• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下真空治疗对直肠癌患者吻合口漏非手术治疗的肿瘤学结局的影响。

The effects of endoscopic vacuum therapy for non-operative treatment of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients.

作者信息

Kollmann Catherine, Kusnezov Beata, Kollmann Lars, Schmitt Jasmin, Germer Christoph-Thomas, Lock Johan F, Flemming Sven

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstrasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 27;410(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03672-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03672-1
PMID:40146433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11950071/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Rectal resection has remained the cornerstone in curative treatment of rectal cancer. This however, implies the risk of anastomotic leakage leading to morbidity, mortality and potentially disease progression. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has emerged as a promising tool in leakage therapy in order to avoid reoperation and Hartman resection. However, its clinical efficacy and its potential effect on oncological outcomes still requires further research.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, we analysed all consecutive patients undergoing rectal resection for rectal cancer during 2012-2021. The incidence and management of anastomotic leakage and its effects on long-term oncological outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 334 patients underwent rectal resection of whom 47 patients (14.1%) developed postoperative anastomotic leakage. Non-operative leakage treatment (NOLT) was successful in in 76.9% of which EVT was the most efficient (90.0% success) while reoperation was successful in 52.4% (p = 0.073). The more frequent application of EVT increased the NOLT rate from 48.3 to 66.7% during the observation period (p = 0.176). Concerning long-term outcomes, no differences in disease-free survival (p = 0.657) nor patient survival (p = 0.295) could be determined.

CONCLUSION

EVT is an effective treatment option for anastomotic leakage after rectal resection. EVT enables NOLT in the majority of cases. However, there might be no impact on oncological outcomes.

摘要

目的

直肠切除术一直是直肠癌根治性治疗的基石。然而,这意味着存在吻合口漏的风险,可能导致发病、死亡,并有可能引发疾病进展。内镜下真空治疗(EVT)已成为一种有前景的漏口治疗工具,以避免再次手术和哈特曼切除术。然而,其临床疗效及其对肿瘤学结局的潜在影响仍需进一步研究。

方法

在这项回顾性单中心队列研究中,我们分析了2012年至2021年期间所有因直肠癌接受直肠切除术的连续患者。分析了吻合口漏的发生率、处理方法及其对长期肿瘤学结局的影响。

结果

共有334例患者接受了直肠切除术,其中47例(14.1%)发生了术后吻合口漏。非手术漏口治疗(NOLT)成功率为76.9%,其中EVT最为有效(成功率90.0%),而再次手术成功率为52.4%(p = 0.073)。在观察期内,EVT应用频率的增加使NOLT率从48.3%提高到66.7%(p = 0.176)。关于长期结局,在无病生存率(p = 0.657)和患者生存率(p = 0.295)方面均未发现差异。

结论

EVT是直肠切除术后吻合口漏的一种有效治疗选择。EVT在大多数情况下能够实现非手术漏口治疗。然而,其对肿瘤学结局可能没有影响。

相似文献

1
The effects of endoscopic vacuum therapy for non-operative treatment of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients.内镜下真空治疗对直肠癌患者吻合口漏非手术治疗的肿瘤学结局的影响。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 27;410(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03672-1.
2
Efficacy of endoluminal vacuum therapy in managing anastomotic leakage after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer patients.腔内负压疗法在直肠癌患者新辅助治疗后吻合口漏管理中的疗效
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 May;31(5):450-457. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.27078.
3
Comparison Between Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy and Conventional Treatment for Leakage After Rectal Resection.内镜下真空引流治疗与常规治疗在直肠切除术后漏口的对比。
World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1277-1282. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05349-5.
4
Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.低位前切除术治疗直肠癌吻合口漏的长期结果。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07109-4.
5
Systematic review of endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy as salvage treatment for rectal anastomotic leakage.系统评价腔内真空辅助治疗作为直肠吻合口漏的挽救治疗。
BJS Open. 2018 Dec 26;3(2):153-160. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50124. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in Colorectal Surgery.结直肠手术中的内镜下真空治疗
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Feb;20(2):328-34. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-3017-7. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
7
Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Left-Sided Colorectal Anastomotic Leak Without Fecal Diversion.内镜下真空治疗术在不进行粪便转流的情况下治疗左侧结直肠吻合口漏。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Mar 1;65(3):421-428. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001959.
8
Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy and Transanal Drainage for Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection.内镜下真空治疗联合经肛引流在直肠前切除术后吻合口漏中的长期疗效
In Vivo. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):2275-2278. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12956.
9
Effects of Adjuvant Therapy Compliance and Anastomotic Leakage on the Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Rectal Cancer After Curative Resection.辅助治疗依从性和吻合口漏对直肠癌患者根治性切除术后肿瘤学结局的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Jun 1;64(6):689-696. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001824.
10
Minimally invasive approaches to the management of anastomotic leakage following restorative rectal cancer resection.直肠癌保肛切除术后吻合口漏的微创处理方法。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;21(12):1364-1371. doi: 10.1111/codi.14742. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The Optimal Treatment Strategy for Postoperative Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy: a Comparative Analysis Between Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy and Conventional Treatment.食管切除术后吻合口漏的最佳治疗策略:内镜真空治疗与常规治疗的对比分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2899-2906. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05637-5. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
2
Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的预测因素:我们在哪里,我们要去哪里?
Curr Oncol. 2023 Mar 7;30(3):3111-3137. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030236.
3
Endoscopic vacuum therapy as a first-line treatment option for gastric leaks after bariatric surgery: evidence from 10 years of experience.
内镜下真空治疗作为减重手术后胃漏的一线治疗选择:来自 10 年经验的证据。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Sep;19(9):1041-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
4
The economic impact of anastomotic leak after colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的经济影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2023 Feb 16;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00425-y.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌(REAL):一项多中心随机对照试验的短期结果
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):991-1004. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
6
Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Left Hemicolectomy-Postoperative Inflammation Status, Short-Term Outcome and Cost Effectiveness.机器人辅助与腹腔镜左半结肠切除术-术后炎症状态、短期结果和成本效益。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;19(17):10606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710606.
7
Evolution of endoscopic vacuum therapy for upper gastrointestinal leakage over a 10-year period: a quality improvement study.内镜下真空引流治疗上消化道漏 10 年的演变:一项质量改进研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9169-9178. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09400-w. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group.直肠癌前切除术吻合口漏的危险因素(RALAR 研究):意大利外科肿瘤学会结直肠癌网络协作组的一项全国性回顾性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;24(3):264-276. doi: 10.1111/codi.15997. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
9
The economic burden of colorectal cancer across Europe: a population-based cost-of-illness study.欧洲结直肠癌的经济负担:一项基于人群的疾病成本研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Sep;6(9):709-722. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00147-3. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
10
Effects of Adjuvant Therapy Compliance and Anastomotic Leakage on the Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Rectal Cancer After Curative Resection.辅助治疗依从性和吻合口漏对直肠癌患者根治性切除术后肿瘤学结局的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Jun 1;64(6):689-696. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001824.