• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注社区生活痴呆患者的照料者:对GUIDE模型的启示

A look at caregivers for community-living persons with dementia: Implications for the GUIDE model.

作者信息

Burgdorf Julia G, Freedman Vicki A, Wolff Jennifer L

机构信息

Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York, New York, USA.

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Mar;21(3):e70013. doi: 10.1002/alz.70013.

DOI:10.1002/alz.70013
PMID:40156263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11953562/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medicare's new Guiding an Improved Dementia Experience (GUIDE) model funds integrated dementia care and related caregiver supports for community-living persons with dementia (PwD). Caregiver strain is a factor in provider payment and performance.

METHODS

We examined national survey data on community-living PwD and their caregivers to identify which caregivers would receive support under GUIDE and characterize caregiver strain and use of supportive services.

RESULTS

Half of GUIDE-eligible PwD received care from multiple caregivers and high strain was common even among caregivers considered "low-complexity" under GUIDE. Use of role-related training, respite care, and support groups were low (11%, 18%, and 4%, respectively) and did not vary with caregiver strain.

DISCUSSION

Caregiver identification and assessment standards under GUIDE may overlook a significant number of caregivers. To maximize impact, innovative models like GUIDE should align caregiver engagement and services with the unique realities of care networks for PwD.

HIGHLIGHTS

Half of GUIDE-eligible persons with dementia have multiple caregivers. 32% of caregivers for community-living PwD report high strain. 11% of caregivers for community-living PwD received training and 18% used respite care.

摘要

引言

医疗保险的新型“改善痴呆症体验指南”(GUIDE)模式为社区生活的痴呆症患者(PwD)提供综合痴呆症护理及相关照料者支持资金。照料者压力是提供者支付和绩效的一个因素。

方法

我们研究了关于社区生活的痴呆症患者及其照料者的全国调查数据,以确定哪些照料者将在GUIDE模式下获得支持,并描述照料者压力及支持性服务的使用情况。

结果

符合GUIDE模式资格的痴呆症患者中有一半接受了多位照料者的护理,即使在GUIDE模式下被认为“低复杂程度”的照料者中,高压力情况也很常见。与角色相关的培训、喘息服务和支持小组的使用率较低(分别为11%、18%和4%),且与照料者压力无关。

讨论

GUIDE模式下的照料者识别和评估标准可能会忽视大量照料者。为了使影响最大化,像GUIDE这样的创新模式应使照料者参与度和服务与痴呆症患者护理网络的独特现实情况相匹配。

