• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过综合疾病监测计划,利用谷歌趋势调查来预测印度北部急性发热疾病的爆发情况。

Investigating Google Trends to forecast acute febrile illness outbreaks in North India reported through the Integrated Disease Surveillance Program.

作者信息

Verma Madhur, Kishore Kamal, Parija Pragyan Paramita, Sahoo Soumya Swaroop, Gambhir Dolly, Gupta Usha, Kakkar Rakesh

机构信息

Department of Community & Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bathinda, Punjab, 151001, India.

Department of Biostatistics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10801-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-025-10801-0
PMID:40155818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11951705/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute Febrile Illness (AFI) like Malaria, Dengue, Chikungunya, and Enteric fever still remain the most common cause of seeking healthcare in low-middle-income countries and need to be constantly monitored for any impending outbreak. Digital epidemiology promises to assist traditional health surveillance. The health data (including AFI) collated by Google using specialised platforms like Google Trends (GT) is known to correlate with actual disease trends. The present study thus aims to assess the potential of GT to support routine surveillance system and forecast AFI outbreaks reported through the Indian Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP).

METHODS

We utilised Haryana's IDSP portal to retrieve the weekly data of the most commonly reported infectious diseases causing AFI between 2011 and 2020. Internet search trends were downloaded using GT. Descriptive statistics estimated the burden of the AFI and Bland-Altman's plot depicted statistical agreement between the two. We adopted the Box-Jenkins approach to attain the final SARIMA model and explain the time-dependent weekly incidence of AFI.

RESULTS

The time series plot of the reported AFI displayed trends. Martin- Bland plots depicted acceptable agreement between two datasets for all Chikungunya and Dengue. Among the models evaluated, the Malaria model [SARIMA(1,1,1)(1,1,1)] demonstrated the best performance with a balanced fit and reasonable accuracy, while the Enteric Fever model [SARIMA(0,1,0)(1,1,1)] exhibited low prediction error but weak seasonal significance. In contrast, the Dengue [SARIMA(1,1,0)(1,1,0)] and Chikungunya [ARIMA(1,0,0)(0,0,0)] models had high forecast errors, limiting their predictive reliability. Overall, GT supplemented the prediction performance of the SARIMA models with adjusted R of 46%, 50%, 50%, and 52% compared to the original 43%, 49%, 20%, and 48%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study observed modest improvements in GT-based SARIMA forecasting models compared to routine IDSP mechanisms for predicting AFI outbreaks in Haryana, highlighting the potential for further enhancement. As more granular GT data becomes available, its integration with traditional surveillance systems could significantly enhance forecasting accuracy for AFI and other infectious disease outbreaks. At no additional cost to the health system, GT can serve as a valuable, real-time digital epidemiology tool, strengthening public health preparedness and enabling timely interventions for the early containment of emerging diseases.

摘要

背景

在低收入和中等收入国家,诸如疟疾、登革热、基孔肯雅热和伤寒等急性发热性疾病(AFI)仍然是人们寻求医疗服务的最常见原因,需要持续监测以防范任何即将爆发的疫情。数字流行病学有望辅助传统的健康监测。众所周知,谷歌利用谷歌趋势(GT)等专业平台整理的健康数据(包括AFI数据)与实际疾病趋势相关。因此,本研究旨在评估GT支持常规监测系统以及预测通过印度综合疾病监测计划(IDSP)报告的AFI疫情的潜力。

方法

我们利用哈里亚纳邦的IDSP门户网站检索2011年至2020年间最常报告的导致AFI的传染病的每周数据。使用GT下载互联网搜索趋势。描述性统计估计了AFI的负担,布兰德-奥特曼图描绘了两者之间的统计一致性。我们采用博克斯-詹金斯方法获得最终的季节性自回归整合移动平均(SARIMA)模型,并解释AFI的时间依赖性每周发病率。

结果

报告的AFI的时间序列图显示出趋势。马丁-布兰德图显示所有基孔肯雅热和登革热的两个数据集之间具有可接受的一致性。在评估的模型中,疟疾模型[SARIMA(1,1,1)(1,1,1)]表现最佳,拟合良好且准确性合理,而伤寒模型[SARIMA(0,1,0)(1,1,1)]预测误差低但季节性意义较弱。相比之下,登革热模型[SARIMA(1,1,0)(1,1,0)]和基孔肯雅热模型[ARIMA(1,0,0)(0,0,0)]预测误差高,限制了它们的预测可靠性。总体而言,GT补充了SARIMA模型的预测性能,调整后的R值分别为46%、50%、50%和52%,而原始值分别为43%、49%、20%和48%。

