Hernández Hernández Sonia, Marín Quinto Sergio, Guillén Martín Verónica Marina, Mumbardó-Adam Cristina
Equity and Innovation in Education, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.
Department of Philology, Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, Universidad de Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 27;15(3):281. doi: 10.3390/bs15030281.
People with intellectual disabilities live with significant conceptual, social, and practical limitations that hinder the acquisition, development, and use of language. Pragmatic skills facilitate interpersonal relationships, allowing for the understanding and expression of oneself, as well as the planning, organization, and adaptation of speech depending on the context and interlocutor. These skills imply, therefore, complex higher functions that must be articulated harmoniously for effective communication. Identifying the weaknesses of people with intellectual disability in the pragmatic dimension of language enables the provision of individualized support resources to guarantee their participation and social inclusion. This study presents a systematic review based on the PRISMA guidelines, and it includes the most commonly used assessment tools for pragmatic competence in people with intellectual disabilities over time. Of the 172 articles found, 20 met the inclusion criteria and were finally reviewed. The results show a lack of conformity between instruments in the pragmatic aspects evaluated and a lack of adjustment of the evaluation tools to the characteristics of this population. Therefore, the design of new standardized tests that specifically evaluate the pragmatic skills of people with intellectual disability is required in the near future. A tailored assessment is crucial for defining a complete profile of their communication skills and generating individualized intervention and support programs.
智力残疾者生活在严重的概念、社交和实际限制之中,这些限制阻碍了语言的习得、发展和使用。语用技能有助于人际关系的建立,使人能够理解和表达自己,并根据语境和对话者的情况规划、组织和调整言语。因此,这些技能意味着复杂的高级功能,必须和谐地衔接起来才能实现有效的沟通。识别智力残疾者在语言语用维度上的弱点,能够提供个性化的支持资源,以确保他们的参与和社会融入。本研究基于PRISMA指南进行了系统综述,涵盖了长期以来用于评估智力残疾者语用能力的最常用评估工具。在检索到的172篇文章中,20篇符合纳入标准并最终得到综述。结果表明,在所评估的语用方面,各工具之间缺乏一致性,且评估工具与该人群的特征不匹配。因此,在不久的将来需要设计专门评估智力残疾者语用技能的新标准化测试。量身定制的评估对于全面了解他们的沟通技能概况以及制定个性化的干预和支持计划至关重要。