• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估基于机构的以人为本的孕产妇保健调查中的礼貌报告偏差:来自内罗毕和卢萨卡城市非正式住区的证据。

Assessing courtesy reporting bias in facility-based surveys on person-centred maternity care: evidence from urban informal settlements in Nairobi and Lusaka.

作者信息

Jiwani Safia S, Mutua Martin Kavao, Jacobs Choolwe, Musukuma Mwiche, Njeri Anne, Adero Godfrey, Ngosa Dennis, Abajobir Amanuel, Faye Cheikh Mbacké, Boerma Ties, Amouzou Agbessi

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

African Population and Health Research Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2025 Mar 28;15:04090. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04090.

DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.04090
PMID:40147000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11949514/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Experience of care is typically measured through client exit surveys administered in the facility. Evidence suggests that such measures suffer from courtesy reporting bias whereby respondents do not accurately report on their experiences while in the facility. We explored the presence of courtesy bias by comparing women's reported experience of person-centred maternity care (PCMC) from facility-based client exit surveys to mobile phone-based surveys out of the facility in Nairobi and Lusaka's urban informal settlements.

METHODS

We randomly and independently sampled women in the facilities for either a facility-based survey (n = 233 in Lusaka and n = 112 in Nairobi) or a mobile phone-based survey (n = 203 in Lusaka and n = 300 in Nairobi) within one to two weeks of facility discharge. The questionnaire included a validated PCMC scale. After adjusting for differences in women's characteristics across groups, we compared PCMC scores between facility and phone-based samples. We ran multilevel linear regression models to assess PCMC by survey modality in each city.

RESULTS

In both cities, over 70.0% of women were aged 20-34 years and were married, at least two thirds had secondary education, and over 95.0% were unaccompanied during labour/delivery. The overall PCMC score was 69.3% among women surveyed on the phone compared to 70.2% among those surveyed in the facility in Nairobi. In Lusaka, it was 57.5% on the phone compared to 56.8% in-facility. We found no statistically significant differences in PCMC scores between survey modalities in both cities, after adjusting for differences in women's characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not detect significant courtesy reporting bias in PCMC in facility-based client exit surveys in the context of urban informal settlements in Nairobi and Lusaka. Experience of PCMC can be measured through in-facility client exit surveys or mobile phone surveys. However, it is critical to address challenges related to a mobile phone-based approach.

摘要

背景

护理体验通常通过在医疗机构内进行的患者出院调查来衡量。有证据表明,此类测量存在礼貌性报告偏差,即受访者不会准确报告他们在医疗机构期间的体验。我们通过比较在基于医疗机构的患者出院调查中女性报告的以产妇为中心的护理(PCMC)体验与在内罗毕和卢萨卡城市非正式住区进行的基于手机的医疗机构外调查,来探究礼貌性偏差的存在情况。

方法

在患者出院后的一到两周内,我们在医疗机构中随机且独立地抽取女性进行基于医疗机构的调查(卢萨卡233例,内罗毕112例)或基于手机的调查(卢萨卡203例,内罗毕300例)。问卷包括一个经过验证的PCMC量表。在调整了各组女性特征的差异后,我们比较了基于医疗机构和基于手机的样本的PCMC得分。我们运行了多水平线性回归模型,以按每个城市的调查方式评估PCMC。

结果

在两个城市中,超过70.0%的女性年龄在20 - 34岁之间且已婚,至少三分之二的女性接受过中等教育,超过95.0%的女性在分娩时无人陪伴。在内罗毕,接受手机调查的女性的总体PCMC得分为69.3%,而在医疗机构接受调查的女性为70.2%。在卢萨卡,手机调查的得分为57.5%,医疗机构内调查的得分为56.8%。在调整了女性特征的差异后,我们发现两个城市中不同调查方式的PCMC得分没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

