• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈癌淋巴血管间隙浸润的列线图预测:2009年与2018年分期系统的比较

Nomogram prediction of the lymph-vascular space invasion in cervical cancer: comparison of 2009 and 2018 staging systems.

作者信息

Li Suyu, Chen Yusha, Huang Xizhen, Chen Xiaoying, Li Xiaoyang, Zhou Guangrun, Huang Liyuan, Huang Qiuyuan, Chen Lingsi, Xie Zhonghang, Zheng Xiangqin

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Cervical Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Health Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 6;15:1505512. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1505512. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1505512
PMID:40144207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11937894/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) is a crucial prognostic factor in cervical cancer (CC), and its assessment is essential for developing personalized treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to focused on constructing LVSI predictive model based on clinical indicators and evaluating its predictive performance across different FIGO staging cohorts.

STUDY DESIGN

We included 691 patients, with 348 patients having 2009 FIGO stage IB1-IIA2 CC assigned to Cohort 1, and 343 patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB1-IIIC1r CC assigned to Cohort 2. In Cohort 1, univariable and multivariable regression analyses, along with Mallows' Cp, R squared-R, and LASSO, were used to select variables forming Model 1. Model 2 included the FIGO stage. We compared the contribution of different FIGO stages to the LVSI prediction model in both cohorts. The final LVSI prediction model for the entire cohort was constructed using selected variables and risk stratification was established. The models were evaluated through internal validations using ROC curves, C-index, Clinical Impact Curve (CIC), and Decision Curve.

RESULTS

Five variables were incorporated into Model 1: age, Pathology, Depth of Stromal Invasion (DSI), SCC-Ag, and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH). Model 2 was established by incorporating the FIGO staging system. Compared with the two models, there was no significant difference in ROC, ΔC-index and ΔNRI. Adding FIGO clinical staging did not significantly improve predictive value. Model 1's variable were included in the nomogram for the combined cohort. The AUC for the model-development cohort and validation cohort was 0.754 (95% CI: 0.711, 0.798) and 0.789 (95% CI: 0.727, 0.852), respectively. In both cohorts, risk stratification effectively distinguished the high-risk group, which had a significantly higher proportion of positive cases compared to the low and middle-risk groups (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our nomogram predictive model demonstrates robust LVSI prediction performance across different staging systems.

摘要

背景

淋巴管间隙浸润(LVSI)是宫颈癌(CC)的一个关键预后因素,对其进行评估对于制定个性化治疗策略至关重要。

目的

本研究的主要目的是基于临床指标构建LVSI预测模型,并评估其在不同国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期队列中的预测性能。

研究设计

我们纳入了691例患者,其中348例2009年FIGO分期为IB1-IIA2期的CC患者被分配到队列1,343例2018年FIGO分期为IB1-IIIC1r期的CC患者被分配到队列2。在队列1中,采用单变量和多变量回归分析,以及马洛斯Cp、决定系数R和套索回归来选择构成模型1的变量。模型2纳入了FIGO分期。我们比较了不同FIGO分期对两个队列中LVSI预测模型的贡献。使用选定变量构建了整个队列的最终LVSI预测模型,并建立了风险分层。通过使用ROC曲线、C指数、临床影响曲线(CIC)和决策曲线进行内部验证来评估模型。

结果

五个变量被纳入模型1:年龄、病理类型、间质浸润深度(DSI)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)。通过纳入FIGO分期系统建立了模型2。与这两个模型相比,ROC、ΔC指数和Δ净重新分类指数(NRI)没有显著差异。添加FIGO临床分期并没有显著提高预测价值。模型1的变量被纳入了联合队列的列线图中。模型开发队列和验证队列的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.754(95%置信区间:0.711,0.798)和0.789(95%置信区间:0.727,0.852)。在两个队列中,风险分层有效地区分了高危组,与低危和中危组相比,高危组的阳性病例比例显著更高(p<0.01)。

