Park Sung Eun, Lee Tae Yoon, Seo Chang Ho, Han Eui Soo, Hong Tae Ho
Department of Hepato-biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3314-3322. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002346.
Patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) often receive antibiotics to reduce the risk of infectious complications after cholecystectomy. This study investigated the clinical significance of antibiotic use in patients with mild-to-moderate AC who required emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
This multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at four centers between February 2023 and January 2024. Patients with AC eligible for emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to the antibiotic or placebo group. The antibiotic group received 1 g of intravenous cefazolin daily for three days during hospitalization and oral antibiotics for 4 days after discharge, whereas the placebo group received 10 mL of intravenous normal saline during their hospital stay. The primary endpoint was the rate of infectious complications.
An imputed per-protocol analysis of 370 patients (185 in each group) found comparable postoperative infection rates between the antibiotic group (7.6%, 14 patients) and placebo group (7%, 13 patients), showing no statistically significant difference ( P = 0.842). Overall, the non-infectious complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups: 21 (11.5%) cases in the antibiotic group vs. 30 (16.2%) cases in the placebo group ( P = 0.591). Considering a non-inferiority margin of 10%, the absence of antibiotic treatment did not result in worse clinical outcomes than the antibiotic treatment.
Administering antibiotics, even in sufficient doses, did not significantly reduce the risk of infectious complications in patients with AC compared to the group that did not receive antibiotics.
急性胆囊炎(AC)患者常接受抗生素治疗,以降低胆囊切除术后感染并发症的风险。本研究调查了在需要急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的轻至中度AC患者中使用抗生素的临床意义。
本多中心、双盲、随机对照试验于2023年2月至2024年1月在四个中心进行。符合急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术条件的AC患者被随机分配至抗生素组或安慰剂组。抗生素组在住院期间每天静脉注射1g头孢唑林,共三天,出院后口服抗生素4天,而安慰剂组在住院期间接受10mL静脉生理盐水。主要终点是感染并发症的发生率。
对370例患者(每组185例)进行的意向性分析发现,抗生素组(7.6%,14例患者)和安慰剂组(7%,13例患者)的术后感染率相当,无统计学显著差异(P = 0.842)。总体而言,两组的非感染并发症发生率无显著差异:抗生素组21例(11.5%),安慰剂组30例(16.2%)(P = 0.591)。考虑到10%的非劣效性界限,未使用抗生素治疗并未导致比使用抗生素治疗更差的临床结果。
与未接受抗生素治疗的组相比,即使给予足够剂量的抗生素,也不能显著降低AC患者感染并发症的风险。