Suppr超能文献

医学专家提供临床工作整合式照护(CWIC)的程度及其感知到的角色责任:一项混合方法研究。

The extent to which medical specialists provide Clinical Work-Integrating Care (CWIC) and their perceived role-responsibility: a mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Kluit Lana, de Wind Astrid, Beumer Annechien, van Bennekom Coen A M, de Boer Angela G E M

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Societal Participation and Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12137-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Awareness among medical specialists about patient work concerns is important because work and health are linked. In Clinical Work-Integrating Care (CWIC), specialists adopt the notion that work can affect health, and medical actions can affect work participation, and they act according to that notion. This study aims to assess the extent to which specialists provide CWIC and to obtain perceptions of medical specialists about their professional role-responsibility in providing CWIC.

METHODS

This cross-sectional mixed-methods study involved quantitative questionnaires and qualitative interviews with medical specialists. The self-developed 18-item questionnaire evaluated the extent and type of CWIC provision (rating scale 0-4; Never = 0 to Always = 4) and how role-responsibility was perceived, while the interviews offered more in-depth insights. Descriptive statistics for the questionnaire data and thematic analyses for the interview data were applied.

RESULTS

We attained 160 questionnaires (female 64%, 93% non-surgical specialists) and 11 interviews (female 64%, 91% non-surgical specialists). Specialists often asked patients about work (mean score 3.1), sometimes about work history (mean score 2.2) and the conversation about work was usually started by the specialist (mean score 2.9). Conversations about work often concerned the influence of work on disease (2.4) and the influence of disease (2.5) or treatment (2.1) on work ability, but rarely about the legal aspects related to sick leave (1.5). The specialists' perceived role-responsibility was summarized in three themes: 1) understanding that work and health (problems) are linked including asking patients about work and investigating work factors, 2) supporting work participation within a specialist's expertise including focus on patients' health and prevention of sick leave, and 3) possibilities and limitations of the healthcare system including work participation as treatment goal and cooperation with occupational health care.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical specialists in our survey usually asked about patients' work, but they often did not take a work history. Limitations within the healthcare system hinder comprehensive work-integrating support by specialists, defining the boundaries of CWIC to within hospital care.

摘要

背景

医学专家对患者工作相关问题的认识很重要,因为工作与健康相互关联。在临床工作整合照护(CWIC)中,专家秉持工作会影响健康且医疗行为会影响工作参与的观念,并据此采取行动。本研究旨在评估专家提供CWIC的程度,并了解医学专家对其在提供CWIC方面专业角色责任的看法。

方法

这项横断面混合方法研究涉及对医学专家进行定量问卷调查和定性访谈。自行编制的18项问卷评估了CWIC提供的程度和类型(评分量表0 - 4;从不 = 0至总是 = 4)以及对角色责任的认知方式,而访谈则提供了更深入的见解。对问卷数据应用描述性统计,对访谈数据进行主题分析。

结果

我们获得了160份问卷(女性占64%,93%为非外科专家)和11次访谈(女性占64%,91%为非外科专家)。专家经常询问患者的工作情况(平均得分3.1),有时询问工作经历(平均得分2.2),且关于工作的谈话通常由专家开启(平均得分2.9)。关于工作的谈话常涉及工作对疾病的影响(2.4)以及疾病(2.5)或治疗(2.1)对工作能力的影响,但很少涉及与病假相关的法律方面(1.5)。专家对角色责任的认知归纳为三个主题:1)理解工作与健康(问题)相互关联,包括询问患者工作情况和调查工作因素;2)在专家专业范围内支持工作参与,包括关注患者健康和预防病假;3)医疗系统的可能性和局限性,包括将工作参与作为治疗目标以及与职业健康护理合作。

结论

我们调查中的医学专家通常会询问患者的工作情况,但他们往往不了解工作经历。医疗系统的局限性阻碍了专家提供全面的工作整合支持,将CWIC的范围限定在医院护理之内。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/408e/11948937/0cfccbc5ea87/12913_2024_12137_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验