在内罗毕和卢萨卡城市非正式住区的背景下,我们在基于医疗机构的患者出院调查中未检测到PCMC方面存在显著的礼貌性报告偏差。PCMC体验可以通过医疗机构内的患者出院调查或手机调查来衡量。然而,应对与基于手机的方法相关的挑战至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4bb/11949514/8842d1fc91cb/jogh-15-04090-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4bb/11949514/8842d1fc91cb/jogh-15-04090-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4bb/11949514/8842d1fc91cb/jogh-15-04090-F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing courtesy reporting bias in facility-based surveys on person-centred maternity care: evidence from urban informal settlements in Nairobi and Lusaka.评估基于机构的以人为本的孕产妇保健调查中的礼貌报告偏差:来自内罗毕和卢萨卡城市非正式住区的证据。
J Glob Health. 2025 Mar 28;15:04090. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04090.
2
Levels and determinants of person-centred maternity care among women living in urban informal settlements: evidence from client exit surveys in Nairobi, Lusaka and Ouagadougou.城市非正规住区妇女以人为主导的孕产妇保健水平及决定因素:来自内罗毕、卢萨卡和瓦加杜古客户出院调查的证据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Mar 15;10(3):e017337. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017337.
3
Examining person-centered maternity care in a peri-urban setting in Embakasi, Nairobi, Kenya.探讨肯尼亚内罗毕恩巴萨基地区的围产期以人为主导的产妇护理。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0257542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257542. eCollection 2021.
4
Person-centered maternity care and satisfaction with post-abortion care: A facility-based cross-sectional survey in Northern Uganda.以患者为中心的孕产妇保健与堕胎后护理满意度:乌干达北部一项基于机构的横断面调查。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251318897. doi: 10.1177/17455057251318897.
5
Person-centred maternity care in low-income and middle-income countries: analysis of data from Kenya, Ghana, and India.中低收入国家的以人为主的孕产护理:来自肯尼亚、加纳和印度的数据分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e96-e109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30403-0.
6
Association between person-centered maternity care and newborn complications in Kenya.以产妇为中心的产时护理与肯尼亚新生儿并发症的关联。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;148(1):27-34. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12978. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale in India.印度以人为本的母婴护理量表的验证。
Reprod Health. 2018 Aug 29;15(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0591-7.
8
Associations between self-reported obstetric complications and experience of care: a secondary analysis of survey data from Ghana, Kenya, and India.自我报告的产科并发症与护理体验之间的关联:来自加纳、肯尼亚和印度的调查数据的二次分析。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 6;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01546-z.
9
Exploring women's childbirth experiences and perceptions of delivery care in peri-urban settings in Nairobi, Kenya.探索肯尼亚内罗毕城郊地区妇女的分娩经历和对分娩护理的看法。
Reprod Health. 2021 Apr 19;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01129-4.
10
Predictors of person-centered maternity care: the role of socioeconomic status, empowerment, and facility type.以产妇为中心的护理的预测因素:社会经济地位、赋权及机构类型的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 11;18(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3183-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Levels and determinants of person-centred maternity care among women living in urban informal settlements: evidence from client exit surveys in Nairobi, Lusaka and Ouagadougou.城市非正规住区妇女以人为主导的孕产妇保健水平及决定因素:来自内罗毕、卢萨卡和瓦加杜古客户出院调查的证据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Mar 15;10(3):e017337. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017337.
2
Disrespect and abuse of women during childbirth at health facilities in Eastern Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.东非医疗机构分娩期间对妇女的不尊重和虐待:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 20;10:1117116. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1117116. eCollection 2023.
3
Women's perceptions of telephone interviews about their experiences with childbirth care in Nigeria: A qualitative study.
尼日利亚女性对关于其分娩护理经历的电话访谈的看法:一项定性研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Apr 19;3(4):e0001833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001833. eCollection 2023.
4
To call or not to call: exploring the validity of telephone interviews to derive maternal self-reports of experiences with facility childbirth care in northern Nigeria.打还是不打:探索在尼日利亚北部使用电话访谈获取产妇对医疗机构分娩护理体验的自我报告的有效性。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Mar;7(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008017.
5
Tale of 22 cities: utilisation patterns and content of maternal care in large African cities.22 个城市的故事:大型非洲城市的孕产妇护理利用模式和内容。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Mar;7(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007803.
6
Examining person-centered maternity care in a peri-urban setting in Embakasi, Nairobi, Kenya.探讨肯尼亚内罗毕恩巴萨基地区的围产期以人为主导的产妇护理。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0257542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257542. eCollection 2021.
7
Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania.了解客户和提供者对产前保健服务质量的看法:来自坦桑尼亚的定性多方法研究。
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):011101. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.01101.
8
Person-centred maternity care in low-income and middle-income countries: analysis of data from Kenya, Ghana, and India.中低收入国家的以人为主的孕产护理:来自肯尼亚、加纳和印度的数据分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e96-e109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30403-0.
9
Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries.全民健康覆盖时代低质量卫生系统导致的死亡:137 个国家可避免死亡的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2203-2212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
10
Women's recall of maternal and newborn interventions received in the postnatal period: a validity study in Kenya and Swaziland.产妇对产后阶段接受的母婴干预措施的回忆:肯尼亚和斯威士兰的一项有效性研究。
J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010605. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010605.