Tan Luke, Sheri Sonia, Goh Yun Yao, Fong Raeanne, Govindasamy Ranitha, Ong Yun Ting, Abdul Hamid Nur Amira Binte, Low Tessa Li Xiang, Krishna Lalit Kumar Radha
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308207, Singapore.
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 28;24(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01728-z.
The growing preference for home-based end-of-life care accords a dignified death for terminally ill patients. However, for healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved, this caregiving approach is embedded with unique psychosocial, practical and emotional stressors. Without sufficient support, HCPs face higher risks of moral distress, compassion fatigue, vicarious trauma, secondary traumatic stress and burnout-collectively known as the costs of caring-that precipitate depersonalisation and compromised patient care. Despite its far-reaching implications, current understanding of the costs of caring amongst HCPs in home-based settings remains remiss. Thus, we conduct a scoping review to investigate the experiences of HPCs providing home-based palliative care to terminally ill adult oncology patients.
Outlined by the Systematic Evidence-Based Approach and PRISMA guidelines, searches for relevant articles published between 1st January 2000 and 1st October 2024 were performed on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases. Selected articles underwent concurrent and independent thematic and content analyses. Central themes and categories were extracted and merged, forming key domains that framed the discussion.
Of 5676 titles and abstracts screened, 543 full-text articles were reviewed. 20 full-text articles were analysed for inclusion. Four key domains emerged: (1) motivations to practice palliative care; (2) impact on personhood of HCPs (3) challenges faced by HCPs; and (4) support systems for HCPs.
Providing home-based palliative care to adult oncology patients is fulfilling for HCPs-fostering meaningful professional relationships with patients, a more holistic perspective of life and death and a heightened sense of personal accomplishment. However, HCPs may encounter dissonance amidst conflicts between their dominant beliefs and new experiences, leading to burnout, depersonalisation and poor care delivery that are further exacerbated by the costs of caring, if inadequately addressed. Longitudinal and accessible personalised and organisational support is key to sustaining HCPs' capacity to deliver compassionate and high-quality palliative care. The use of the Ring Theory of Personhood framework in this review provides an avenue for the structuring of such support systems.
人们越来越倾向于在家中接受临终关怀,这为绝症患者提供了有尊严的死亡方式。然而,对于参与其中的医护人员而言,这种护理方式伴随着独特的心理社会、实际操作和情感压力源。如果没有足够的支持,医护人员面临更高的道德困扰、同情疲劳、替代性创伤、继发性创伤压力和职业倦怠风险,这些统称为护理成本,会导致医护人员出现人格解体,进而影响患者护理质量。尽管其影响深远,但目前对于居家环境中医护人员护理成本的了解仍然不足。因此,我们进行了一项范围综述,以调查医护人员为成年晚期肿瘤患者提供居家姑息治疗的经历。
按照基于循证的系统方法和PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Embase、Scopus、PsycINFO和CINAHL数据库中检索2000年1月1日至2024年10月1日期间发表的相关文章。对选定的文章进行同步和独立的主题及内容分析。提取并合并中心主题和类别,形成构成讨论框架的关键领域。
在筛选的5676个标题和摘要中,对543篇全文进行了审查。分析了20篇全文以确定是否纳入。出现了四个关键领域:(1)从事姑息治疗的动机;(2)对医护人员人格的影响;(3)医护人员面临的挑战;(4)医护人员的支持系统。
为成年肿瘤患者提供居家姑息治疗对医护人员来说是有意义的,能促进与患者建立有意义的专业关系,培养对生死更全面的看法,并增强个人成就感。然而,医护人员在其主导信念与新经历之间的冲突中可能会产生不协调感,导致职业倦怠、人格解体和护理质量低下,如果处理不当,护理成本会进一步加剧这些问题。纵向且易于获得的个性化和组织支持是维持医护人员提供富有同情心和高质量姑息治疗能力的关键。本综述中使用的人格环理论框架为构建此类支持系统提供了一条途径。