Suppr超能文献

在全球跨专业医疗教育学生合作中通过同伴评估评估团队动态:一项涵盖33所大学的纵向研究。

Evaluating group dynamics through peer assessment during a global student collaboration of interprofessional healthcare education: A longitudinal study across 33 universities.

作者信息

Sagoo Mandeep Gill, Lam Pak Yin, Sharma Tanvi, Arora Arisma, Siddiqui Maheen, Adeniyi Adedeji M, Brassett Cecilia, Noel Geoffroy, Wingate Richard, McWatt Sean, Stearns Dana, Garcia Souto Pilar, Wu Anette

机构信息

Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Anat Sci Educ. 2025 May;18(5):436-447. doi: 10.1002/ase.70026. Epub 2025 Mar 27.

Abstract

With the advent of healthcare globalization, interprofessional collaboration has become increasingly important on an international scale. This longitudinal study evaluated group dynamics in the International Collaboration and Exchange Program, a global online program of students across 33 universities from diverse healthcare backgrounds, including medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, and biomedical science. In groups of 4 to 6, participants engaged in regular discussions and projects relating to anatomy education and global health. Peer assessment was used to determine (1) whether a relationship existed between group cohesiveness and disparities in individual contribution levels and (2) whether group cohesiveness and individual contribution levels changed over time across varying group sizes. Two student cohorts were studied using the Individual Peer Assessment of Contribution methodology. Peer assessment surveys were distributed at two time points for the first (2021-2022) and second (2022-2023) cohorts, respectively, yielding 423 responses from 126 groups. Collaboration quality and effectiveness were evaluated through numerical ratings and qualitative feedback. Peer assessment is a viable tool for evaluating the dynamics of group interactions in virtual collaboration on a global scale. A reduction in group cohesiveness was associated with greater imbalances in individual contribution levels (r = -0.71, p < 0.001). Furthermore, larger groups (n = 6 students) demonstrated improved cohesiveness and equality in individual contribution levels over time compared to smaller groups (n = 4 students). This study on international healthcare student collaboration provides insights into sociocultural and educational factors impacting virtual group interactions and offers strategies for enhancing interprofessional collaborative practices in global health education.

摘要

随着医疗全球化的到来,跨专业协作在国际层面上变得越来越重要。这项纵向研究评估了国际协作与交流项目中的团队动态,该项目是一个全球性的在线项目,参与学生来自33所大学,涵盖医学、牙医学、药学和生物医学等不同医疗背景。参与者以4至6人为一组,定期开展与解剖学教育和全球健康相关的讨论和项目。通过同伴评估来确定:(1)团队凝聚力与个人贡献水平差异之间是否存在关系;(2)在不同团队规模下,团队凝聚力和个人贡献水平是否随时间变化。使用个人贡献的同伴评估方法对两个学生群体进行了研究。分别在两个时间点对第一组(2021 - 2022年)和第二组(2022 - 2023年)的学生发放了同伴评估调查问卷,共收到来自126个小组的423份回复。通过数值评分和定性反馈对协作质量和效果进行了评估。同伴评估是评估全球范围内虚拟协作中团队互动动态的一种可行工具。团队凝聚力的降低与个人贡献水平的更大失衡相关(r = -0.71,p < 0.001)。此外,随着时间推移,与较小的团队(4名学生)相比,较大的团队(6名学生)在个人贡献水平上表现出更高的凝聚力和平等性。这项关于国际医疗专业学生协作的研究深入探讨了影响虚拟团队互动的社会文化和教育因素,并为加强全球健康教育中的跨专业协作实践提供了策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a86/12051087/a9db21632642/ASE-18-436-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验