Jayasuriya Njass, Munasinghe B M, Subramaniam Nishanthan, Lokuliyana Sameera Prasanga, Withanage Dmp, Ravihari Kal
Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Base Hospital, Thambuththegama, LKA.
Anaesthesiology, Mackay Base Hospital, Queensland, AUS.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 25;17(2):e79615. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79615. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Background The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is utilised globally to enhance communication and teamwork, ensuring patient safety in surgeries and reducing complications and mortality. Despite its efficacy, compliance with the checklist may be variable, particularly in resource-limited settings. This audit evaluated the adherence to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in the surgical theatre of Base Hospital Thambuththegama, Sri Lanka, to identify the gaps and areas for improvement. Methods A prospective audit assessed 102 surgical cases over three weeks, including elective and non-elective procedures. Data collection involved real-time observation of checklist use and assessment of staff participation. Compliance was evaluated based on checklist attachment, completion, and timing, while staff participation rates were analysed across roles. Results In 87.25% of cases, the checklist was attached to the bed head ticket (BHT). Fully completed checklists were observed in only 34.31% of cases, with just 13.73% completed at the correct time. Staff participation was highest among anaesthetists (90.5%) and house officers (88.1%) but significantly lower among consultants (7.1%). Key barriers included incomplete sections, incorrect timing, and inconsistent participation from senior staff. Conclusions The audit highlights critical gaps in compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, emphasising the need for targeted interventions. These include staff training, real-time monitoring, and enhanced accountability. Addressing these gaps can significantly improve surgical safety and patient outcomes. A re-audit is planned to evaluate the impact of the proposed changes.
背景 世界卫生组织(WHO)手术安全核对表在全球范围内被用于加强沟通与团队合作,确保手术中的患者安全,减少并发症和死亡率。尽管其具有有效性,但对核对表的遵守情况可能存在差异,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。本次审计评估了斯里兰卡坦布图格马基地医院手术室对WHO手术安全核对表的遵守情况,以找出差距和改进领域。方法 一项前瞻性审计在三周内评估了102例手术病例,包括择期和非择期手术。数据收集包括对核对表使用的实时观察和对工作人员参与情况的评估。根据核对表的附着、完成情况和时间进行合规性评估,同时分析不同角色的工作人员参与率。结果 在87.25%的病例中,核对表附在了床头卡(BHT)上。仅在34.31%的病例中观察到核对表完全填写完整,只有13.73%在正确时间完成。麻醉师(90.5%)和住院医生(88.1%)的工作人员参与率最高,但顾问的参与率显著较低(7.1%)。主要障碍包括部分内容不完整、时间不正确以及高级工作人员参与不一致。结论 本次审计突出了在遵守WHO手术安全核对表方面的关键差距,强调了有针对性干预的必要性。这些干预措施包括工作人员培训、实时监测和加强问责制。解决这些差距可显著提高手术安全性和患者预后。计划进行重新审计以评估所提议更改的影响。