• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较牙髓病病例中的诊断技能:牙科学生与ChatGPT-4o。

Comparing diagnostic skills in endodontic cases: dental students versus ChatGPT-4o.

作者信息

Durmazpinar Parla Meva, Ekmekci Ece

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 29;25(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05857-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05857-y
PMID:40158110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11955126/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have revolutionized fields such as economics, law, and healthcare. Large language models, like ChatGPT, have shown significant potential in dentistry, supporting diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and education. However, earlier versions of ChatGPT were limited to text-based data. The latest multimodal model, ChatGPT-4o, introduced in 2024, now processes text, images, audio, and video, enabling broader applications in clinical education. This study evaluates ChatGPT-4o's diagnostic accuracy in endodontic cases, comparing it with dental students' performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included two groups of dental students: 3rd-year and 5th-year, alongside ChatGPT-4o. Participants answered 15 multiple-choice questions designed using radiographs, clinical photographs, and patient histories. These questions, based on the American Association of Endodontists' Clinical Guidelines, were administered via Google Forms for students and ChatGPT-4o. Responses were categorized as correct, incorrect, or unanswered. Data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

ChatGPT-4o demonstrated a higher accuracy rate and lower error rate compared to students, with 91.4% correct and 8.2% incorrect responses. Third-year students had a correct response rate of 60.8%, while fifth-year students achieved 79.5%. A statistically significant difference was found between the study groups in terms of correct response rates (p < 0.05), with ChatGPT outperforming both student groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, fifth-year students showed a higher correct response rate compared to third-year students.

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT-4o demonstrates significant potential as a diagnostic support tool in dental education, particularly in endodontics. Its high diagnostic accuracy and consistency highlight its value as an innovative ( application in clinical training and decision-making.

摘要

背景

人工智能(AI)技术已经给经济学、法律和医疗保健等领域带来了变革。像ChatGPT这样的大语言模型在牙科领域显示出了巨大潜力,有助于提高诊断准确性、辅助治疗计划制定以及支持教育工作。然而,早期版本的ChatGPT仅限于基于文本的数据。2024年推出的最新多模态模型ChatGPT-4o现在能够处理文本、图像、音频和视频,从而在临床教育中有更广泛的应用。本研究评估ChatGPT-4o在牙髓病病例中的诊断准确性,并将其与牙科学生的表现进行比较。

材料和方法

本研究包括两组牙科学生:三年级和五年级学生,以及ChatGPT-4o。参与者回答了15道基于X光片、临床照片和患者病史设计的多项选择题。这些问题基于美国牙髓病学家协会的临床指南,通过谷歌表单对学生和ChatGPT-4o进行测试。答案分为正确、错误或未回答。对数据进行统计学分析。

结果

与学生相比,ChatGPT-4o显示出更高的准确率和更低的错误率,正确回答率为91.4%,错误回答率为8.2%。三年级学生的正确回答率为60.8%,而五年级学生为79.5%。在正确回答率方面,研究组之间存在统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.05),ChatGPT的表现优于两个学生组(p < 0.001)。此外,五年级学生的正确回答率高于三年级学生。

