Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia
Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Pediatrics. 2021 Nov;148(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-033878. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
With the Children with Hemiparesis Arm and Hand Movement Project (CHAMP) multisite factorial randomized controlled trial, we compared 2 doses and 2 constraint types of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) to usual customary treatment (UCT).
CHAMP randomly assigned 118 2- to 8-year-olds with hemiparetic cerebral palsy to one of 5 treatments with assessments at baseline, end of treatment, and 6 months posttreatment. Primary blinded outcomes were the assisting hand assessment; Peabody Motor Development Scales, Second Edition, Visual Motor Integration; and Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test Dissociated Movement. Parents rated functioning on the Pediatric Evaluation of Disabilities Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test Daily Activities and Child Motor Activity Log How Often scale. Analyses were focused on blinded and parent-report outcomes and rank-order gains across all measures.
Findings varied in statistical significance when analyzing individual blinded outcomes. parent reports, and rank-order gains. Consistently, high-dose CIMT, regardless of constraint type, produced a pattern of greatest short- and long-term gains (1.7% probability of occurring by chance alone) and significant gains on visual motor integration and dissociated movement at 6 months. O'Brien's rank-order analyses revealed high-dose CIMT produced significantly greater improvement than a moderate dose or UCT. All CIMT groups improved significantly more in parent-reported functioning, compared with that of UCT. Children with UCT also revealed objective gains (eg, 48% exceeded the smallest-detectable assisting hand assessment change, compared with 71% high-dose CIMT at the end of treatment).
CHAMP provides novel albeit complex findings: although most individual blinded outcomes fell below statistical significance for group differences, high-dose CIMT consistently produced the largest improvements at both time points. An unexpected finding concerns shifts in UCT toward higher dosages, with improved outcomes compared with previous reports.
通过儿童偏瘫上肢和手运动项目(CHAMP)多中心析因随机对照试验,我们比较了 2 种剂量和 2 种约束类型的强制性运动疗法(CIMT)与常规习惯治疗(UCT)。
CHAMP 随机分配 118 名 2 至 8 岁偏瘫脑瘫儿童接受 5 种治疗中的一种,在基线、治疗结束和治疗后 6 个月进行评估。主要盲法结局是辅助手评估;Peabody 运动发育量表,第二版,视觉运动整合;以及上肢技能测试分离运动的质量。家长根据残疾儿童评估问卷-计算机自适应测试日常生活和儿童运动活动日志经常程度量表对功能进行评分。分析集中在盲法和家长报告结果以及所有测量指标的等级收益上。
当分析单独的盲法结果、家长报告和等级收益时,结果在统计学意义上有所不同。高剂量 CIMT,无论约束类型如何,都产生了一种短期和长期收益最大(单独发生的概率为 1.7%)的模式,并且在 6 个月时视觉运动整合和分离运动有显著收益。奥布赖恩的等级分析显示,高剂量 CIMT 比中等剂量或 UCT 产生显著更大的改善。与 UCT 相比,所有 CIMT 组在家长报告的功能方面都有显著改善。UCT 组的儿童也表现出客观的收益(例如,治疗结束时,48%的儿童辅助手评估变化超过最小可检测变化,而高剂量 CIMT 为 71%)。
CHAMP 提供了新颖但复杂的发现:尽管大多数单独的盲法结果在组间差异方面未达到统计学意义,但高剂量 CIMT 始终在两个时间点产生最大的改善。一个意外的发现是 UCT 向更高剂量的转变,与以往报告相比,结果有所改善。