Kelly Anne-Maree, Muruganandan Sanjeevan, Jones Peter, Keijzers Gerben, Kinnear Fran, Cameron Peter, Badiei Arash, Lee Yc Gary, Smith Julian A, Ball Emma, Bacon Ethan, Bammer Roland, Egerton-Warburton Diana
Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research at Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.
Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2025 Jun;55(6):944-950. doi: 10.1111/imj.70054. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
Management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) has long been contentious.
To identify the factors influencing interventional versus conservative management and to assess current practice patterns for moderate-to-large PSP in emergency department (ED) patients.
Anonymous online survey of emergency medicine, respiratory medicine and thoracic surgery specialists and trainees in Australia and New Zealand. Data collected included rating the decision-making importance of potential drivers of interventional versus conservative management for PSP, initial management preference for stable patients with moderate-large PSP based on three X-ray-based scenarios (one moderate-large, one almost total collapse without mediastinal shift and one large with mediastinal shift) and awareness of evidence and current guidelines for the management of PSP.
There were 456 responses; 85.5% were from Australia. The most commonly reported factors influencing treatment decision-making were vital signs (96.7%) and patient-reported dyspnoea (84.3%). There was variation between specialty groups in initial treatment preference for all scenarios (P < 0.001) and a reduction in preference for conservative treatment as the magnitude of radiological features increased (93.8% vs 61.5% vs 32.1% respectively). Guideline recommendation awareness was low except for the 2023 British Thoracic Society guideline (60.4%).
This study demonstrates variation of opinion regarding the initial management of stable patients with moderate to large PSP and an increasing preference for intervention as the magnitude of radiological features increases. Guideline awareness was low, highlighting the need for an evidence-based approach to PSP management in the ED that is widely understood and accepted across speciality groups and that prioritises patient symptoms over X-ray findings.
原发性自发性气胸(PSP)的管理长期以来一直存在争议。
确定影响介入治疗与保守治疗的因素,并评估急诊科(ED)中中至大量PSP患者的当前治疗模式。
对澳大利亚和新西兰的急诊医学、呼吸医学和胸外科专家及实习生进行匿名在线调查。收集的数据包括对PSP介入治疗与保守治疗潜在驱动因素的决策重要性进行评分,根据三种基于X线的情况(一种中至大量、一种几乎完全塌陷且无纵隔移位、一种大量且有纵隔移位)对稳定的中至大量PSP患者的初始治疗偏好,以及对PSP管理的证据和当前指南的知晓情况。
共收到456份回复;85.5%来自澳大利亚。最常报告的影响治疗决策的因素是生命体征(96.7%)和患者报告的呼吸困难(84.3%)。所有情况下,各专业组的初始治疗偏好存在差异(P < 0.001),并且随着放射学特征程度的增加,保守治疗的偏好降低(分别为93.8%、61.5%和32.1%)。除2023年英国胸科学会指南外,指南推荐知晓率较低(60.4%)。
本研究表明,对于稳定的中至大量PSP患者的初始管理存在意见差异,并且随着放射学特征程度的增加,对介入治疗的偏好也在增加。指南知晓率较低,这突出表明在急诊科需要一种基于证据的PSP管理方法,这种方法应在各专业组中得到广泛理解和接受,并优先考虑患者症状而非X线检查结果。