Jilka Sagar, Winsper Catherine, Johnson Samantha A, Ilozumba Onaedo, Wagner Ryan G, Subhedar Sanjana, Morroni Dafne, Lilford Richard, Singh Swaran P
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Feb 27;12:e35. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.20. eCollection 2025.
Traditional faith healers (TFHs) are often consulted for serious mental illness (SMIs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Involvement of TFHs in mental healthcare could provide an opportunity for early identification and intervention to reduce the mental health treatment gap in LMICs. The aim of this study was to identify models of collaboration between TFHs and biomedical professionals, determine the outcomes of these collaborative models and identify any mechanisms (i.e., explanatory processes) or contextual moderators (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of these outcomes. A systematic scoping review of five electronic databases was performed from inception to March 2023 guided by consultation with local experts in Nigeria and Bangladesh. Data were extracted using a predefined data charting form and synthesised narratively. Six independent studies (eight articles) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Study locations included Ghana (n = 1), Nigeria (n = 1), Nigeria and Ghana (n = 1), India (n = 1), Hong Kong (n = 1) and South Africa (n = 1). We identified two main intervention typologies: (1) Western-based educational interventions for TFHs and (2) shared collaborative models between TFHs and biomedical professionals. Converging evidence from both typologies indicated that education for TFHs can help reduce harmful practices. Shared collaborative models led to significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms (in comparison to care as usual) and increases in referrals to biomedical care from TFHs. Proposed mechanisms underpinning outcomes included trust building and empowering TFHs by increasing awareness and knowledge of mental illness and human rights. Barriers to implementation were observed at the individual (e.g., suspicions of TFHs), relationship (e.g., reluctance of biomedical practitioners to equalise their status with TFHs) and service (e.g., lack of formal referral systems) levels. Research on collaborative models for mental healthcare is in its infancy. Preliminary findings are encouraging. To ensure effective collaboration, future programmes should incorporate active participation from community stakeholders (e.g., patients, caregivers, faith healers) and target barriers to implementation on multiple levels.
在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),患有严重精神疾病(SMIs)的患者常常会寻求传统信仰治疗师(TFHs)的帮助。TFHs参与精神卫生保健工作,可能为早期识别和干预提供契机,以缩小LMICs的精神卫生治疗差距。本研究旨在确定TFHs与生物医学专业人员之间的合作模式,确定这些合作模式的效果,并找出这些效果背后的任何机制(即解释过程)或背景调节因素(即障碍和促进因素)。在与尼日利亚和孟加拉国的当地专家协商的指导下,对五个电子数据库进行了从建库至2023年3月的系统综述。使用预先定义的数据图表形式提取数据,并进行叙述性综合分析。六项独立研究(八篇文章)符合纳入标准。研究地点包括加纳(n = 1)、尼日利亚(n = 1)、尼日利亚和加纳(n = 1)、印度(n = 1)、中国香港(n = 1)和南非(n = 1)。我们确定了两种主要的干预类型:(1)针对TFHs的西式教育干预;(2)TFHs与生物医学专业人员之间的共享合作模式。两种类型的证据均表明,对TFHs的教育有助于减少有害行为。共享合作模式使精神症状有显著改善(与常规护理相比),且TFHs转介至生物医学护理的人数增加。结果背后的潜在机制包括通过提高对精神疾病和人权的认识及知识来建立信任并增强TFHs的能力。在个人层面(例如,对TFHs的怀疑)、关系层面(例如,生物医学从业者不愿与TFHs平起平坐)和服务层面(例如,缺乏正式的转诊系统)均观察到了实施障碍。精神卫生保健合作模式的研究尚处于起步阶段。初步研究结果令人鼓舞。为确保有效合作,未来的项目应纳入社区利益相关者(如患者、护理人员、信仰治疗师)的积极参与,并针对多层次的实施障碍。