• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心源性休克治疗团队:过去、现在与未来方向

Cardiogenic Shock Teams: Past, Present, and Future Directions.

作者信息

Blumer Vanessa, Hanff Thomas C, Gage Ann, Schrage Benedikt, Kanwar Manreet K

机构信息

Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Falls Church, VA (V.B.).

Division of Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (T.C.H.).

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2025 May;18(5):e011630. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011630. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011630
PMID:40151941
Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a significant challenge in cardiovascular medicine, characterized by substantial morbidity and mortality. Historically, patient outcomes in CS have been varied, highly dependent on the timeliness of interventions and the expertise available at treating centers. Emerging evidence indicates that structured, team-based approaches significantly improve survival rates and diminish complications linked to CS. However, several challenges for implementing a team-based approach persist, including optimizing team composition and resource distribution. This article delves into the evolution, current implementations, and future directions of CS teams, emphasizing their crucial role in enhancing patient outcomes. We advocate for the adoption of standardized protocols to ensure uniformity of care across institutions, highlighting the critical need for prompt recognition and management strategies that integrate invasive hemodynamic monitoring and early mechanical circulatory support. Looking ahead, we propose the extension of CS team models into regional networks, broadening their impact through education, telemedicine and collaborative protocols. We also emphasize the importance of continuous research and data sharing via national registries to refine CS team strategies and substantiate their effects on patient outcomes. Ultimately, this review highlights the imperative for ongoing innovation and standardization in CS team operations to improve care delivery and enhance survival rates in CS scenarios.

摘要

心源性休克(CS)仍然是心血管医学中的一项重大挑战,其特征是高发病率和高死亡率。从历史上看,CS患者的预后各不相同,高度依赖于干预措施的及时性以及治疗中心所具备的专业知识。新出现的证据表明,结构化的、基于团队的方法能显著提高生存率,并减少与CS相关的并发症。然而,实施基于团队的方法仍存在一些挑战,包括优化团队组成和资源分配。本文深入探讨了CS团队的发展历程、当前实施情况以及未来发展方向,强调了它们在改善患者预后方面的关键作用。我们主张采用标准化方案,以确保各机构之间护理的一致性,强调迫切需要将有创血流动力学监测和早期机械循环支持相结合的快速识别和管理策略。展望未来,我们建议将CS团队模式扩展到区域网络,通过教育、远程医疗和协作方案扩大其影响力。我们还强调通过国家登记处进行持续研究和数据共享的重要性,以完善CS团队策略并证实其对患者预后的影响。最终,本综述强调了CS团队运作中持续创新和标准化的必要性,以改善护理服务并提高CS情况下的生存率。

相似文献

1
Cardiogenic Shock Teams: Past, Present, and Future Directions.心源性休克治疗团队:过去、现在与未来方向
Circ Heart Fail. 2025 May;18(5):e011630. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011630. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
The Role of a Cardiogenic Shock Team in Decision Making Surrounding Mechanical Circulatory Support.心源性休克团队在围绕机械循环支持的决策中的作用。
Can J Cardiol. 2025 Apr;41(4):682-690. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
3
Need for a Cardiogenic Shock Team Collaborative-Promoting a Team-Based Model of Care to Improve Outcomes and Identify Best Practices.心源性休克团队协作的必要性——促进基于团队的护理模式,以改善预后并确定最佳实践。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e031979. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031979. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
4
Cardiogenic shock teams and centres: a contemporary review of multidisciplinary care for cardiogenic shock.心源性休克治疗团队与中心:心源性休克多学科护理的当代综述
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):988-998. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13180. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
5
Building a cardiogenic shock response team: key considerations necessary to improve outcomes.构建心源性休克反应团队:改善预后的关键考虑因素。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024 Aug 1;30(4):354-361. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001177. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
6
Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Cardiac ICUs With Versus Without Shock Teams.心外 ICU 中是否设置休克团队对心源性休克的管理和预后的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Sep 28;78(13):1309-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.044.
7
Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock.标准化的以团队为基础的心源性休克治疗方案。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 9;73(13):1659-1669. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.084.
8
Value of Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support.机械循环支持治疗心源性休克患者的血流动力学监测价值。
Circulation. 2020 Apr 7;141(14):1184-1197. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043080. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
A team-based approach to patients in cardiogenic shock.一种针对心源性休克患者的团队协作方法。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;88(3):424-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26297. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
10
Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克早期机械循环支持的可行性:底特律心源性休克倡议
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):454-461. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27427. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiogenic Shock Due to Progressive Heart Failure-Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Compared to Other Aetiologies.进展性心力衰竭所致心源性休克——与其他病因相比的临床特征及结局
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 30;13(8):1856. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081856.
2
Current Perspectives on Rehabilitation Following Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Narrative Review.心脏骤停后自主循环恢复后康复治疗的当前观点:一项叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;13(15):1865. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151865.