Williams Michael T, Regan Samantha L, Fritz Adam L, Gollaway Brooke M, Mascia Anthony E, Vatner Ralph E, Perentesis John P, Vorhees Charles V
Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Division of Neurology (MLC 7044), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94534-9.
Radiation is an effective treatment for many brain tumors, but often causes cognitive impairment. Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy is less toxic to many normal tissues and may protect against adverse cognitive effects of cranial irradiation. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats received a single 18 Gy fraction of cranial irradiation with protons at 1 Gy/s (CV), 60 Gy/s (FLASH-60), 95 Gy/s (FLASH-95), or sham treatment (Control) (n ≥ 22/group). Rats were tested in open-field, acoustic (ASR) and tactile startle (TSR), novelty preference, radial water maze (RWM), Morris water maze (MWM), Cincinnati water maze configurations A and B (CWM-A CWM-B), and novelty tests. Locomotion was decreased and TSR increased in all irradiated rats and ASR increased in FLASH-95 rats compared with Controls. In MWM acquisition and reversal, the CV and FLASH-60 rats had reduced path efficiency but during shift and shift reversal all irradiated rats had increased latencies and reduced path efficiencies compared with Controls. In CWM-A all irradiated rats performed below Controls. There were no differences found in CWM-B, novelty tests, or RWM. In summary, FLASH treatment after 18 Gy cranial proton irradiation did not result in reduced cognitive toxicity.
放射治疗是许多脑肿瘤的有效治疗方法,但常导致认知障碍。超高剂量率(FLASH)放射治疗对许多正常组织的毒性较小,可能预防颅脑照射的不良认知效应。成年雄性Sprague Dawley大鼠接受单次18 Gy颅部质子照射,剂量率分别为1 Gy/s(常规放疗,CV)、60 Gy/s(FLASH-60)、95 Gy/s(FLASH-95)或假照射(对照)(每组n≥22只)。对大鼠进行旷场试验、听觉惊跳反应(ASR)和触觉惊跳反应(TSR)、新奇偏好试验、放射状水迷宫(RWM)、莫里斯水迷宫(MWM)、辛辛那提水迷宫A和B构型(CWM-A、CWM-B)以及新奇性试验。与对照组相比,所有照射组大鼠的运动能力均下降,TSR增加,FLASH-95组大鼠的ASR增加。在MWM获取和逆转试验中,CV组和FLASH-60组大鼠的路径效率降低,但在转换和转换逆转试验中,与对照组相比,所有照射组大鼠的潜伏期均延长,路径效率均降低。在CWM-A中,所有照射组大鼠的表现均低于对照组。在CWM-B、新奇性试验或RWM中未发现差异。总之,18 Gy颅部质子照射后进行FLASH治疗并未降低认知毒性。