结论

我们的研究观察到,与哈里亚纳邦预测AFI疫情的常规IDSP机制相比,基于GT的SARIMA预测模型有适度改进,凸显了进一步提升的潜力。随着更多粒度的GT数据可用,将其与传统监测系统整合可显著提高AFI和其他传染病疫情的预测准确性。在不增加卫生系统成本的情况下,GT可作为一种有价值的实时数字流行病学工具,加强公共卫生防范,并为及时控制新发疾病实现早期干预提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/69c3e4efedc8/12879_2025_10801_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/723830e66cde/12879_2025_10801_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/9a2ea38c84d0/12879_2025_10801_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/dddd8e41edbe/12879_2025_10801_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/7c695a72b6d3/12879_2025_10801_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/69c3e4efedc8/12879_2025_10801_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/723830e66cde/12879_2025_10801_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/9a2ea38c84d0/12879_2025_10801_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/dddd8e41edbe/12879_2025_10801_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/7c695a72b6d3/12879_2025_10801_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d03/11951705/69c3e4efedc8/12879_2025_10801_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating Google Trends to forecast acute febrile illness outbreaks in North India reported through the Integrated Disease Surveillance Program.通过综合疾病监测计划,利用谷歌趋势调查来预测印度北部急性发热疾病的爆发情况。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10801-0.
2
Mapping the stability of febrile illness hotspots in Punjab from 2012 to 2019- a spatial clustering and regression analysis.从 2012 年到 2019 年旁遮普邦发热病热点的稳定性映射——空间聚类和回归分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):2014. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16930-y.
3
Google Search Trends Predicting Disease Outbreaks: An Analysis from India.谷歌搜索趋势预测疾病爆发:来自印度的分析
Healthc Inform Res. 2018 Oct;24(4):300-308. doi: 10.4258/hir.2018.24.4.300. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
4
Investigating the utility of Google trends for Zika and Chikungunya surveillance in Venezuela.调查谷歌趋势在委内瑞拉用于寨卡和基孔肯雅热监测的实用性。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):947. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09059-9.
5
Using Clinical Profiles and Complete Blood Counts to Differentiate Causes of Acute Febrile Illness during the 2009-11 Outbreak of Typhoid and Chikungunya in a Dengue Endemic Area.利用临床特征和全血细胞计数鉴别 2009-2011 年登革热流行区伤寒和基孔肯雅热爆发期间急性发热性疾病的病因。
J Trop Pediatr. 2020 Oct 1;66(5):504-510. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa006.
6
Correlation between Google Trends on dengue fever and national surveillance report in Indonesia.印度尼西亚登革热谷歌趋势与国家监测报告之间的相关性。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1552652. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1552652.
7
Sentinel Enhanced Dengue Surveillance System - Puerto Rico, 2012-2022.哨点增强登革热监测系统-波多黎各,2012-2022 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024 May 30;73(3):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7303a1.
8
Mapping the Outbreaks of Dengue and Chikungunya and Their Syndemic in India: A Comprehensive Analysis Over the Past Decade Utilizing the Data From the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP).绘制印度登革热和基孔肯雅热疫情及其综合征流行情况:利用综合疾病监测计划(IDSP)的数据对过去十年进行的综合分析
Cureus. 2025 Jan 9;17(1):e77193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77193. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Forecasting incidence of dengue in Rajasthan, using time series analyses.利用时间序列分析预测拉贾斯坦邦的登革热发病率。
Indian J Public Health. 2012 Oct-Dec;56(4):281-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.106415.
10
Coinfections as an aetiology of acute undifferentiated febrile illness among adult patients in the sub-Himalayan region of north India.在印度北部喜马拉雅地区的成年患者中,合并感染作为急性未分化发热性疾病的病因。
J Vector Borne Dis. 2018 Apr-Jun;55(2):130-136. doi: 10.4103/0972-9062.242560.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping the stability of febrile illness hotspots in Punjab from 2012 to 2019- a spatial clustering and regression analysis.从 2012 年到 2019 年旁遮普邦发热病热点的稳定性映射——空间聚类和回归分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):2014. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16930-y.
2
IHIP - A Leap into India's Dream of Digitalizing Healthcare.印度医疗保健信息化计划——迈向印度医疗数字化梦想的飞跃。
Indian J Community Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;48(1):201. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_739_22. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
3
Rapid range shifts in African mosquitoes over the last century.
上个世纪,非洲蚊子的分布范围迅速变化。
Biol Lett. 2023 Feb;19(2):20220365. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0365. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
4
Modeling COVID-19 incidence with Google Trends.利用谷歌趋势对新冠疫情发病率进行建模。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Sep 15;7:1003972. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.1003972. eCollection 2022.
5
Opportunities and challenges to accurate diagnosis and management of acute febrile illness in adults and adolescents: A review.成人和青少年急性发热性疾病准确诊断和管理的机遇与挑战:综述。
Acta Trop. 2022 Mar;227:106286. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106286. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Field Epidemiology Training Programs to accelerate public health workforce development and global health security.现场流行病学培训项目,以加速公共卫生人力发展和全球卫生安全。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;110 Suppl 1:S3-S5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.08.021. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
7
The correlation between Google trends and salmonellosis.谷歌趋势与沙门氏菌病的相关性。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):1575. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11615-w.
8
Exploring the Utility of Google Mobility Data During the COVID-19 Pandemic in India: Digital Epidemiological Analysis.探索 COVID-19 大流行期间谷歌移动数据在印度的实用性:数字流行病学分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 30;7(8):e29957. doi: 10.2196/29957.
9
Reliability of Google Trends: Analysis of the Limits and Potential of Web Infoveillance During COVID-19 Pandemic and for Future Research.谷歌趋势的可靠性:新冠疫情期间及未来研究中网络信息监测的局限性与潜力分析
Front Res Metr Anal. 2021 May 25;6:670226. doi: 10.3389/frma.2021.670226. eCollection 2021.
10
Time series analysis of cumulative incidences of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers in China using both Grey and SARIMA models.基于灰色模型和 SARIMA 模型的中国伤寒和副伤寒累积发病率时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 28;15(10):e0241217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241217. eCollection 2020.