Suppr超能文献

不同双侧电极起搏向量配置下电生理左束支起搏特征的比较

Comparison of electrophysiological left bundle branch pacing characteristics in different bilateral electrode pacing vector configurations.

作者信息

Wu Hao, Jiang Longfu, Shen Jiabo, Zhang Lu

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Medical Research Center of Ningbo, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 12;12:1500196. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1500196. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) in bipolar pacing with anodal capture produces a more balanced ventricular activation than conventional unipolar pacing but need high pacing output. The present study aimed to compare the electrophysiological characteristics of LBBP in different bilateral electrode pacing vector configurations.

METHODS

A total of 57 patients who met the criteria for left bundle branch (LBB) capture and underwent three bilateral electrode pacing vector configuration test were enrolled. The electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrogram (EGM) parameters were evaluated and other electrophysiological characteristics were analyzed using a three-electrode configuration test.

RESULTS

Seven capture modes [right ventricular septal (RVS) + left ventricular septal (LVS) + LBB, RVS + LBB, LVS + LBB, RVS + LVS, RVS, LVS, and LBB] were utilized in the study. The thresholds of full fusion mode (RVS + LVS + LB) in Bilateral Cathodes and Ring Bipolar were all lower than that in Tip Bipolar (1.2 ± 0.5 V vs. 2.7 ± 1.0 V,  < 0.001; 1.6 ± 0.6 V vs. 2.7 ± 1.0 V,  < 0.001). Full fusion mode had the shortest P-QRS (116.9 ± 12.8 ms) and V1 RWPT (94.5 ± 12.3 ms), V6 RWPT remain the shortest (64.9 ± 9.7 ms).

CONCLUSION

Changing the bilateral electrode pacing vector configuration to Bilateral Cathodes and Ring Bipolar can reduce the full fusion mode capture threshold compared to conventional bipolar pacing.

摘要

引言

双极起搏中采用阳极夺获的左束支起搏(LBBP)比传统单极起搏能产生更均衡的心室激动,但需要较高的起搏输出。本研究旨在比较不同双侧电极起搏向量配置下LBBP的电生理特征。

方法

共纳入57例符合左束支(LBB)夺获标准并接受三种双侧电极起搏向量配置测试的患者。评估心电图(ECG)和心内电图(EGM)参数,并使用三电极配置测试分析其他电生理特征。

结果

本研究采用了七种夺获模式[右心室间隔(RVS)+左心室间隔(LVS)+LBB、RVS+LBB、LVS+LBB、RVS+LVS、RVS、LVS和LBB]。双侧阴极和环双极起搏中完全融合模式(RVS+LVS+LB)的阈值均低于尖端双极起搏(1.2±0.5V对2.7±1.0V,<0.001;1.6±0.6V对2.7±1.0V,<0.001)。完全融合模式的P-QRS最短(116.9±12.8ms),V1区右心室激动时间(RWPT)最短(94.5±12.3ms),V6区RWPT仍最短(64.9±9.7ms)。

结论

与传统双极起搏相比,将双侧电极起搏向量配置改为双侧阴极和环双极起搏可降低完全融合模式的夺获阈值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f49f/11936911/21b3fbb72c0d/fcvm-12-1500196-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验