• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺移植治疗肺纤维化:移植侧别重要吗?

Single lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis: Does side matter?

作者信息

Langer Frank, Starniske Ina, Weingard Bettina, Aliyev Parviz, Mustafi Migdat, Bals Robert, Wilkens Heinrike

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine V, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

JHLT Open. 2025 Feb 14;8:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100229. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100229
PMID:40144718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11935513/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The implementation of the Lung Allocation Score in the Eurotransplant international collaborative framework decreased waiting list mortality, but organ shortage remains a significant problem. Single lung transplantation (sLTx)-whenever possible-may decrease waiting list mortality. We have consistently employed sLTx for recipients with pulmonary fibrosis. In the current investigation, we sought to analyze if this strategy can lead to an acceptable long-term outcome and if the side of sLTx has an impact on the outcome.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2024, we performed 138 sLTx for patients with pulmonary fibrosis (54 ± 9 years, 88 male). Data and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively comparing recipients receiving left sLTX ( = 98) and right sLTx ( = 40).

RESULTS

Survival was 83%, 59%, and 29% at 1, 5, and 10 years for the total patient cohort. Survival was similar for left and right sLTx (83 vs 81%, 58 vs 64%, and 29 vs 28% at 1, 5, and 10 years,  = 0.54). Left and right transplantations lead to similar best post-transplant forced expiratory volume per second (74% ± 20% vs 74% ± 21%,  = 0.86). While the total lung capacity (TLC) ratio TLC/predicted TLC was similar between groups (104% vs 100%), the ratio TLC/actual TLC was higher in left sLTx (185% vs 158%,  = 0.04). On multivariate regression analysis, postoperative pneumonia ( = 0.003, hazard ratio 3.404) and sepsis ( = 0.002, hazard ratio 10.700) were identified as predictors for early mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing sLTx for pulmonary fibrosis patients can be an effective strategy to optimize donor utilization and improve outcomes-irrespective of graft side.

摘要

背景

在欧洲移植国际协作框架内实施肺分配评分降低了等待名单上的死亡率,但器官短缺仍然是一个重大问题。单肺移植(sLTx)——只要有可能——可能会降低等待名单上的死亡率。我们一直对肺纤维化患者采用sLTx。在当前的研究中,我们试图分析这种策略是否能带来可接受的长期结果,以及sLTx的植入侧是否会对结果产生影响。

方法

1995年至2024年期间,我们对138例肺纤维化患者进行了sLTx(年龄54±9岁,男性88例)。对接受左肺sLTX(n = 98)和右肺sLTx(n = 40)的受者的数据和结果进行回顾性分析比较。

结果

整个患者队列在1年、5年和10年时的生存率分别为83%、59%和29%。左肺和右肺sLTx的生存率相似(1年、5年和10年时分别为83%对81%、58%对64%和29%对28%,P = 0.54)。左肺和右肺移植术后的最佳一秒用力呼气量相似(74%±20%对74%±21%,P = 0.86)。虽然两组之间的肺总量(TLC)与预测TLC的比值相似(104%对100%),但左肺sLTx的TLC/实际TLC比值更高(185%对158%,P = 0.04)。多因素回归分析显示,术后肺炎(P = 0.003,风险比3.404)和败血症(P = 0.002,风险比10.700)是早期死亡的预测因素。

结论

对肺纤维化患者进行sLTx可以是优化供体利用和改善结果的有效策略——无论移植侧如何。

相似文献

1
Single lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis: Does side matter?肺移植治疗肺纤维化:移植侧别重要吗?
JHLT Open. 2025 Feb 14;8:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100229. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Single-lung transplantation: does side matter?单肺移植:肺叶的位置重要吗?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(2):e83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
3
Outcomes of single vs double lung retransplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者单肺与双肺再次移植的结果
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Feb;44(2):184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.010. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
4
Single Versus Bilateral Lung Transplantation for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in the Lung Allocation Score Era.肺分配评分时代特发性肺纤维化的单肺与双肺移植比较。
J Surg Res. 2019 Feb;234:84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.054. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
Two single lung transplantations from one donor: lung twinning in the LAS era.一例供体双肺移植:LAS 时代的肺分体。
Respir Res. 2024 Mar 18;25(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02754-w.
6
Characterization of Baseline Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Single Lung Transplant Recipients.单肺移植受者基线期肺移植功能障碍的特征分析
Transplantation. 2025 Apr 1;109(4):e213-e221. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005189. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
7
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Outcomes after Single or Double Lung Transplantation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Interstitial Lung Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病或间质性肺疾病患者单肺或双肺移植后的肺康复结局。
Respiration. 2017;94(2):178-185. doi: 10.1159/000477351. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
8
Native-lung complications following single-lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease: an in-depth analysis.间质性肺疾病单肺移植术后的原生肺并发症:深入分析
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03009-6.
9
Continued Utility of Single-Lung Transplantation in Select Populations: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.单肺移植在特定人群中的持续效用:慢性阻塞性肺疾病
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;100(2):437-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
A simplified strategy for donor-recipient size-matching in lung transplant for interstitial lung disease.肺移植治疗间质性肺疾病中供受者体型匹配的简化策略。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Nov;40(11):1422-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Two single lung transplantations from one donor: lung twinning in the LAS era.一例供体双肺移植:LAS 时代的肺分体。
Respir Res. 2024 Mar 18;25(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02754-w.
2
Evaluating the Use of CT-Derived Lung Volumes in Donor-Recipient Lung Size Matching for Lung Transplantation in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease and/or Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.评估CT衍生肺容积在间质性肺疾病和/或特发性肺纤维化患者肺移植供受者肺大小匹配中的应用。
Transplant Proc. 2023 Apr;55(3):623-628. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.02.059. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
3
Factors associated with short- versus long-term survival after lung transplant.
肺移植术后短期与长期生存相关因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Mar;163(3):853-860.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.09.097. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
4
Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.特发性肺纤维化的单肺与双肺移植:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233732. eCollection 2020.
5
Single and Double Lung Transplantation Have Equivalent Survival for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.特发性肺纤维化行单肺移植和双肺移植的存活率相当。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jan;109(1):211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.090. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Which Shall I Choose? Lung Transplantation Listing Preference for Individuals with Interstitial Lung Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.我该如何选择?间质性肺疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺移植登记偏好
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Feb;16(2):193-195. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-633ED.
7
Normothermic ex-vivo preservation with the portable Organ Care System Lung device for bilateral lung transplantation (INSPIRE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 study.采用便携式 Organ Care System Lung 装置常温离体肺保存进行双侧肺移植(INSPIRE):一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性、3 期研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 May;6(5):357-367. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30136-X. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
8
Lung Transplantation in Germany Since the Introduction of the Lung Allocation Score.德国自引入肺分配评分系统以来的肺移植情况。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Mar 17;114(11):179-185. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0179.
9
Post-transplant survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients concurrently listed for single and double lung transplantation.同时被列入单肺移植和双肺移植名单的特发性肺纤维化患者的移植后生存率。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 May;35(5):657-60. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.12.030. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
10
Single- vs double-lung transplantation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis since the implementation of lung allocation based on medical need.在根据医疗需求进行肺分配实施后,慢性阻塞性肺疾病和特发性肺纤维化患者的单肺与双肺移植比较。
JAMA. 2015 Mar 3;313(9):936-48. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1175.