• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子同意书提高患者理解度并解决引入过程中的问题,特别关注新冠疫情:日本制药商协会的问卷调查

Using eConsent to improve patient comprehension and solving issues for introduction, with special attention to the COVID-19 pandemic: A questionnaire survey by the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association.

作者信息

Tomotsugu Naoki, Sakuma Naoki, Dobashi Maki, Someya Miki, Imai Akiko, Sakoda Junichi, Fukuda Masashi, Yoshimoto Katsuhiko, Iiyama Tatsuo

机构信息

National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Teijin Pharma Limited, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

GHM Open. 2023 Aug 31;3(1):20-27. doi: 10.35772/ghmo.2023.01000.

DOI:10.35772/ghmo.2023.01000
PMID:40143834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11933932/
Abstract

The environment surrounding clinical trials is evolving rapidly with the advancement of digital transformation (DX). Especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, digital methods are effective in promoting multiregional clinical trials (MRCT). eConsent is an electronic tool for obtaining informed consent that is expected as a key solution to improve patient understanding. According to the report by Pietrzykowski ., patient understanding in clinical trials is surprisingly low, and this is a significant ethical problem. Despite the current situation, the use of eConsent has not significantly progressed at least in Japan. This study aimed to identify the current issues for eConsent and consider measures to solve them. In January 2022, an online questionnaire survey was sent to 69 member companies of the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA), and 52 companies (75.4%) responded. Thirteen companies (25.0%) conducted a trial using eConsent. Among the 13 companies, 17 trials were conducted by 8 companies during or after the COVID-19 pandemic (summer 2020), compared to 8 trials by 5 companies before the pandemic. We found that the biggest obstacles to the spread of eConsent are the lack of awareness of eConsent use and the development of provisions for treating electronic files as source records in medical institutions. In conclusion, we need to encourage medical institutions to update provisions for handling electronic source documents and to notify them of the importance of eConsent. Thus, further promotion of eConsent is needed to increase patient understanding and enable more efficient clinical trials.

摘要

随着数字转型(DX)的推进,围绕临床试验的环境正在迅速演变。特别是在新冠疫情期间,数字方法在促进多区域临床试验(MRCT)方面很有效。电子知情同意书是一种用于获取知情同意的电子工具,有望成为提高患者理解度的关键解决方案。根据彼得日科夫斯基等人的报告,临床试验中患者的理解度出奇地低,这是一个重大的伦理问题。尽管如此,至少在日本,电子知情同意书的使用并没有取得显著进展。本研究旨在确定电子知情同意书目前存在的问题,并考虑解决这些问题的措施。2022年1月,向日本制药商协会(JPMA)的69家成员公司发送了在线问卷调查,52家公司(75.4%)做出了回应。13家公司(25.0%)使用电子知情同意书进行了试验。在这13家公司中,8家公司在新冠疫情期间(2020年夏季)或之后进行了17项试验,而在疫情之前,5家公司进行了8项试验。我们发现,电子知情同意书推广的最大障碍是对其使用缺乏认识,以及医疗机构将电子文件作为源记录处理的规定的制定。总之,我们需要鼓励医疗机构更新处理电子源文件的规定,并告知他们电子知情同意书的重要性。因此,需要进一步推广电子知情同意书,以提高患者的理解度,并实现更高效的临床试验。

相似文献

1
Using eConsent to improve patient comprehension and solving issues for introduction, with special attention to the COVID-19 pandemic: A questionnaire survey by the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association.利用电子同意书提高患者理解度并解决引入过程中的问题,特别关注新冠疫情:日本制药商协会的问卷调查
GHM Open. 2023 Aug 31;3(1):20-27. doi: 10.35772/ghmo.2023.01000.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.电子知情同意的比较效果:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 1;25:e43883. doi: 10.2196/43883.
3
Approaches and experiences implementing remote, electronic consent at the Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit.在利兹临床试验研究单位实施远程电子同意的方法和经验。
Trials. 2024 May 8;25(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08149-y.
4
Differences in eConsent among diagnosis groups.各诊断组之间电子同意书的差异。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Aug 21;35:101200. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101200. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Evaluation of a group-based online informed consent conversation (eConsent) in participants from a low-risk vaccination clinical trial.评价一项基于群组的在线知情同意对话(eConsent)在低风险疫苗临床试验参与者中的应用。
Trials. 2024 Aug 7;25(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08367-4.
6
Electronic Informed Consent in MOST: An Acute Ischemic Stroke Clinical Trial.急性缺血性中风临床试验中大多数情况下的电子知情同意书。
Stroke. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049369.
7
The Use of Electronic Consent (eConsent) Within the Ketamine for Long-Lasting Pain Relief After Surgery (KALPAS) Multicenter Trial.氯胺酮用于术后长期疼痛缓解(KALPAS)多中心试验中的电子同意书(eConsent)应用
J Pain Res. 2025 Feb 5;18:589-595. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S488917. eCollection 2025.
8
Electronic Surgical Consent Delivery Via Patient Portal to Improve Perioperative Efficiency.电子手术同意书通过患者门户传递以提高围手术期效率。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1300-1306. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3581.
9
Evaluation of a REDCap-based Workflow for Supporting Federal Guidance for Electronic Informed Consent.基于REDCap的工作流程评估,以支持联邦电子知情同意指南
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019 May 6;2019:163-172. eCollection 2019.
10
Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study.应用程序介导的帕金森病mPower研究中参与者对移动电子同意书体验的形成性评估:一项混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Feb 16;5(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6521.

本文引用的文献

1
Remote decentralized clinical trials: a new opportunity for laboratory medicine.远程去中心化临床试验:检验医学的新机遇。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jan 5;61(8):1388-1394. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1184. Print 2023 Jul 26.
2
The reality of informed consent: empirical studies on patient comprehension-systematic review.知情同意的现实:患者理解的实证研究-系统评价。
Trials. 2021 Jan 14;22(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04969-w.
3
Digitizing clinical trials.临床试验数字化。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jul 31;3:101. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0302-y. eCollection 2020.
4
Awareness and Collaboration Across Stakeholder Groups Important for eConsent Achieving Value-Driven Adoption.各利益相关者群体之间的意识与协作对于电子同意书实现价值驱动型采用至关重要。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Nov;53(6):724-735. doi: 10.1177/2168479019861924. Epub 2019 Jul 18.