• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

各利益相关者群体之间的意识与协作对于电子同意书实现价值驱动型采用至关重要。

Awareness and Collaboration Across Stakeholder Groups Important for eConsent Achieving Value-Driven Adoption.

作者信息

Vanaken Hilde, Masand Shirley N

机构信息

Janssen Clinical Innovation, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.

Accenture Life Sciences, Berwyn, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Nov;53(6):724-735. doi: 10.1177/2168479019861924. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1177/2168479019861924
PMID:31319717
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the shift to digital technologies is pervasive across multiple industries, the informed consent process for clinical trials remains largely paper-based. Given the inefficiencies in the traditional process and the increasing complexity of clinical studies, the current approach at times may raise challenges with respect to quality, compliance, participant understanding, and trial retention. Electronic informed consent (eConsent) is an enabling clinical technology to potentially address these issues by using multimedia components to create an interactive participant experience and improve data quality.

METHODS

The TransCelerate eConsent Initiative conducted a multifaceted engagement approach to better understand the perceptions, experiences, and concerns of impacted stakeholders, including participants, sites, ethics committees, and health authorities.

RESULTS

While all stakeholders were supportive of the use of multimedia components to deliver study information, several stakeholder-specific concerns were noted. Participant feedback, as collected through surveys (n = 3045) and an advisory board (n = 10), suggests that some participants may have data privacy concerns and a diversity of preferences for multimedia presentation. Site interviews (n = 9) suggest concerns related to additional operational activities and potential for technology failure. Health authorities' feedback, through nonbinding meetings, was geographically varied; ethics committee feedback, through interviews, suggests concern over impact on operational process changes.

CONCLUSIONS

While the appetite for eConsent is increasing, involved stakeholders and industry must continue to raise awareness, communicate, and collaborate to develop appropriate technological capabilities, regulatory pathways, and operational processes to clear the path for mainstream use of eConsent.

摘要

背景

虽然向数字技术的转变在多个行业中普遍存在,但临床试验的知情同意过程在很大程度上仍基于纸质。鉴于传统过程的低效以及临床研究日益复杂,当前方法有时可能在质量、合规性、参与者理解和试验保留方面带来挑战。电子知情同意(eConsent)是一种临床技术,通过使用多媒体组件来创造交互式参与者体验并提高数据质量,有可能解决这些问题。

方法

跨加速电子知情同意倡议采取了多方面的参与方式,以更好地了解受影响的利益相关者(包括参与者、研究点、伦理委员会和卫生当局)的看法、经验和担忧。

结果

虽然所有利益相关者都支持使用多媒体组件来提供研究信息,但也注意到了一些特定于利益相关者的担忧。通过调查(n = 3045)和咨询委员会(n = 10)收集的参与者反馈表明,一些参与者可能存在数据隐私担忧以及对多媒体呈现的多种偏好。研究点访谈(n = 9)表明存在与额外操作活动和技术故障可能性相关的担忧。通过非约束性会议获得的卫生当局反馈在地域上存在差异;通过访谈获得的伦理委员会反馈表明担心对操作流程变化的影响。

结论

虽然对电子知情同意的兴趣在增加,但相关利益相关者和行业必须继续提高认识、进行沟通和开展合作,以开发适当的技术能力、监管途径和操作流程,为电子知情同意的主流应用扫清道路。

相似文献

1
Awareness and Collaboration Across Stakeholder Groups Important for eConsent Achieving Value-Driven Adoption.各利益相关者群体之间的意识与协作对于电子同意书实现价值驱动型采用至关重要。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Nov;53(6):724-735. doi: 10.1177/2168479019861924. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.电子知情同意的比较效果:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 1;25:e43883. doi: 10.2196/43883.
3
Approaches and experiences implementing remote, electronic consent at the Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit.在利兹临床试验研究单位实施远程电子同意的方法和经验。
Trials. 2024 May 8;25(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08149-y.
4
Evaluation of a group-based online informed consent conversation (eConsent) in participants from a low-risk vaccination clinical trial.评价一项基于群组的在线知情同意对话(eConsent)在低风险疫苗临床试验参与者中的应用。
Trials. 2024 Aug 7;25(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08367-4.
5
Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study.应用程序介导的帕金森病mPower研究中参与者对移动电子同意书体验的形成性评估:一项混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Feb 16;5(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6521.
6
Protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation clinical trial evaluating video-assisted electronic consent vs standard consent for patients initiating and continuing haemodialysis in Australia (eConsent HD).评估澳大利亚开始和继续血液透析患者的视频辅助电子知情同意与标准知情同意的混合有效性-实施临床试验方案(eConsent HD)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):e081181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081181.
7
Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review.电子知情同意在生物医学研究中的实施及利益相关者的观点:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):e19129. doi: 10.2196/19129.
8
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
9
Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review.电子知情同意书在研究伦理审查中的标准:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 21;23(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00849-x.
10
A REDCap-based model for electronic consent (eConsent): Moving toward a more personalized consent.一种基于REDCap的电子同意书(eConsent)模型:迈向更个性化的同意书。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Apr 3;4(4):345-353. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.30.

引用本文的文献

1
Using eConsent to improve patient comprehension and solving issues for introduction, with special attention to the COVID-19 pandemic: A questionnaire survey by the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association.利用电子同意书提高患者理解度并解决引入过程中的问题,特别关注新冠疫情:日本制药商协会的问卷调查
GHM Open. 2023 Aug 31;3(1):20-27. doi: 10.35772/ghmo.2023.01000.
2
Digital technologies used in clinical trial recruitment and enrollment including application to trial diversity and inclusion: A systematic review.用于临床试验招募和入组的数字技术,包括在试验多样性和包容性方面的应用:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Mar 28;10:20552076241242390. doi: 10.1177/20552076241242390. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Differences in eConsent among diagnosis groups.
各诊断组之间电子同意书的差异。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Aug 21;35:101200. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101200. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.电子知情同意的比较效果:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 1;25:e43883. doi: 10.2196/43883.
5
An e-consent framework for tiered informed consent for human genomic research in the global south, implemented as a REDCap template.一个用于全球南方人类基因组研究分层知情同意的电子知情同意框架,作为 REDCap 模板实施。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 24;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00860-2.
6
Digitizing the Informed Consent Process: A Review of the Regulatory Landscape in the European Union.数字化知情同意流程:欧盟监管环境综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 25;9:906448. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.906448. eCollection 2022.
7
Participant comprehension and perspectives regarding the convenience, security, and satisfaction with teleconsent compared to in-person consent: A parallel-group pilot study among Danish citizens.与亲自同意相比,参与者对远程同意的便利性、安全性和满意度的理解及看法:丹麦公民中的一项平行组试点研究。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 May 27;28:100927. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100927. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
METORY: Development of a Demand-Driven Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent Platform Tailored for Clinical Trials.METORY:为临床试验量身定制的基于需求驱动的区块链动态同意平台的开发。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 13;9:837197. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.837197. eCollection 2022.
9
Evaluation of a blockchain-based dynamic consent platform (METORY) in a decentralized and multicenter clinical trial using virtual drugs.使用虚拟药物对基于区块链的动态同意平台 (METORY) 在去中心化和多中心临床试验中的评估。
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 May;15(5):1257-1268. doi: 10.1111/cts.13246. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
10
Key components and IT assistance of participant management in clinical research: a scoping review.临床研究中参与者管理的关键组成部分与信息技术辅助:一项范围综述
JAMIA Open. 2020 Oct 14;3(3):449-458. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa041. eCollection 2020 Oct.