English D C
Am Surg. 1985 Jul;51(7):423-5.
Three clinical cases are summarized to provide examples of reasonably common dilemmas in decision making. Instead of a focus on the solutions, the issue of "who decides" is raised. Contrary to frequent practice, the position is taken that, legally and ethically, substantive patient involvement is required. Factors implicated in physician dominance are briefly discussed, including subjectivity, medical care environments, and notions of the proper role of the physician. Suggestions for the surgeon's role include professional competence, patient education (including effective communication), and separation of the medical/technical aspects of decisions from the ethical/personal ones.
总结了三个临床病例,以举例说明决策中相当常见的困境。本文未聚焦于解决方案,而是提出了“谁来做决定”的问题。与常见做法相反,本文认为,从法律和伦理角度来看,患者需要实质性地参与其中。简要讨论了导致医生主导的因素,包括主观性、医疗环境以及对医生恰当角色的观念。对外科医生角色的建议包括专业能力、患者教育(包括有效沟通),以及将决策的医学/技术方面与伦理/个人方面分开。