Iffland Judith A, Thomas Jana
Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Private Practice, Rostock, Germany.
Sex Offending. 2024 Oct 8;19:e13087. doi: 10.5964/sotrap.13087. eCollection 2024.
Previous research about intrafamilial child sexual abuse was not able to identify specific risk factors that distinguish this unique subgroup from other sexual offending subgroups. In comparison to other groups of sexual offenders, men convicted of intrafamilial sexual child abuse (ICSA) are found to exhibit more similarities to non-offending fathers than extrafamilial sexual offenders. Consequently, the risk assessment of sexual recidivism among "incest offenders" lacks evidence-based evaluation criteria. Given the suggestion that family system factors should be included in research on the onset of ICSA, we employed the proposed by Trepper and Barrett (1989, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203776605) in a qualitative single-case analysis. A comparative analysis of ten court evaluations of ICSA offenders revealed that all families in which ICSA has occurred demonstrated at least two vulnerability factors. The analyzed offenders exhibited comparable patterns of masculine sexual entitlement. The utility of this recently developed construct for sexual violence research is discussed and implications for further research proposed.
先前关于家庭内部儿童性虐待的研究未能确定将这一独特亚组与其他性犯罪亚组区分开来的具体风险因素。与其他性犯罪者群体相比，被判定犯有家庭内部儿童性虐待（ICSA）罪的男性与非犯罪父亲的相似之处多于家庭外性犯罪者。因此，“乱伦犯罪者”中性再犯的风险评估缺乏循证评估标准。鉴于有人建议在ICSA发病研究中应纳入家庭系统因素，我们在定性单案例分析中采用了Trepper和Barrett（1989年，https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203776605）提出的方法。对十起ICSA犯罪者的法庭评估进行的比较分析表明，所有发生ICSA的家庭都至少表现出两个脆弱因素。经分析的犯罪者表现出类似的男性性权利模式。讨论了这一最近开发的结构在性暴力研究中的效用，并提出了对进一步研究的启示。
