The Effect of Audio and Audiovisual Distraction on Pain and Anxiety in Patients Receiving Outpatient Perineal Prostate Biopsies: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Audio and audiovisual distraction can be effective additive tools to reduce anxiety and pain in patients receiving outpatient procedures (OP). Audiovisual distraction tools already showed positive effects on pain perception in some urological procedures. To identify the effects of audio and audiovisual distraction on pain and anxiety in patients receiving perineal prostate biopsy (PPB), we performed a prospective randomized controlled study. : We recruited 168 male patients undergoing PPB which were randomized into three groups: a control group (CG), an audio distraction group (ADG) and an audiovisual distraction group (AVDG). The CG received no intervention, while the ADG received audio distraction and the AVDG received audiovisual distraction while PPB was performed. The primary endpoint was pain perception, measured in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints were subjective and objective procedure time (SPT/OPT), heart rate, blood pressure, cortisol blood levels and scores in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire. : Demographics of each group were similar (CG = mean age (a) = 69.5; ADG a = 67 years; AVDG a = 67). We did not find any significant difference regarding our primary endpoint, pain perception ( = 0.384). In contrast, we examined a highly significant difference between SPT and OPT, comparing AVDG to CG ( < 0.001) and AVDG to ADG ( < 0.001), but not for ADG to CG ( = 0.348). There was no significant difference in the secondary endpoints, heart rate, blood pressure, STAI scores and willingness to repeat the procedure. : Our study shows that audiovisual distraction can significantly shorten SPT for patients receiving PPB, which may represent their comfort throughout the procedure. To accelerate the wider implementation of audiovisual distraction as a cost-efficient tool in outpatient urological procedures, further studies should examine its effect on different OPs with a more heterogeneous patient group.