Meir M, Wiegering A, Sperschneider F, Hendricks A, Lock J F, Flemming S, Kelm M, Hahner S, Schlegel N, Germer C T, Reibetanz J
Department of General-, Visceral-, Transplant-, Vascular- and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 27;410(1):108. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03688-7.
While laparoscopic transabdominal or retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is standard care for adrenal tumors, benefits of robotic adrenalectomy (RA) are yet unclear. We evaluated the costs (including disposables), outcomes as well as the learning curve of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in a specialized center.
In retrospective analysis of our prospective database (ethical approval number 88/11) 263 LA were compared to 27 RA in the study period between 2018 and 2023. A propensity score match analysis was used to exclude possible confounders. Furthermore, the learning curve of RA was investigated.
Intraoperative Riva Rocci (RR) fluctuations (> 160mmHg, < 90 mmHg), early complications (within 30 days) and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in both groups. However, length of stay was decreased following robotic adrenalectomy (3.50d ± 1.81d compared to 4.61d ± 2.75d; p = 0.04). Due to this, overall costs of RA were lower compared to LA even if cost for disposables were slightly higher in the robotic group. An analysis of the learning curve of robotic adrenalectomy revealed that learning curve is completed after 5- 6th procedure.
Taken together our study supports the fact that RA is as secure and feasible as LA. Furthermore, it might provide advantages due to shorter length of stay, a short learning curve and similar costs compared to LA.
虽然腹腔镜经腹或腹膜后肾上腺切除术是肾上腺肿瘤的标准治疗方法,但机器人辅助肾上腺切除术(RA)的益处尚不清楚。我们在一个专业中心评估了机器人辅助肾上腺切除术和腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)的成本(包括一次性用品)、手术结果以及学习曲线。
在对我们前瞻性数据库(伦理批准号88/11)的回顾性分析中,将2018年至2023年研究期间的263例LA与27例RA进行了比较。采用倾向评分匹配分析来排除可能的混杂因素。此外,还研究了RA的学习曲线。
两组患者术中里瓦罗奇(RR)波动(>160mmHg,<90mmHg)、早期并发症(30天内)和术中失血量相当。然而,机器人辅助肾上腺切除术后住院时间缩短(分别为3.50天±1.81天和4.61天±2.75天;p = 0.04)。因此,即使机器人组一次性用品成本略高,RA的总体成本仍低于LA。对机器人辅助肾上腺切除术学习曲线的分析表明,学习曲线在第5 - 6次手术后完成。
综合来看,我们的研究支持RA与LA一样安全可行这一事实。此外,与LA相比,它可能具有住院时间短、学习曲线短和成本相似的优势。