10
Intraocular Lens Implantation In The Ciliary Sulcus: Challenges And Risks.睫状沟内人工晶状体植入术:挑战与风险
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 27;13:2317-2323. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S205148. eCollection 2019.