结论

我们的列线图预测模型在不同分期系统中均表现出强大的LVSI预测性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/8abc57f21b8f/fonc-15-1505512-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/74ae25240197/fonc-15-1505512-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/16f8fa48cc19/fonc-15-1505512-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/9b0f83f5f058/fonc-15-1505512-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/75f164cb1a16/fonc-15-1505512-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/8abc57f21b8f/fonc-15-1505512-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/74ae25240197/fonc-15-1505512-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/16f8fa48cc19/fonc-15-1505512-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/9b0f83f5f058/fonc-15-1505512-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/75f164cb1a16/fonc-15-1505512-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cbf/11937894/8abc57f21b8f/fonc-15-1505512-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Nomogram prediction of the lymph-vascular space invasion in cervical cancer: comparison of 2009 and 2018 staging systems.宫颈癌淋巴血管间隙浸润的列线图预测:2009年与2018年分期系统的比较
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 6;15:1505512. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1505512. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study.2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IB1、IB2和IIA1期宫颈癌预后列线图的开发与验证:一项大型多中心研究
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jan;10(2):121. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6367.
3
Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.淋巴结阴性Ⅰ期-ⅡA 期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术后无病生存预测的术后列线图。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;40(5):699-704. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1652888. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
4
Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.2018 年 FIGO 分期系统对宫颈癌的预后价值。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jun;165(3):506-513. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
MR-Based Radiomics Nomogram of Cervical Cancer in Prediction of the Lymph-Vascular Space Invasion preoperatively.基于 MRI 的宫颈癌放射组学列线图术前预测淋巴结脉管间隙侵犯
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 May;49(5):1420-1426. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26531. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
6
Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy plus or Not Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 2018 FIGO Staging.基于 2018 年 FIGO 分期的同步放化疗加或不加辅助化疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的生存预测列线图:一项回顾性分析。
Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2024 Nov;39(9):690-705. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2023.0199. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
7
Multiparametric MRI radiomics nomogram for predicting lymph-vascular space invasion in early-stage cervical cancer.多参数 MRI 放射组学列线图预测早期宫颈癌的淋巴管血管间隙侵犯。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Jun 1;95(1134):20211076. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211076. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
8
Based on 3D-PDU and clinical characteristics nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastasis and lymph-vascular space invasion of early cervical cancer preoperatively.基于 3D-PDU 和临床特征列线图预测早期宫颈癌术前淋巴结转移和淋巴管脉管间隙侵犯。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03281-y.
9
A nomogram of preoperative indicators predicting lymph vascular space invasion in cervical cancer.预测宫颈癌淋巴血管间隙浸润的术前指标列线图。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2079-2087. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07385-6. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
10
Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage.2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)宫颈癌分类的验证:IB1期应考虑脉管间隙浸润
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 28;12(12):3554. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123554.

本文引用的文献

1
Management for Cervical Cancer Patients: A Comparison of the Guidelines from the International Scientific Societies (ESGO-NCCN-ASCO-AIOM-FIGO-BGCS-SEOM-ESMO-JSGO).宫颈癌患者的管理:国际科学学会(ESGO-NCCN-ASCO-AIOM-FIGO-BGCS-SEOM-ESMO-JSGO)指南比较
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 15;16(14):2541. doi: 10.3390/cancers16142541.
2
A nomogram of preoperative indicators predicting lymph vascular space invasion in cervical cancer.预测宫颈癌淋巴血管间隙浸润的术前指标列线图。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2079-2087. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07385-6. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
Cancer statistics, 2024.
2024年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Association between serum lactate dehydrogenase and lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer.血清乳酸脱氢酶与宫颈癌淋巴结转移之间的关联
Oncol Lett. 2023 Sep 25;26(5):482. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14069. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
A preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in early cervical squamous cell cancer with hematologica - based model.基于血液学模型对早期宫颈鳞状细胞癌淋巴结转移的术前预测
J Cancer. 2023 Jun 19;14(10):1763-1772. doi: 10.7150/jca.85301. eCollection 2023.
6
NF-κB mediated regulation of tumor cell proliferation in hypoxic microenvironment.缺氧微环境中NF-κB介导的肿瘤细胞增殖调控
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 20;14:1108915. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1108915. eCollection 2023.
7
The Oncological Implication of Sentinel Lymph Node in Early Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Oncological Outcomes and Type of Recurrences.前哨淋巴结在早期宫颈癌中的肿瘤学意义:肿瘤学结局和复发类型的荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 27;58(11):1539. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111539.
8
Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer ≥ 2 cm: A Problem with a Thousand Nuances-A Systematic Review of Oncological Outcomes.保留生育功能治疗≥2cm 早期宫颈癌:一个存在千般细微差别的问题——肿瘤学结局的系统评价。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8346-8358. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12436-w. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
9
Risk Factor Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer.国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IB1期宫颈癌患者淋巴结转移的危险因素评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 30;12:809159. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.809159. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparison of survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy.根治性放化疗后宫颈癌鳞癌与腺癌/腺鳞癌生存结局的比较。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 25;22(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09401-x.