Ghibaudi Marco, Zanone Alessandro, Bonfanti Luca
Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), Orbassano, Italy.
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Neural Regen Res. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01438.
The capacity of the central nervous system for structural plasticity and regeneration is commonly believed to show a decreasing progression from "small and simple" brains to the larger, more complex brains of mammals. However, recent findings revealed that some forms of neural plasticity can show a reverse trend. Although plasticity is a well-preserved, transversal feature across the animal world, a variety of cell populations and mechanisms seem to have evolved to enable structural modifications to take place in widely different brains, likely as adaptations to selective pressures. Increasing evidence now indicates that a trade-off has occurred between regenerative (mostly stem cell-driven) plasticity and developmental (mostly juvenile) remodeling, with the latter primarily aimed not at brain repair but rather at "sculpting" the neural circuits based on experience. In particular, an evolutionary trade-off has occurred between neurogenic processes intended to support the possibility of recruiting new neurons throughout life and the different ways of obtaining new neurons, and between the different brain locations in which plasticity occurs. This review first briefly surveys the different types of plasticity and the complexity of their possible outcomes and then focuses on recent findings showing that the mammalian brain has a stem cell-independent integration of new neurons into pre-existing (mature) neural circuits. This process is still largely unknown but involves neuronal cells that have been blocked in arrested maturation since their embryonic origin (also termed "immature" or "dormant" neurons). These cells can then restart maturation throughout the animal's lifespan to become functional neurons in brain regions, such as the cerebral cortex and amygdala, that are relevant to high-order cognition and emotions. Unlike stem cell-driven postnatal/adult neurogenesis, which significantly decreases from small-brained, short-living species to large-brained ones, immature neurons are particularly abundant in large-brained, long-living mammals, including humans. The immature neural cell populations hosted in these complex brains are an interesting example of an "enlarged road" in the phylogenetic trend of plastic potential decreases commonly observed in the animal world. The topic of dormant neurons that covary with brain size and gyrencephaly represents a prospective turning point in the field of neuroplasticity, with important translational outcomes. These cells can represent a reservoir of undifferentiated neurons, potentially granting plasticity within the high-order circuits subserving the most sophisticated cognitive skills that are important in the growing brains of young, healthy individuals and are frequently affected by debilitating neurodevelopmental and degenerative disorders.
人们普遍认为,中枢神经系统的结构可塑性和再生能力呈现出一种递减趋势,即从“小而简单”的大脑到哺乳动物更大、更复杂的大脑。然而,最近的研究结果表明,某些形式的神经可塑性可能呈现相反的趋势。尽管可塑性是动物界中一种保存良好的横向特征,但似乎已经进化出了各种细胞群体和机制,以使结构修饰能够在差异很大的大脑中发生,这可能是对选择压力的适应。现在越来越多的证据表明,再生性(主要由干细胞驱动)可塑性和发育性(主要是幼年时期)重塑之间已经出现了权衡,后者主要目的不是脑修复,而是基于经验“塑造”神经回路。特别是,在旨在支持终生招募新神经元可能性的神经发生过程与获取新神经元的不同方式之间,以及在发生可塑性的不同脑区之间,已经出现了一种进化上的权衡。本综述首先简要概述了不同类型的可塑性及其可能结果的复杂性,然后重点关注最近的研究结果,这些结果表明哺乳动物大脑存在一种不依赖干细胞的将新神经元整合到预先存在的(成熟)神经回路中的现象。这个过程在很大程度上仍然未知,但涉及自胚胎起源以来就停滞在成熟阶段的神经元细胞(也称为“未成熟”或“休眠”神经元)。然后这些细胞可以在动物的整个生命周期中重新开始成熟,成为大脑区域(如与高阶认知和情感相关的大脑皮层和杏仁核)中的功能性神经元。与干细胞驱动的出生后/成体神经发生不同,后者从小脑、短命物种到大脑、长寿物种显著减少,未成熟神经元在包括人类在内的大脑、长寿哺乳动物中特别丰富。这些复杂大脑中存在的未成熟神经细胞群体是动物界中普遍观察到的可塑性潜力递减的系统发育趋势中“扩大路径”的一个有趣例子。与脑大小和脑回形成相关的休眠神经元这一主题代表了神经可塑性领域一个潜在的转折点,具有重要的转化成果。这些细胞可以代表未分化神经元的储备库,有可能在支持最复杂认知技能的高阶回路中赋予可塑性,这些认知技能在年轻、健康个体不断发育的大脑中很重要,并且经常受到使人衰弱的神经发育和退行性疾病的影响。