Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Institute of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440577. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40577.
A previous cohort study in the US found that women with higher cardiovascular risk were more likely to have a history of migraine but less likely to have active migraine. Extrapolating these results to men and European individuals is crucial to understanding the complex association between migraine activity status and vascular health in other populations.
To evaluate the association pattern between a cardiovascular risk score, the most recent European version of the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) risk estimation system, and migraine activity status in Dutch men and women.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The prospective population-based Lifelines cohort consists of community-dwelling adults residing in the northern part of the Netherlands. Individuals with a terminal illness, incapacitated individuals, including those with a severe mental illness, or who were unable to visit their general practitioner or complete the questionnaires were excluded from participation within Lifelines. Participants whose data on the cardiovascular risk scores and migraine status were complete were included in the analysis. Data on baseline characteristics were collected between November 1, 2006, to December 31, 2014. Cross-sectional and follow-up analyses were conducted within the prospective cohort. Questionnaires were sent approximately every 1.5 to 2.5 years, and the last self-reported migraine assessment took place between October 1, 2019, and January 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2022, to August 16, 2024.
The SCORE2 is a sex-specific European cardiovascular risk score that includes age, cholesterol levels, smoking status, diabetes, and systolic blood pressure.
The primary outcome was the association pattern between cardiovascular risk scores and migraine activity status. SCORE2 risk scores were measured once at baseline; groups of the SCORE2 (<1.0%, 1.0% to <2.5%, 2.5% to <5.0%, 5.0% to <7.5%, 7.5% to <10.0%, and ≥10.0%) were created based on the sum of points of individual risk factors. Migraine activity status was assessed using self-reported questionnaires and classified as (1) prevalent (ie, migraine at baseline), (2) incident (ie, no migraine at baseline but migraine in ≥1 follow-up), and (3) none. To evaluate the influence of age, we conducted stratified analyses of the SCORE2 by age categories (<40, 40-49, and ≥50 years).
The total study population consisted of 140 915 individuals at baseline with a mean (SD) age of 44.4 (12.7) years, of whom 58.5% were women. In total, 25 915 individuals (18.4% of the total population) had prevalent migraine and 2224 (1.9% of the 115 000 without prevalent migraine) had incident migraine. The odds of having prevalent and incident migraine, compared with individuals with a SCORE2 category of less than 1.0%, varied and decreased with increasing SCORE2 categories, with odds ratios (ORs) for prevalent migraine ranging from 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96) for a SCORE2 category of 1.0% to less than 2.5% to 0.43 (95% CI, 0.39-0.48) for a SCORE2 category of at least 10.0% and, for incident migraine, from 0.63 (95% CI, 0.57-0.69) for a SCORE2 category of 1.0% to less than 2.5% to 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10-0.27) for a SCORE2 category of at least 10.0%. A similar pattern was observed in both sexes but more profound in women. In women, ORs for prevalent migraine ranged from 1.21 (95% CI, 1.16-1.25) to 0.70 (95% CI, 0.58-0.83) (vs 1.19 [95% CI, 1.09-1.29] to 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.99] in men) and, for incident migraine, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64-0.80) to 0.20 (95% CI, 0.07-0.43) (vs 1.18 [95% CI, 0.92-1.52] to 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22-0.78] in men). Models with incident migraine as the outcome showed lower ORs across the ascending cardiovascular risk score categories. Age stratification suggested that the association between cardiovascular risk scores and migraine activity status were unlikely to be strongly influenced by age.
In this cohort study of community-dwelling Dutch adults, the odds of having prevalent or incident migraine decreased with increasing cardiovascular risk score categories. These results support the hypothesis that a relatively healthy cardiovascular system increases the probability of having active or developing migraine in the future, especially among women. Sex differences might play a pathophysiological role in the association between migraine activity and vascular health.
