Freischlag J A, Ajalat G, Busuttil R W
Am J Surg. 1985 Jun;149(6):751-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(85)80180-x.
Necrotizing soft tissue infections are classified by the type of infecting organism, the presenting clinical picture, and the treatment required. However, reliance on this schema is impractical since it often leads to an inordinate delay in appropriate surgical therapy with an unwarranted loss of a limb or life. Since 1958, 21 patients were treated at the UCLA Medical Center with necrotizing soft tissue infections. Unifocal ulcerations and nonspreading infections were excluded. Of the 21 patients, the initial classification of the infections included necrotizing fasciitis in 38 percent, clostridial gangrene in 38 percent, bacterial synergistic gangrene in 19 percent, and streptococcal hemolytic gangrene in 5 percent. Diabetes or evidence of immunosuppression was found in 71 percent of the patients. The course could be traced to either a perforated viscus in 43 percent or a traumatic injury in 43 percent. No single clinical sign, including tissue gas, was diagnostic for a specific type of necrotizing soft tissue infection. Culture revealed a polymicrobial flora in 76 percent. Overall mortality was 52 percent and the amputation rate was 36 percent. Mean time to appropriate surgical therapy was 1.9 days. Operations performed more than 24 hours after recognition of infection resulted in a 70 percent mortality versus a 36 percent mortality when operations were performed less than 24 hours after recognition. A lesser operation to conserve tissue resulted in a 71 percent mortality versus a 43 percent mortality with initial radical surgery which encompassed all devitalized tissue. Based on these data, we conclude that classification of necrotizing soft tissue infections should be simplified to clostridial and nonclostridial infections. Radical operative debridement, regardless of tissue loss, should be carried out immediately after fluid resuscitation, and antibiotic coverage must be broad spectrum from the time of onset due to the polymicrobial nature of these infections.
坏死性软组织感染根据感染病原体类型、临床表现及所需治疗方法进行分类。然而,依赖这种分类方法并不实际,因为它常常导致在进行适当的外科治疗时出现过度延误,从而导致肢体或生命的无端丧失。自1958年以来,加州大学洛杉矶分校医疗中心共治疗了21例坏死性软组织感染患者。单灶性溃疡和非扩散性感染被排除在外。在这21例患者中,感染的初始分类包括38%为坏死性筋膜炎,38%为梭菌性坏疽,19%为细菌性协同性坏疽,5%为溶血性链球菌坏疽。71%的患者患有糖尿病或有免疫抑制证据。病程可追溯至43%由穿孔性脏器引起,43%由创伤性损伤引起。没有任何单一临床体征,包括组织积气,能够诊断特定类型的坏死性软组织感染。76%的培养结果显示为多种微生物菌群。总体死亡率为52%,截肢率为36%。进行适当外科治疗的平均时间为1.9天。在确认感染后24小时以上进行手术,死亡率为70%,而在确认感染后24小时以内进行手术,死亡率为36%。采用保守性较小的手术以保留组织,死亡率为71%,而最初进行包括所有失活组织的根治性手术,死亡率为43%。基于这些数据,我们得出结论,坏死性软组织感染的分类应简化为梭菌性和非梭菌性感染。无论组织损失情况如何,在液体复苏后应立即进行根治性手术清创,并且由于这些感染具有多种微生物的特性,从发病时起就必须使用广谱抗生素。