要点

符合GUIDE模式资格的痴呆症患者中有一半有多位照料者。32%的社区生活痴呆症患者的照料者报告有高压力。11%的社区生活痴呆症患者的照料者接受了培训,18%的照料者使用了喘息服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1439/11953562/e88ee9d7d182/ALZ-21-e70013-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1439/11953562/a8d136ae09a8/ALZ-21-e70013-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1439/11953562/e88ee9d7d182/ALZ-21-e70013-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1439/11953562/a8d136ae09a8/ALZ-21-e70013-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1439/11953562/e88ee9d7d182/ALZ-21-e70013-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A look at caregivers for community-living persons with dementia: Implications for the GUIDE model.关注社区生活痴呆患者的照料者:对GUIDE模型的启示
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Mar;21(3):e70013. doi: 10.1002/alz.70013.
2
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
3
Unmet needs in community-living persons with dementia are common, often non-medical and related to patient and caregiver characteristics.社区居住的痴呆症患者存在未满足的需求较为常见,这些需求通常是非医疗性的,与患者和照护者的特征有关。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Nov;31(11):1643-1654. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218002296. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
4
Factors affecting the use of home-based services and out-of-home respite care services: A survey of family caregivers for older persons with dementia in Northern Norway.影响居家服务和外出喘息护理服务使用的因素:对挪威北部痴呆老年人家庭照顾者的调查。
Dementia (London). 2020 Jul;19(5):1712-1731. doi: 10.1177/1471301218804981. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Psychological well-being over time among informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia living at home.长期居家照顾痴呆患者的非正式照护者的心理健康状况。
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Nov;21(11):1138-1146. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1211621. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
6
Adult Day Service Use Decreases Likelihood of a Missed Physician's Appointment Among Dementia Caregivers.成人日间护理服务降低痴呆照护者错过医生预约的可能性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1467-1471. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15995. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
The Impact of Living Arrangements on Dementia Caregivers' Sleep Quality.居住安排对痴呆症照料者睡眠质量的影响。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015 Jun;30(4):352-9. doi: 10.1177/1533317514559828. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
An interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) of coercion towards community dwelling older adults with dementia: findings from Mysore studies of natal effects on ageing and health (MYNAH).对社区居住的老年痴呆症患者的强制行为的解释现象学分析(IPA):迈索尔衰老与健康出生效应研究(MYNAH)的结果
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;51(12):1659-1664. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1286-4. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
Why do family dementia caregivers reject caregiver support services? Analyzing types of rejection and associated health-impairments in a cluster-randomized controlled intervention trial.为什么家庭痴呆症照顾者拒绝照顾者支持服务?在一项集群随机对照干预试验中分析拒绝的类型和相关的健康损害。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4970-8.
10
The Going to Stay at Home program: combining dementia caregiver training and residential respite care.“留守在家”计划:将痴呆症护理人员培训与住宅暂托护理相结合。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Nov;30(11):1697-1706. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000686. Epub 2018 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Family Care Partners and Paid Caregivers: National Estimates of Role-Sharing in Home Care.家庭护理伙伴与付费护理人员:家庭护理中角色分担的全国性估计
Gerontologist. 2024 Dec 17;65(2). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae177.
2
Are Family Caregiving Programs Appropriate for Minority Caregivers? A Systematic Review of 37 Caregiving Programs.家庭照顾者项目是否适合少数族裔照顾者?对37个照顾者项目的系统评价
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Nov 5:7334648241298109. doi: 10.1177/07334648241298109.
3
Patient Portals Fail to Collect Structured Information About Who Else is Involved in a Person's Care.
患者门户未能收集有关其他人参与患者护理的结构化信息。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 27;26:e49394. doi: 10.2196/49394.
4
Longitudinal Management of Dementia in Primary Care.基层医疗中痴呆症的纵向管理
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 1;184(5):459-460. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8513.
5
Impact of diagnosed (vs undiagnosed) dementia on family caregiving experiences.诊断(与未诊断)痴呆症对家庭照护体验的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Apr;71(4):1236-1242. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18155. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
6
Shared Care Networks Assisting Older Adults: New Insights From the National Health and Aging Trends Study.共同照护网络辅助老年人:来自国家健康与老龄化趋势研究的新见解。
Gerontologist. 2023 Jun 15;63(5):840-850. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac155.
7
Engaging and Supporting Care Partners of Persons With Dementia in Health-Care Delivery: Results From a National Consensus Conference.在医疗服务中吸引并支持痴呆症患者的护理伙伴:全国共识会议的结果
Public Policy Aging Rep. 2022 Apr 25;32(2):58-65. doi: 10.1093/ppar/prac004. eCollection 2022.
8
Caring Together: Trajectories of Paid and Family Caregiving Support to Those Living in the Community With Dementia.共同照护:为社区中患有痴呆症的人群提供有偿和家庭照护支持的轨迹。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 May 20;77(Suppl_1):S11-S20. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac006.
9
Provider perspectives on integrating family caregivers into patient care encounters.提供者对将家庭照顾者纳入患者护理的看法。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):892-904. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13932. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
10
Use of motivational techniques to enhance unpaid caregiver engagement in a tailored skills training intervention.使用激励技巧来增强非付费护理人员参与定制技能培训干预的积极性。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Feb;26(2):337-344. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1855103. Epub 2020 Dec 16.