此前在美国进行的一项队列研究发现,心血管风险较高的女性更有可能有偏头痛病史,但偏头痛发作的可能性较小。将这些结果推断到男性和欧洲人群中,对于理解其他人群中偏头痛发作状态与血管健康之间的复杂关联至关重要。
评估心血管风险评分与荷兰男性和女性最近的欧洲系统性冠状动脉风险评估 2 版(SCORE2)风险评估系统之间的关联模式,以及偏头痛发作状态。
设计、地点和参与者: 前瞻性人群为基础的 Lifelines 队列由居住在荷兰北部的社区居民组成。患有终末期疾病、丧失能力的个体,包括患有严重精神疾病的个体,或无法访问他们的全科医生或完成问卷的个体,被排除在 Lifelines 参与之外。纳入分析的参与者心血管风险评分和偏头痛状态数据完整。基线特征数据于 2006 年 11 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日收集。前瞻性队列中进行了横断面和随访分析。问卷每 1.5 至 2.5 年发送一次,最后一次自我报告偏头痛评估于 2019 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 1 月 31 日进行。数据分析于 2022 年 3 月 1 日至 2024 年 8 月 16 日进行。
SCORE2 是一种特定于性别的欧洲心血管风险评分,包括年龄、胆固醇水平、吸烟状况、糖尿病和收缩压。
主要结果是心血管风险评分与偏头痛发作状态之间的关联模式。SCORE2 风险评分在基线时测量一次;根据个体危险因素得分总和,创建了 SCORE2 风险评分的分组(<1.0%、1.0%至<2.5%、2.5%至<5.0%、5.0%至<7.5%、7.5%至<10.0%和≥10.0%)。偏头痛发作状态使用自我报告的问卷进行评估,并分为(1)现患(即在基线时有偏头痛)、(2)新发(即在基线时无偏头痛但在≥1次随访中有偏头痛)和(3)无偏头痛。为了评估年龄的影响,我们按年龄(<40 岁、40-49 岁和≥50 岁)对 SCORE2 进行分层分析。
总研究人群由 140915 名在基线时平均(SD)年龄为 44.4(12.7)岁的个体组成,其中 58.5%为女性。共有 25915 名个体(总人口的 18.4%)有现患偏头痛,2224 名(无现患偏头痛的 115000 人中的 1.9%)有新发偏头痛。与 SCORE2 类别<1.0%的个体相比,现患和新发偏头痛的发生几率有所不同,且随着 SCORE2 类别的增加而降低,现患偏头痛的比值比(ORs)范围从 SCORE2 类别为 1.0%至<2.5%的 0.93(95%CI,0.90-0.96)到 SCORE2 类别为≥10.0%的 0.43(95%CI,0.39-0.48),新发偏头痛的 ORs 范围从 SCORE2 类别为 1.0%至<2.5%的 0.63(95%CI,0.57-0.69)到 SCORE2 类别为≥10.0%的 0.17(95%CI,0.10-0.27)。在男性和女性中均观察到类似的模式,但在女性中更为明显。在女性中,现患偏头痛的 OR 范围从 1.21(95%CI,1.16-1.25)到 0.70(95%CI,0.58-0.83)(而男性为 1.19 [95%CI,1.09-1.29]至 0.84 [95%CI,0.72-0.99]),新发偏头痛的 OR 范围从 0.72(95%CI,0.64-0.80)到 0.20(95%CI,0.07-0.43)(而男性为 1.18 [95%CI,0.92-1.52]至 0.44 [95%CI,0.22-0.78])。以新发偏头痛为结局的模型显示,随着心血管风险评分类别的上升,OR 值较低。年龄分层表明,心血管风险评分与偏头痛发作状态之间的关联不太可能受到年龄的强烈影响。
在这项对荷兰社区居民的队列研究中,现患或新发偏头痛的几率随着心血管风险评分类别的增加而降低。这些结果支持了这样一种假设,即相对健康的心血管系统增加了未来发生偏头痛或发展为偏头痛的可能性,尤其是在女性中。性别差异可能在偏头痛发作与血管健康之间的关联中发挥病理生理学作用。