• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作物收获后播种前,耕地土壤会排放大量一氧化二氮。

Large nitrous oxide emissions from arable soils after crop harvests prior to sowing.

作者信息

Maier Regine, Hörtnagl Lukas, Buchmann Nina

机构信息

Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2025;130(2):161-175. doi: 10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0
PMID:40161351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11950146/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Global agriculture is the largest anthropogenic source for nitrous oxide (NO) emissions. During crop rotations, periods with arable soils without crops, thereafter called "bare soils" are often impossible to avoid after the crop is harvested, prior to sowing of the next crop. However, such periods are underrepresented in studies focussing on NO emissions. Here, we present continuous, high-temporal-resolution NO fluxes during bare soil periods after four major crops, using the eddy-covariance technique at two sites in Switzerland. Overall, periods with bare soil were net sources for NO as well as for carbon dioxide (CO) and methane (CH). Daily average sums of NO emissions varied between 10 ± 2 and 38 ± 5 g NO-N ha d after the respective rapeseed, winter wheat, pea, and maize harvests. While CO emissions contributed 86-96% to the total GHG budgets, NO fluxes accounted for 2% after pea, but for 10-12% after rapeseed, winter wheat, and maize. In contrast, CH fluxes were negligible (< 2%). NO fluxes during bare soil periods increased for all cropland sites with increasing water-filled pore space, particularly at high soil temperatures. Thus, our study emphasizes the significance of avoiding bare soil periods to mitigate NO emissions from croplands.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0.

摘要

未标注

全球农业是一氧化二氮(N₂O)排放的最大人为来源。在作物轮作期间,收获作物后、播种下一季作物之前,经常不可避免地会出现没有作物的可耕地时期,此后称为“裸土”时期。然而,在关注N₂O排放的研究中,这些时期的代表性不足。在此,我们利用瑞士两个地点的涡度协方差技术,展示了四种主要作物收获后裸土时期连续的、高时间分辨率的N₂O通量。总体而言,裸土时期是N₂O以及二氧化碳(CO₂)和甲烷(CH₄)的净排放源。在各自的油菜、冬小麦、豌豆和玉米收获后,N₂O排放的日平均总量在10±2至38±5克N-N·公顷⁻¹·天⁻¹之间变化。虽然CO₂排放在温室气体总预算中占86%-96%,但豌豆收获后N₂O通量占2%,而油菜、冬小麦和玉米收获后占10%-12%。相比之下,CH₄通量可忽略不计(<2%)。随着土壤孔隙含水量增加,所有农田站点裸土时期的N₂O通量均增加,尤其是在土壤温度较高时。因此,我们的研究强调了避免裸土时期以减少农田N₂O排放的重要性。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a0/11950146/b4a368e1c8a8/10705_2024_10395_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a0/11950146/81dd3553d1ee/10705_2024_10395_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a0/11950146/ee3fd7681c25/10705_2024_10395_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a0/11950146/b4a368e1c8a8/10705_2024_10395_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a0/11950146/81dd3553d1ee/10705_2024_10395_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a0/11950146/ee3fd7681c25/10705_2024_10395_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a0/11950146/b4a368e1c8a8/10705_2024_10395_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Large nitrous oxide emissions from arable soils after crop harvests prior to sowing.作物收获后播种前,耕地土壤会排放大量一氧化二氮。
Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2025;130(2):161-175. doi: 10.1007/s10705-024-10395-0. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Greenhouse gas fluxes (CO, NO and CH) of pea and maize during two cropping seasons: Drivers, budgets, and emission factors for nitrous oxide.两个种植季节豌豆和玉米的温室气体通量(CO、NO和CH):一氧化二氮的驱动因素、收支及排放因子
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 25;849:157541. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157541. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
3
Greenhouse gas budget (CO2, CH4 and N2O) of intensively managed grassland following restoration.修复后集约管理草地的温室气体预算(CO2、CH4 和 N2O)。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jun;20(6):1913-28. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12518. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
4
Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from soil under integrated farming systems in southern Brazil.巴西南部综合农业系统土壤中一氧化二氮和甲烷的排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 1;828:154555. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154555. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
5
"Effects of soil management, rotation and sequence of crops on soil nitrous oxide emissions in the Cerrado: A multi-factor assessment".土壤管理、作物轮作和种植顺序对塞拉多地区土壤一氧化二氮排放的影响:多因素评估
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 15;348:119295. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119295. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
6
Net ecosystem carbon and greenhouse gas budgets in fiber and cereal cropping systems.纤维作物和粮食作物种植系统中的生态系统碳和温室气体收支。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 10;647:895-904. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.048. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
7
Potential role of compost and green manure amendment to mitigate soil GHGs emissions in Mediterranean drip irrigated maize production systems.堆肥和绿肥改良在减轻地中海滴灌玉米生产系统土壤 GHGs 排放中的潜在作用。
J Environ Manage. 2017 May 1;192:68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
8
Can urea-coated fertilizers be an effective means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving crop productivity?尿素包膜肥料能否成为减少温室气体排放和提高作物生产力的有效手段?
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:121927. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121927. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
9
Measuring and modeling the effects of drainage water management on soil greenhouse gas fluxes from corn and soybean fields.测量和建模排水管理对玉米和大豆田土壤温室气体通量的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:652-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.040. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
10
[Effects of Water Deficit on Greenhouse Gas Emission in Wheat Field in Different Periods].[水分亏缺对不同时期麦田温室气体排放的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2019 May 8;40(5):2413-2425. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201808075.

