Suppr超能文献

成年雄性斯普拉格-道利大鼠全脑质子常规剂量率或超高剂量率(FLASH)照射的影响。

Effects of whole brain proton irradiation at conventional or ultra-high dose rate (FLASH), in adult male Sprague Dawley rats.

作者信息

Williams Michael T, Regan Samantha L, Fritz Adam L, Gollaway Brooke M, Mascia Anthony E, Vatner Ralph E, Perentesis John P, Vorhees Charles V

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.

Division of Neurology (MLC 7044), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94534-9.

Abstract

Radiation is an effective treatment for many brain tumors, but often causes cognitive impairment. Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy is less toxic to many normal tissues and may protect against adverse cognitive effects of cranial irradiation. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats received a single 18 Gy fraction of cranial irradiation with protons at 1 Gy/s (CV), 60 Gy/s (FLASH-60), 95 Gy/s (FLASH-95), or sham treatment (Control) (n ≥ 22/group). Rats were tested in open-field, acoustic (ASR) and tactile startle (TSR), novelty preference, radial water maze (RWM), Morris water maze (MWM), Cincinnati water maze configurations A and B (CWM-A CWM-B), and novelty tests. Locomotion was decreased and TSR increased in all irradiated rats and ASR increased in FLASH-95 rats compared with Controls. In MWM acquisition and reversal, the CV and FLASH-60 rats had reduced path efficiency but during shift and shift reversal all irradiated rats had increased latencies and reduced path efficiencies compared with Controls. In CWM-A all irradiated rats performed below Controls. There were no differences found in CWM-B, novelty tests, or RWM. In summary, FLASH treatment after 18 Gy cranial proton irradiation did not result in reduced cognitive toxicity.

摘要

放射治疗是许多脑肿瘤的有效治疗方法,但常导致认知障碍。超高剂量率(FLASH)放射治疗对许多正常组织的毒性较小,可能预防颅脑照射的不良认知效应。成年雄性Sprague Dawley大鼠接受单次18 Gy颅部质子照射,剂量率分别为1 Gy/s(常规放疗,CV)、60 Gy/s(FLASH-60)、95 Gy/s(FLASH-95)或假照射(对照)(每组n≥22只)。对大鼠进行旷场试验、听觉惊跳反应(ASR)和触觉惊跳反应(TSR)、新奇偏好试验、放射状水迷宫(RWM)、莫里斯水迷宫(MWM)、辛辛那提水迷宫A和B构型(CWM-A、CWM-B)以及新奇性试验。与对照组相比,所有照射组大鼠的运动能力均下降,TSR增加,FLASH-95组大鼠的ASR增加。在MWM获取和逆转试验中,CV组和FLASH-60组大鼠的路径效率降低,但在转换和转换逆转试验中,与对照组相比,所有照射组大鼠的潜伏期均延长,路径效率均降低。在CWM-A中,所有照射组大鼠的表现均低于对照组。在CWM-B、新奇性试验或RWM中未发现差异。总之,18 Gy颅部质子照射后进行FLASH治疗并未降低认知毒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6968/11950509/a5d8a93f9bdf/41598_2025_94534_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验