Zhao Helen, Davis Rachel E, Davis Alexander S, Meoli Susan L, Cretara Elizabeth A
School of Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2025 Jul-Aug;8(4):400-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2025.03.010. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued guidance in 2016 that sex should be treated as a biological variable in clinical studies; however, previous research has shown that biomedical studies still fail to include sex as a biological variable (SABV) in study design and analysis. We hypothesize that despite evidence for sex-specific glaucoma risk factors, clinical trials for glaucoma topical medications also fail to treat SABV.
Prior studies have found sex-specific genetic and hormonal risk factors for glaucoma suggesting that biological sex may influence the disease course.
We performed a systematic review on Pubmed and Google Scholar using terms including generic names of common glaucoma medications, and filters "randomized control trial" and "clinical trial." Resulting studies were reviewed and included if they met inclusion criteria including randomized controlled trial design, testing of topical glaucoma medications in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, and published between 2002-2022. Included studies were read and assessed on metrics pertinent to SABV including sex reporting and matching, sex-based analysis of medication efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and mention of SABV in the discussion and conclusion.
We identified 543 studies; 122/543 (22.5%) met inclusion criteria representing 31 644 subjects; 16 656/31 644 (52.6%) were women. Sex of subjects was reported in 109/122 (89%) studies. However, only 5/122 (4%) mentioned sex in data analysis, including efficacy (1), AEs (1), and mention of sex in the discussion or conclusion (4). We found that studies published after the NIH guidance on SABV in 2016 and studies funded by the NIH were not more likely to include SABV, however only 3 of 122 (2.5%) studies were NIH-funded. Pregnancy or lactation were exclusion criteria for 31/122 (25%) studies.
While the majority of glaucoma topical medication clinical trials reported sex and achieved sex-matching, they failed to include sex-based analysis of medication efficacy or AEs. Opportunities remain to include SABV to improve our understanding of the impact of biological sex on glaucoma treatment, although that may require increases in sample size.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)在2016年发布指南,指出在临床研究中应将性别视为生物学变量;然而,先前的研究表明,生物医学研究在研究设计和分析中仍未将性别作为生物学变量(SABV)纳入。我们推测,尽管有证据表明存在特定性别的青光眼危险因素,但青光眼局部用药的临床试验也未能将SABV纳入考量。
先前的研究发现了青光眼的特定性别遗传和激素危险因素,这表明生物性别可能会影响疾病进程。
我们在PubMed和谷歌学术上进行了系统综述,使用的检索词包括常见青光眼药物的通用名称,并筛选了“随机对照试验”和“临床试验”。对检索出的研究进行了审查,若符合纳入标准则予以纳入,纳入标准包括随机对照试验设计、对开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者使用局部青光眼药物进行测试,以及在2002年至2022年期间发表。对纳入的研究进行阅读,并根据与SABV相关的指标进行评估,包括性别报告与匹配、基于性别的药物疗效分析、不良事件(AE),以及在讨论和结论中对SABV的提及。
我们共识别出543项研究;其中122项(22.5%)符合纳入标准,涉及31644名受试者;其中16656名(52.6%)为女性。109项(89%)研究报告了受试者的性别。然而,只有5项(4%)研究在数据分析中提及了性别,包括疗效(1项)、不良事件(1项),以及在讨论或结论中提及性别(4项)。我们发现,2016年NIH发布关于SABV的指南后发表的研究以及由NIH资助的研究,纳入SABV的可能性并未更高,不过122项研究中只有3项(2.5%)由NIH资助。31项(25%)研究将妊娠或哺乳期作为排除标准。
虽然大多数青光眼局部用药的临床试验报告了性别并实现了性别匹配,但它们未能纳入基于性别的药物疗效或不良事件分析。仍有机会纳入SABV,以增进我们对生物性别对青光眼治疗影响的理解,不过这可能需要增加样本量。
作者对本文讨论的任何材料均无所有权或商业利益。