Abdel Ghafar Mohamed A, Abdelraouf Osama R, Alkhamees Nouf H, Mohamed Mariam E, Harraz Eman M, Seyam Mohamed K, Ibrahim Zizi M, Alnamnakani Amani, Elborady Amal A, Radwan Rafik E
Physical Therapy Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):305. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030305.
: Manual dexterity and hand strength are common challenges in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), limiting the use of their affected upper limb and impacting daily activities. The efficacy of a long-duration Mirror Visual Feedback (MVF) program compared to Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) in addressing these issues remains unreported. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of mCIMT and MVF in improving manual dexterity and hand strength in children with UCP. : Fifty children with UCP (aged 5-9 years) were randomly assigned to either the MVF or mCIMT group. Children in both groups received their respective interventions for 30 min, five times per week, over 12 weeks. Additionally, all participants underwent traditional physical therapy for 12 weeks, three times per week, with each session lasting 45 to 60 min. Manual dexterity was assessed using the Box and Block Test (BBT), and maximum isometric hand strength was measured with a hydraulic handheld dynamometer. Evaluations were conducted before the intervention and 12 weeks later. : Repeated measures of MANOVA revealed significant enhancements in manual dexterity and hand strength in both groups after the intervention. However, the mCIMT group demonstrated significantly greater gains in BBT scores ( = 0.014) and maximum isometric hand strength ( = 0.017) compared to the MVF group, with effect sizes of respectively. : Incorporating either mCIMT or MVF into rehabilitation significantly enhances manual dexterity and hand strength in children with UCP, with mCIMT yielding superior outcomes.
手部灵活性和握力是单侧脑瘫(UCP)儿童常见的挑战,限制了他们患侧上肢的使用并影响日常活动。与改良的强制性使用运动疗法(mCIMT)相比,长期镜像视觉反馈(MVF)计划在解决这些问题方面的疗效尚未见报道。本研究旨在比较mCIMT和MVF在改善UCP儿童手部灵活性和握力方面的疗效。
50名UCP儿童(5至9岁)被随机分配到MVF组或mCIMT组。两组儿童每周接受5次各自的干预,每次30分钟,为期12周。此外,所有参与者接受为期12周、每周3次的传统物理治疗,每次治疗持续45至60分钟。使用箱块测试(BBT)评估手部灵活性,并用液压手持测力计测量最大等长握力。在干预前和12周后进行评估。
重复测量的多变量方差分析显示,干预后两组儿童的手部灵活性和握力均有显著提高。然而,与MVF组相比,mCIMT组在BBT评分(P = 0.014)和最大等长握力(P = 0.017)方面的改善更为显著,效应大小分别为 。
将mCIMT或MVF纳入康复治疗可显著提高UCP儿童的手部灵活性和握力,其中mCIMT的效果更佳。