Ryu HaYoung, Abdul Azim Ahmed, Bhatt Pinki J, Uprety Priyanka, Mohayya Sana, Dixit Deepali, Kirn Thomas J, Narayanan Navaneeth
Department of Pharmacy, Oregon Health & Sciences University Hospital and Clinics, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2023 Aug;9(4):198-216. doi: 10.1007/s40495-023-00323-1. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may reduce morbidity and mortality related to bacterial infections by reducing time to identification of pathogens and antibiotic resistance mechanisms. There has been a significant increase in the breadth and depth of available technology utilized by RDTs.
There are numerous Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared assays for rapid detection of bacteria from various specimen types from sites including blood, stool, central nervous system and respiratory tract. Most RDTs currently FDA-cleared are molecular tests designed as syndromic panels that provide identification of on-panel organisms and resistance genes. One FDA-cleared rapid phenotypic assay for antimicrobial susceptibility testing is currently available and others are in development. Studies of these technologies' clinical impact consistently demonstrate improvements in clinical care processes such as time to de-escalation and escalation of antibiotic therapy particularly for blood and respiratory specimen tests. Other RDTs show inconsistent impact on antibiotic use. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are vital to ensure the greatest benefit from RDTs in clinical practice.
The advancement and implementation of RDTs, in conjunction with antimicrobial stewardship, to enhance treatment selection for bacterial infections should be regarded as a core element to improve clinical outcomes for patients. Although challenges exist in the use of RDTs, there is a need for continued innovation in technology, implementation science and collaboration across clinical professions to optimize care.
快速诊断测试(RDTs)可通过缩短病原体鉴定时间和抗生素耐药机制检测时间,降低与细菌感染相关的发病率和死亡率。RDTs所采用技术的广度和深度都有显著增加。
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)已批准了众多用于从包括血液、粪便、中枢神经系统和呼吸道等部位的各种标本类型中快速检测细菌的检测方法。目前FDA批准的大多数RDTs是作为综合检测板设计的分子检测方法,可识别检测板上的生物体和耐药基因。目前有一种FDA批准的用于抗菌药物敏感性测试的快速表型检测方法,其他方法也在研发中。对这些技术临床影响的研究一致表明,在临床护理过程中有所改善,例如抗生素治疗降阶梯和升级的时间,特别是对于血液和呼吸道标本检测。其他RDTs对抗生素使用的影响则不一致。抗菌药物管理计划对于确保在临床实践中从RDTs获得最大益处至关重要。
RDTs的进步与实施,以及抗菌药物管理,以加强细菌感染治疗方案的选择,应被视为改善患者临床结局的核心要素。尽管RDTs的使用存在挑战,但仍需要在技术、实施科学以及临床各专业之间的合作方面持续创新,以优化护理。