本文引用的文献

1
Plants mitigate ecosystem nitrous oxide emissions primarily through reductions in soil nitrate content: Evidence from a meta-analysis.植物主要通过降低土壤硝酸盐含量来减少生态系统一氧化二氮排放:来自荟萃分析的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 1;949:175115. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175115. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
On the adjusted NO emission factor in dry subhumid, semiarid, and arid regions.关于半湿润、半干旱和干旱地区的调整后一氧化氮排放因子。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jul;30(7):e17402. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17402.
3
NO and CH fluxes from intensively managed grassland: The importance of biological and environmental drivers vs. management.
集约化管理草地的一氧化氮和甲烷通量:生物与环境驱动因素与管理的重要性
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 10;903:166389. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166389. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Crop cover is more important than rotational diversity for soil multifunctionality and cereal yields in European cropping systems.在欧洲种植系统中,对于土壤多功能性和谷物产量而言,作物覆盖比轮作多样性更为重要。
Nat Food. 2021 Jan;2(1):28-37. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00210-8. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
Global mapping of crop-specific emission factors highlights hotspots of nitrous oxide mitigation.全球作物特定排放因子制图突出了减少一氧化二氮的热点。
Nat Food. 2021 Nov;2(11):886-893. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00384-9. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
6
Greenhouse gas fluxes (CO, NO and CH) of pea and maize during two cropping seasons: Drivers, budgets, and emission factors for nitrous oxide.两个种植季节豌豆和玉米的温室气体通量(CO、NO和CH):一氧化二氮的驱动因素、收支及排放因子
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 25;849:157541. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157541. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
7
A review and meta-analysis of mitigation measures for nitrous oxide emissions from crop residues.作物残体一氧化二氮排放缓解措施的综述和荟萃分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 1;828:154388. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154388. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
8
Predicting field NO emissions from crop residues based on their biochemical composition: A meta-analytical approach.基于生化成分预测作物残体的田间氮氧化物排放:一种荟萃分析方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 15;812:152532. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152532. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
9
A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks.全球一氧化二氮排放源与汇的综合量化评估。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7828):248-256. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2780-0. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
10
The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data.FLUXNET2015 数据集和涡度相关通量数据的 ONEFlux 处理管道。
Sci Data. 2020 Jul 9;7(1):225. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0534-3.