Hernández-Martín Marta M, Meneses-Monroy Alfonso, Rodríguez Pedrosa María Isabel, Moreno-Pimentel Antonio, Mayor-Silva Luis Iván, de-Pedro-Jiménez Domingo, Moreno Guillermo
Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Complutense University of Madrid.
Occupational Health Service, Complutense University of Madrid.
Workplace Health Saf. 2025 Aug;73(8):421-433. doi: 10.1177/21650799251328020. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have become the primary cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine the differential cardiovascular risk profile among university professionals.
A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 1,483 workers from a public university in Madrid. Sociodemographic variables, lifestyle factors, and cardiovascular risk factors were collected. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk were calculated using the SCORE2 system. The workers were classified according to their professional category (faculty vs. administrative personnel), sex, or type of contract (government employees vs. non-government employees). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted with the variables professional category, physical activity (PA), and SCORE2.
The calculated risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was lower in women than in men (3.00 ± 1.91 vs. 4.06 ± 2.26; < .001), higher in the administrative personnel than in the faculty (3.82 ± 2.10 vs. 3.20 ± 2.18; < .001), and lower in the non-government employees compared to the government employees (3.21 ± 2.05 vs. 3.83 ± 2.22; < .001). The group that engaged in less PA was the administrative personnel non-government employees. The regression model results corroborate the hypothesis that administrative personnel government employees and non-government employees as well as faculty non-government employees, are at a higher risk of physical inactivity than faculty government employees. Furthermore, the data indicates that administrative personnel government employees are at an elevated cardiovascular risk.Conclusion/Applications to Practice:It is essential to consider the professional category and the type of contract to assess cardiovascular risk in university workers. It is recommended that strategies be implemented to promote PA among university professionals.
心血管疾病（CVD）已成为全球发病和死亡的主要原因。本研究的目的是检查大学专业人员之间不同的心血管风险状况。
对马德里一所公立大学的1483名工作人员进行了横断面研究。收集了社会人口统计学变量、生活方式因素和心血管危险因素。使用SCORE2系统计算心血管发病和死亡风险。工作人员根据其职业类别（教师与行政人员）、性别或合同类型（政府雇员与非政府雇员）进行分类。对职业类别、体力活动（PA）和SCORE2变量进行多项逻辑回归分析。
计算得出女性心血管发病和死亡风险低于男性（3.00±1.91对4.06±2.26；<0.001），行政人员高于教师（3.82±2.10对3.20±2.18；<0.001），非政府雇员低于政府雇员（3.21±2.05对3.83±2.22；<0.001）。体力活动较少的群体是行政人员非政府雇员。回归模型结果证实了以下假设：行政人员政府雇员和非政府雇员以及教师非政府雇员比教师政府雇员有更高的身体不活动风险。此外，数据表明行政人员政府雇员心血管风险升高。
结论/实践应用：在评估大学工作人员的心血管风险时，必须考虑职业类别和合同类型。建议实施策略以促进大学专业人员的体力活动。
