Suppr超能文献

使用不同机器学习回归方法通过颈椎测量预测骨龄

Prediction of Skeletal Age Through Cervical Vertebral Measurements Using Different Machine Learning Regression Methods.

作者信息

Yılmaz İrem, Gonca Merve

机构信息

Private Practice, İstanbul, Türkiye.

Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Eskişehir, Türkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2025 Mar 27;38(1):36-48. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2025.2024.30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare skeletal ages determined using three different regression methods from measurements made on cervical vertebrae from lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCRs) with the skeletal age determined from hand-wrist radiographs (HWRs).

METHODS

LCRs and HWRs of 794 individuals (329 boys, 465 girls) aged 7-18 years were examined. The hand-wrist skeletal age of the participants was determined using the Greulich-Pyle (GP) atlas. Forty-four linear and nine angular morphometric measurements in the C2-C5 vertebrae were made in LCRs. Vertebral skeletal age (VSA) was determined in both sexes using Ridge, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and ElasticNet regression methods. The study results were evaluated using R2 (explainability power). Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine the consistency of chronologic age (CA), GP age, and VSAs.

RESULTS

LASSO regression showed the highest explainability power for VSA, with boys at 0.783 and girls at 0.741. In both sexes, the vertebral depth of concavities had high beta coefficients, and the posterior height of C3 vertebrae (TVup-TVlp) had the highest beta coefficient in boys in LASSO regression. The width of the limits of agreement in both CA and VSA graphs of GP age was wider in boys than in girls. The width of the limits of agreement of CA-VSAs was wider in girls than in boys.

CONCLUSION

Although high R2 values were obtained, VSA showed no superiority over CA in the assessment of skeletal age, and no significant clinical advantage was observed. For the Turkish population, using GP age may be more accurate for determining skeletal age in orthodontic treatment planning.

摘要

目的

比较通过三种不同回归方法根据头颅侧位片(LCR)上颈椎测量值确定的骨骼年龄与通过手腕部X线片(HWR)确定的骨骼年龄。

方法

对794名年龄在7至18岁的个体(329名男孩,465名女孩)的LCR和HWR进行检查。使用格雷利希-派尔(GP)图谱确定参与者的手腕部骨骼年龄。在LCR上对C2 - C5椎体进行了44项线性和9项角度形态测量。使用岭回归、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)以及弹性网络回归方法确定两性的椎体骨骼年龄(VSA)。使用R2(可解释性能力)评估研究结果。进行布兰德-奥特曼分析以确定实际年龄(CA)、GP年龄和VSA的一致性。

结果

LASSO回归对VSA显示出最高的可解释性能力,男孩为0.783,女孩为0.741。在两性中,椎体凹陷深度的β系数较高,在LASSO回归中,男孩的C3椎体后高度(TVup - TVlp)的β系数最高。GP年龄的CA和VSA图中一致性界限的宽度在男孩中比在女孩中更宽。CA - VSA的一致性界限宽度在女孩中比在男孩中更宽。

结论

尽管获得了较高的R2值,但VSA在骨骼年龄评估中并不优于CA,也未观察到明显的临床优势。对于土耳其人群,在正畸治疗计划中使用GP年龄可能更准确地确定骨骼年龄。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683f/11976326/c9b6162757fb/TurkJOrthod-38-1-36-figure-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验