Can Elif, Elkilany Aboelyazid, Paparoditis Sophia, Gebauer Bernhard, Geisel Dominik, Krenzien Felix, Pohrt Anne, Uller Wibke, Doppler Michael, Ebel Sebastian, Gößmann Holger, Fehrenbach Uli
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
CVIR Endovasc. 2025 Mar 28;8(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s42155-025-00537-y.
To assess the efficacy of segmental right portal vein embolization (SRPVE) versus main right portal vein embolization (MRPVE) in preoperative preparation for major hepatectomy.
This retrospective single-center study included 220 consecutive patients who underwent portal vein embolization (PVE) before (extended) right hemihepatectomy between January 2014 and June 2021. Seventy-one patients underwent selective segmental embolization (SRPVE) and 149 patients underwent MRPVE. Volumetric analysis was conducted before PVE and before surgery. Key endpoints included evaluation of future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy, intraoperative complexity, and postoperative complications, technical success, clinical success, complications (Clavien-Dindo and CIRSE classifications), as well as evaluation of different factors which may influence hypertrophy of the FLR.
Technical success rate was 100% in the SRPVE group and 99.3% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.15). Clinical success rate was comparable between both techniques, measuring 95.8% in the SRPVE group and 95.3% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.18). Absolute hypertrophy (FLRabh) of the FLR was comparable between both techniques, measuring 47.15% in the SRPVE group and 40.78% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.54). Complication rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.12). Partial thrombosis involving the left portal vein, main portal vein, or mesentericosplenic region was observed in 2.8% of the patients in the SRPVE group vs 3.4% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.95). CIRSE Class II-VI complications were slightly higher in the MRPVE group (10.7% vs 9.8%, p = 0.82). Postoperative complications with Clavien-Dindo class ≥ IIIa occurred in 10.1% % in the MRPVE group vs 9.9% the SRPVE group (p = 0.92). Liver cirrhosis had a significant negative correlation with sFLR % increase following PVE (r = -0.54; p = 0.027). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was also associated with reduced FLR hypertrophy following PVE, with a median sFLR% change of 63.8% (IQR: 60.8% - 75.2%) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 66 patients, 30%) compared to 82.6% (IQR: 77.4% - 84.2%) in those without chemotherapy (n = 154 patients, 70%).
Selective segmental right portal vein embolization, sparing the main right portal vein, offers a safe and effective alternative to MRPVE, achieving comparable FLR hypertrophy while potentially simplifying intraoperative procedures and reducing postprocedural complications. Future research should focus on conducting large, prospective, multicenter trials to further compare the long-term outcomes of this technique, particularly with regard to liver regeneration, postoperative liver function, complications and overall survival.
评估节段性右门静脉栓塞术(SRPVE)与主右门静脉栓塞术(MRPVE)在扩大右半肝切除术术前准备中的疗效。
这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2014年1月至2021年6月期间连续220例行(扩大)右半肝切除术前行门静脉栓塞术(PVE)的患者。71例患者接受了选择性节段性栓塞术(SRPVE),149例患者接受了MRPVE。在PVE前和手术前进行体积分析。主要终点包括评估未来肝残余(FLR)肥大、术中复杂性和术后并发症、技术成功率、临床成功率、并发症(Clavien-Dindo和CIRSE分类),以及评估可能影响FLR肥大的不同因素。
SRPVE组技术成功率为100%,MRPVE组为99.3%(p = 0.15)。两种技术的临床成功率相当,SRPVE组为95.8%,MRPVE组为95.3%(p = 0.18)。两组间FLR的绝对肥大率(FLRabh)相当,SRPVE组为47.15%,MRPVE组为40.78%(p = 0.54)。并发症发生率无显著差异(p = 0.12)。SRPVE组2.8%的患者出现涉及左门静脉、主门静脉或肠系膜脾区的部分血栓形成,MRPVE组为3.4%(p = 0.95)。MRPVE组CIRSE II-VI级并发症略高(10.7%对9.8%,p = 0.82)。Clavien-Dindo分级≥IIIa级的术后并发症在MRPVE组中发生率为10.1%,SRPVE组为9.9%(p = 0.92)。肝硬化与PVE后sFLR%增加呈显著负相关(r = -0.54;p = 需注意,你提供的文本中“Postoperative complications with Clavien-Dindo class ≥ IIIa occurred in 10.1% % in the MRPVE group vs 9.9% the SRPVE group (p = 0.92).”这里MRPVE组的10.1%后面多了个百分号,我按照正确理解翻译了。0.027)。新辅助化疗也与PVE后FLR肥大减少有关,接受新辅助化疗的患者(n = 66例,30%)的sFLR%变化中位数为63.8%(IQR:60.8% - 75.2%),而未接受化疗的患者(n = 154例,70%)为82.6%(IQR:77.4% - 84.2%)。
选择性节段性右门静脉栓塞术,保留主右门静脉,可以作为MRPVE的一种安全有效的替代方法,在实现相当的FLR肥大的同时,可能简化术中操作并减少术后并发症。未来的研究应集中于开展大型、前瞻性、多中心试验,以进一步比较该技术的长期疗效,特别是在肝再生、术后肝功能、并发症和总生存方面。