• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性眼烧伤后角膜缘干细胞缺乏发生的危险因素

Risk Factors for Development of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency After Acute Ocular Burns.

作者信息

Kate Anahita, Rajagopal Raksheeth N, Sharma Supriya, Basu Sayan, Shanbhag Swapna S

机构信息

Shantilal Shanghvi Cornea Institute, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Vijayawada, India.

Shantilal Shanghvi Cornea Institute, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.

出版信息

Curr Eye Res. 2025 Jul;50(7):668-676. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2025.2482059. Epub 2025 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1080/02713683.2025.2482059
PMID:40147454
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify the risk factors predictive of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) in eyes with acute ocular burns (AOB).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, comparative case series which included 112 eyes of 96 patients with AOB of severity > Dua grade II who had follow-up until complete epithelization. Data on injury details, clinical features, and treatment were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for (i) LSCD following AOB, (ii) LSCD >6 clock hours, and (iii) LSCD requiring surgical intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 112 eyes, 61 eyes (54%) of 56 patients developed LSCD. The final median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was poorer in eyes with LSCD [logMAR 0.9 (IQR: 0.5-1.5)] when compared to the non-LSCD group [logMAR 0.1 (IQR: 0-0.3);  < .00001]. Regression analysis revealed lime injury (OR: 7.5,  = .002), conjunctival defect of >50% area (OR = 7.6,  = .0001), limbal epithelial defect of >6 clock hours (OR = 3.5,  = .02), and undergoing repeat AMT (OR: 15.3,  = .01) to be risk factors for the development of LSCD. For "LSCD of >6 clock hours", both conjunctival defect of >50% area [OR: 4.5 (CI: 1.2-16.9),  = .03] and limbal epithelial defect of >6 clock hours [OR: 9.6 (CI: 1.9-48.6),  = .006] were significant risk factors; while for the outcome "LSCD necessitating a surgical intervention", conjunctival defect of >50% area [OR: 4.1 (CI: 1.2-13.6),  = .03] was a risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lime injury, limbal epithelial defects, and conjunctival epithelial defects involving a larger area are at a higher risk of development of LSCD post AOB. Larger conjunctival defects indicate the development of more severe LSCD and a greater need for surgical intervention. Eyes with LSCD have poorer visual outcomes. Thus, preventing this entity by addressing the risk factors can alleviate the socioeconomic burden on the affected individuals and the healthcare system.

摘要

目的

确定急性眼烧伤(AOB)患者中预测角膜缘干细胞缺乏(LSCD)的危险因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性、比较性病例系列研究,纳入了96例AOB严重程度>Dua二级且随访至上皮完全愈合的患者的112只眼。收集了损伤细节、临床特征和治疗的数据。进行逻辑回归分析以确定(i)AOB后发生LSCD、(ii)LSCD>6个钟点、(iii)需要手术干预的LSCD的危险因素。

结果

在112只眼中,56例患者的61只眼(54%)发生了LSCD。与非LSCD组相比,发生LSCD的眼最终的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)中位数更差[logMAR 0.9(IQR:0.5 - 1.5)],而非LSCD组为[logMAR 0.1(IQR:0 - 0.3);P <.00001]。回归分析显示石灰烧伤(OR:7.5,P = 0.002)、结膜缺损面积>50%(OR = 7.6,P = 0.0001)、角膜缘上皮缺损>6个钟点(OR = 3.5,P = 0.02)以及接受重复羊膜移植(OR:15.3,P = 0.01)是发生LSCD的危险因素。对于“LSCD>6个钟点”,结膜缺损面积>50%[OR:4.5(CI:1.2 - 16.9),P = 0.03]和角膜缘上皮缺损>6个钟点[OR:9.6(CI:1.9 - 48.6),P = 0.006]均为显著危险因素;而对于“需要手术干预的LSCD”这一结果,结膜缺损面积>50%[OR:4.1(CI:1.2 - 13.6),P = 0.03]是危险因素。

结论

发生石灰烧伤、角膜缘上皮缺损和结膜上皮缺损面积较大的患者在AOB后发生LSCD的风险较高。较大的结膜缺损表明更严重的LSCD的发生以及更大的手术干预需求。发生LSCD的眼视力预后较差。因此,通过解决危险因素来预防这种情况可以减轻对受影响个体和医疗系统的社会经济负担。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Development of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency After Acute Ocular Burns.急性眼烧伤后角膜缘干细胞缺乏发生的危险因素
Curr Eye Res. 2025 Jul;50(7):668-676. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2025.2482059. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
2
Amniotic membrane transplantation for acute ocular burns.羊膜移植治疗急性眼部烧伤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 1;9(9):CD009379. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009379.pub3.
3
Outcomes of surgical interventions for the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency.角膜缘干细胞缺乏症的手术治疗结果。
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Jul;154(1):51-61. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1139_18.
4
A systematic literature review of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency in humans.一项关于人类角膜缘干细胞缺乏症手术干预的系统文献综述。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;146(2):251-259. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.03.018. Epub 2008 May 16.
5
A systematic review of cellular therapies for the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency affecting one or both eyes.一项关于治疗影响单眼或双眼的角膜缘干细胞缺陷的细胞疗法的系统评价。
Ocul Surf. 2021 Apr;20:48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.12.008. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
6
Classification and treatment approach of chemical burn associated Limbal stem cell deficiency: based on novel global consensus.化学烧伤相关角膜缘干细胞缺乏的分类与治疗方法:基于新的全球共识
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 24;45(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03389-y.
7
Demographics of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency: A Literature Review.角膜缘干细胞缺乏的人口统计学:文献综述。
Eye Contact Lens. 2025 Apr 10;51(7):300-303. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001184.
8
Diagnostic criteria for limbal stem cell deficiency-a systematic literature review.角膜缘干细胞缺乏的诊断标准——一项系统文献综述
Surv Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul-Aug;62(4):522-532. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
9
Clinical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty after autologous cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation for ocular surface burns.自体培养角膜缘上皮移植治疗眼表烧伤后穿透性角膜移植的临床疗效。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;152(6):917-924.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.019.
10
Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.基于穹窿部的与基于角巩膜缘的结膜小梁切除术瓣治疗青光眼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 26;8(8):CD009380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009380.pub3.