结论

ChatGPT-4o作为牙科教育中的诊断支持工具具有巨大潜力,特别是在牙髓病学方面。其高诊断准确性和一致性凸显了它在临床培训和决策中的创新应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f3/11955126/a885d610e218/12903_2025_5857_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f3/11955126/8d741c66ee47/12903_2025_5857_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f3/11955126/1184d5ad9922/12903_2025_5857_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f3/11955126/a885d610e218/12903_2025_5857_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f3/11955126/8d741c66ee47/12903_2025_5857_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f3/11955126/1184d5ad9922/12903_2025_5857_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8f3/11955126/a885d610e218/12903_2025_5857_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing diagnostic skills in endodontic cases: dental students versus ChatGPT-4o.比较牙髓病病例中的诊断技能:牙科学生与ChatGPT-4o。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 29;25(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05857-y.
2
Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy in endodontic assessments: dental students vs. artificial intelligence.牙髓评估诊断准确性的对比分析:牙科学学生与人工智能。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 May 3;11(3):259-265. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0034. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
3
AI-powered standardised patients: evaluating ChatGPT-4o's impact on clinical case management in intern physicians.人工智能驱动的标准化病人:评估ChatGPT-4o对实习医生临床病例管理的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06877-6.
4
Evaluation of the performance of ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4o as a learning tool in endodontics.评估ChatGPT-4和ChatGPT-4o作为牙髓病学学习工具的性能。
Int Endod J. 2025 Mar 2. doi: 10.1111/iej.14217.
5
Evaluating ChatGPT and Google Gemini Performance and Implications in Turkish Dental Education.评估ChatGPT和谷歌Gemini在土耳其牙科教育中的性能及影响
Cureus. 2025 Jan 11;17(1):e77292. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77292. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4o in the Japanese National Dental Examination.ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4o在日本国家牙科考试中的表现。
J Dent Educ. 2025 Apr;89(4):459-466. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13766. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
7
Comparative performance of artificial intelligence models in rheumatology board-level questions: evaluating Google Gemini and ChatGPT-4o.人工智能模型在风湿病委员会级问题中的比较性能:评估 Google Gemini 和 ChatGPT-4o。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Nov;43(11):3507-3513. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07154-5. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
8
Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-4o and Gemini Advanced Performance on Diagnostic Radiology In-Training Exams.ChatGPT-4o与Gemini在放射诊断学培训考试中的性能对比分析
Cureus. 2025 Mar 20;17(3):e80874. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80874. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
GPT-4o vs. Human Candidates: Performance Analysis in the Polish Final Dentistry Examination.GPT-4o与人类考生:波兰牙科最终考试中的表现分析
Cureus. 2024 Sep 6;16(9):e68813. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68813. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Performance of large language artificial intelligence models on solving restorative dentistry and endodontics student assessments.大型语言人工智能模型在解决修复牙科和牙髓学生评估方面的性能。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Oct 7;28(11):575. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05968-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning models for prognosis prediction in regenerative endodontic procedures.用于再生牙髓治疗预后预测的机器学习模型
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05531-3.
2
Precise multi-factor immediate implant placement decision models based on machine learning.基于机器学习的精确多因素即刻种植决策模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):5143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89814-3.
3
Performance of artificial intelligence on Turkish dental specialization exam: can ChatGPT-4.0 and gemini advanced achieve comparable results to humans?
人工智能在土耳其牙科专业考试中的表现:ChatGPT-4.0和Gemini Advanced能否取得与人类相当的成绩?
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06389-9.
4
Performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4o in the Japanese National Dental Examination.ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4o在日本国家牙科考试中的表现。
J Dent Educ. 2025 Apr;89(4):459-466. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13766. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
5
Comparative accuracy of artificial intelligence chatbots in pulpal and periradicular diagnosis: A cross-sectional study.人工智能聊天机器人在牙髓和根尖周诊断中的比较准确性:一项横断面研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Dec;183:109332. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109332. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
6
Performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in national licensing examinations for medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and nursing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ChatGPT-3.5 和 GPT-4 在医学、药学、牙科和护理国家执照考试中的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1013. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05944-8.
7
The ethics of ChatGPT in medicine and healthcare: a systematic review on Large Language Models (LLMs).ChatGPT在医学与医疗保健领域的伦理问题:关于大语言模型(LLMs)的系统综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jul 8;7(1):183. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01157-x.
8
Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy in endodontic assessments: dental students vs. artificial intelligence.牙髓评估诊断准确性的对比分析:牙科学学生与人工智能。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 May 3;11(3):259-265. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0034. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
9
Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-aided caries detection on bitewing radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.咬合翼片X线片上人工智能辅助龋病检测的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024 Dec;60:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness of virtual reality-based education and conventional teaching methods in dental education: a systematic review.虚拟现实为基础的教育与传统教学方法在口腔医学教育中的效果比较:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04954-2.