Bluestone Julia, Bryce Emily, Rowe Alexander K, Ahuja Naina J, Murathi Wincate M, Njogu Rosemary N, Chandio Arshad
Program and Technical Excellence Office, Jhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Research, Jhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Glob Health. 2025 Mar 28;15:04109. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04109.
Health workers play a key role in providing high-quality health services, but health worker practice improvements remain limited despite significant investments in learning and performance interventions. We conducted a situational analysis to explore factors affecting health worker performance, focusing on barriers and facilitators and integrating digital solutions.
In the analysis we focussed on paid professional health workers. Primary data collection occurred between April-May 2022 across seven countries, involving key informant interviews with immunisation program managers and human resource representatives. In three countries, human-centred design meetings included surveys on preferred interventions for improving learning and performance. Secondary data included a desk review of the literature, including recent strategy documents from the Gavi Alliance. We used a virtual session with human-centred design facilitators to create a health worker learning journey map.
Our findings show a shift towards digital and innovative approaches in learning, though traditional methods, such as in-service training and supervision, still dominate. Most initiatives depend on donor funding. There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of digital solutions. Integration with health workers' continuing professional development processes is limited, but career advancement motivates engagement. Challenges include inadequate staffing, limited training opportunities, and poor digital infrastructure. Preferred methods include workplace-based learning and digitally supported training. Evidence supports quality improvement or group problem-solving to improve practices, while other approaches, such as eLearning or blended learning and mentorship, require further evaluation.
Stakeholders, including donors, should prioritise support for more effective learning approaches, combining strategies to improve outcomes. While stakeholders desire to expand digital learning, given the limited evidence, prioritising effectiveness evaluations are crucial. Educating stakeholders on evidence-based practices, promoting combined strategies, evaluating unproven interventions, and aligning donor funding with effective approaches is critical to enhancing interventions.
卫生工作者在提供高质量卫生服务方面发挥着关键作用,但尽管在学习和绩效干预方面投入巨大,卫生工作者实践的改善仍然有限。我们进行了一项情境分析,以探讨影响卫生工作者绩效的因素,重点关注障碍和促进因素,并整合数字解决方案。
在分析中,我们关注有薪酬的专业卫生工作者。2022年4月至5月期间在七个国家进行了主要数据收集,包括对免疫规划管理人员和人力资源代表的关键信息访谈。在三个国家,以人为中心的设计会议包括对改善学习和绩效的首选干预措施的调查。二手数据包括对文献的案头审查,包括来自全球疫苗免疫联盟的近期战略文件。我们与以人为中心的设计促进者举行了一次虚拟会议,以创建卫生工作者学习旅程地图。
我们的研究结果表明,学习方式正朝着数字化和创新方法转变,不过在职培训和监督等传统方法仍然占据主导地位。大多数举措依赖于捐助资金。缺乏关于数字解决方案有效性的证据。与卫生工作者持续专业发展过程的整合有限,但职业发展激励参与。挑战包括人员配备不足、培训机会有限和数字基础设施薄弱。首选方法包括基于工作场所的学习和数字支持的培训。有证据支持通过质量改进或小组问题解决来改善实践,而其他方法,如电子学习、混合学习和指导,则需要进一步评估。
包括捐助者在内的利益相关者应优先支持更有效的学习方法,结合各种策略以改善结果。虽然利益相关者希望扩大数字学习,但鉴于证据有限,优先进行有效性评估至关重要。向利益相关者宣传循证实践、推广综合策略、评估未经证实的干预措施以及使捐助资金与有效方法保持一致,对于加强干预措施至关重要。